Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1985 Jan 1;85(1):21–42. doi: 10.1085/jgp.85.1.21

The influence of transverse tubular delays on the kinetics of charge movement in mammalian skeletal muscle

PMCID: PMC2215815  PMID: 3968532

Abstract

A model was developed to describe the kinetics of slow, voltage- dependent charge movement in the rat omohyoid muscle. To represent the electrically distributed nature of the transverse tubular system (t- system), we followed an approach similar to that described by Adrian and Peachey (1973 J. Physiol. [Lond.]. 235:103), and approximated the fiber with 12 concentric cylindrical shells. Incorporated into each shell were capacitative and conductive elements that represented the passive electrical properties of the t-system, and an element representing the mobile charge. The charge was assumed to obey a two- state scheme, in which the redistribution of charge is governed by a first-order reaction, and the rate constants linking the two states were assumed to depend on potential according to the constant field expression. The predictions of this "distributed two-state model" were compared with charge movements experimentally measured in individual fibers. For this comparison, first, the passive electrical parameters of the model were adjusted to fit the experimental linear capacity transient. Next, the Boltzmann expression was fitted to the steady state Q vs. V data of the fiber, thereby constraining the voltage dependence of the rate constants, but not their absolute magnitude. The absolute magnitude was determined by fitting the theory to an experimental charge movement at a single test potential, which in turn constrained the fits at all other test potentials. The distributed two- state model well described the rising and falling phases of ON, OFF, and stepped OFF charge movements at temperatures ranging from 3 to 25 degrees C. We thus conclude that tubular delays are sufficient to account for the rounded rising phase of experimental charge movements, and that it is unnecessary to postulate higher-order reaction schemes for the underlying charge redistribution.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adrian R. H., Almers W. Charge movement in the membrane of striated muscle. J Physiol. 1976 Jan;254(2):339–360. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adrian R. H., Chandler W. K., Hodgkin A. L. The kinetics of mechanical activation in frog muscle. J Physiol. 1969 Sep;204(1):207–230. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Adrian R. H. Charge movement in the membrane of striated muscle. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1978;7:85–112. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.07.060178.000505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Adrian R. H., Marshall M. W. Sodium currents in mammalian muscle. J Physiol. 1977 Jun;268(1):223–250. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Adrian R. H., Peachey L. D. Reconstruction of the action potential of frog sartorius muscle. J Physiol. 1973 Nov;235(1):103–131. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Almers W. Gating currents and charge movements in excitable membranes. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 1978;82:96–190. doi: 10.1007/BFb0030498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Andersen O. S., Fuchs M. Potential energy barriers to ion transport within lipid bilayers. Studies with tetraphenylborate. Biophys J. 1975 Aug;15(8):795–830. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(75)85856-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Beam K. G., Donaldson P. L. A quantitative study of potassium channel kinetics in rat skeletal muscle from 1 to 37 degrees C. J Gen Physiol. 1983 Apr;81(4):485–512. doi: 10.1085/jgp.81.4.485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Benz R., Zimmermann U. Evidence for the presence of mobile charges in the cell membrane of Valonia utricularis. Biophys J. 1983 Jul;43(1):13–26. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(83)84318-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Camerino D., Bryant S. H. Effects of denervation and colchicine treatment on the chloride conductance of rat skeletal muscle fibers. J Neurobiol. 1976 May;7(3):221–228. doi: 10.1002/neu.480070305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Campbell D. T. Sodium channel gating currents in frog skeletal muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1983 Nov;82(5):679–701. doi: 10.1085/jgp.82.5.679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chandler W. K., Rakowski R. F., Schneider M. F. A non-linear voltage dependent charge movement in frog skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1976 Jan;254(2):245–283. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cullen M. J., Hollingworth S., Marshall M. W. A comparative study of the transverse tubular system of the rat extensor digitorum longus and soleus muscles. J Anat. 1984 Mar;138(Pt 2):297–308. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dulhunty A. F., Gage P. W. Asymmetrical charge movement in slow- and fast-twitch mammalian muscle fibres in normal and paraplegic rats. J Physiol. 1983 Aug;341:213–231. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Eisenberg B. R., Kuda A. M. Stereological analysis of mammalian skeletal muscle. II. White vastus muscle of the adult guinea pig. J Ultrastruct Res. 1975 May;51(2):176–187. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(75)80146-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. HODGKIN A. L., HUXLEY A. F. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol. 1952 Aug;117(4):500–544. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. HUXLEY A. F., TAYLOR R. E. Local activation of striated muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1958 Dec 30;144(3):426–441. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Heiny J. A., Ashcroft F. M., Vergara J. T-system optical signals associated with inward rectification in skeletal muscle. Nature. 1983 Jan 13;301(5896):164–166. doi: 10.1038/301164a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hodgkin A. L., Nakajima S. The effect of diameter on the electrical constants of frog skeletal muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1972 Feb;221(1):105–120. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hollingworth S., Marshall M. W. A comparative study of charge movement in rat and frog skeletal muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1981 Dec;321:583–602. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp014004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Horowicz P., Schneider M. F. Membrane charge moved at contraction thresholds in skeletal muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1981 May;314:595–633. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Luff A. R., Atwood H. L. Changes in the sarcoplasmic reticulum and transverse tubular system of fast and slow skeletal muscles of the mouse during postnatal development. J Cell Biol. 1971 Nov;51(21):369–383. doi: 10.1083/jcb.51.2.369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mathias R. T., Eisenberg R. S., Valdiosera R. Electrical properties of frog skeletal muscle fibers interpreted with a mesh model of the tubular system. Biophys J. 1977 Jan;17(1):57–93. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(77)85627-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Müntener M., Gottschall J., Neuhuber W., Mysicka A., Zenker W. The ansa cervicalis and the infrahyoid muscles of the rat. I. Anatomy; distribution, number and diameter of fiber types; motor units. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1980;159(1):49–57. doi: 10.1007/BF00299254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pappone P. A. Voltage-clamp experiments in normal and denervated mammalian skeletal muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1980 Sep;306:377–410. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Schneider M. F., Chandler W. K. Voltage dependent charge movement of skeletal muscle: a possible step in excitation-contraction coupling. Nature. 1973 Mar 23;242(5395):244–246. doi: 10.1038/242244a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sigworth F. J., Neher E. Single Na+ channel currents observed in cultured rat muscle cells. Nature. 1980 Oct 2;287(5781):447–449. doi: 10.1038/287447a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sigworth F. J. The variance of sodium current fluctuations at the node of Ranvier. J Physiol. 1980 Oct;307:97–129. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Simon B. J., Beam K. G. Charge movement in a fast twitch skeletal muscle from rat. Biophys J. 1983 Feb;41(2):223–226. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(83)84423-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Simon B. J., Beam K. G. Slow charge movement in mammalian skeletal muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1985 Jan;85(1):1–19. doi: 10.1085/jgp.85.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Stevens C. F. Interactions between intrinsic membrane protein and electric field. An approach to studying nerve excitability. Biophys J. 1978 May;22(2):295–306. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(78)85490-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Valdiosera R., Clausen C., Eisenberg R. S. Impedance of frog skeletal muscle fibers in various solutions. J Gen Physiol. 1974 Apr;63(4):460–491. doi: 10.1085/jgp.63.4.460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES