Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1987 Mar 1;89(3):443–457. doi: 10.1085/jgp.89.3.443

Cell suspensions from porcine olfactory mucosa. Changes in membrane potential and membrane fluidity in response to various odorants

PMCID: PMC2215906  PMID: 3559517

Abstract

A suspension of olfactory epithelial cells was prepared from porcine olfactory mucosa and the physiological functions of the suspension were examined. The membrane potential of the cell suspension, which was monitored by measuring the fluorescence changes of rhodamine 6G, was depolarized by an increase in the K+ concentration in the external medium. Various odorants depolarized the cell suspension in a dose- dependent fashion. The magnitude of depolarization by odorants was either unchanged or slightly increased by a reduction of the concentration of Na+, Ca2+, and Cl- in the external medium, which suggests that changes in the permeabilities of specific ions are not involved in depolarization by odorants. The application of various odorants to the cell suspension induced changes in the membrane fluidity at different sites of the membrane that were monitored with various fluorescent dyes [8-anilino-1-naphthalene sulfonate, n-(9- anthroyloxy) stearic acids, 12-(9-anthroyloxy) oleic acid, and (1,6- diphenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene)], which suggests that the odorants having different odors are adsorbed on different sites in the membrane. On the basis of these results, a possible mechanism of odor discrimination is discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1,003.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson P. A., Ache B. W. Voltage- and current-clamp recordings of the receptor potential in olfactory receptor cells in situ. Brain Res. 1985 Jul 15;338(2):273–280. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(85)90157-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Getchell T. V. Analysis of intracellular recordings from salamander olfactory epithelium. Brain Res. 1977 Mar 11;123(2):275–286. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(77)90479-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hirsch J. D., Margolis F. L. Cell suspensions from rat olfactory neuroepithelium: biochemical and histochemical characterization. Brain Res. 1979 Feb 2;161(2):277–291. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(79)90069-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kashiwayanagi M., Kurihara K. Evidence for non-receptor odor discrimination using neuroblastoma cells as a model for olfactory cells. Brain Res. 1985 Dec 16;359(1-2):97–103. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(85)91416-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kashiwayanagi M., Kurihara K. Neuroblastoma cell as model for olfactory cell: mechanism of depolarization in response to various odorants. Brain Res. 1984 Feb 20;293(2):251–258. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(84)91232-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Masukawa L. M., Hedlund B., Shepherd G. M. Electrophysiological properties of identified cells in the in vitro olfactory epithelium of the tiger salamander. J Neurosci. 1985 Jan;5(1):128–135. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-01-00128.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Masukawa L. M., Kauer J. S., Shepherd G. M. Intracellular recordings from two cell types in an in vitro preparation of the salamander olfactory epithelium. Neurosci Lett. 1983 Jan 31;35(1):59–64. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(83)90527-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Miyake M., Kurihara K. Resting potential of the mouse neuroblastoma cells. I. The presence of K+ channels activated at high K+ concentration but closed at low K+ concentration including the physiological concentration. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1983 Apr 5;762(2):248–255. doi: 10.1016/0167-4889(83)90078-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Miyake M., Kurihara K. Resting potential of the mouse neuroblastoma cells. II. Significant contribution of the surface potential to the resting potential of the cells under physiological conditions. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1983 Apr 5;762(2):256–264. doi: 10.1016/0167-4889(83)90079-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Miyake M., Nekomiya A., Kurihara K. Contribution of surface potential to resting potential in mouse neuroblastoma cells: estimation with fluorescent dyes and from shift of threshold potential for Ca-spike. Brain Res. 1984 May 28;301(1):73–81. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(84)90404-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Noble M., Mallaburn P. S., Klein N. The growth of olfactory neurons in short-term cultures of rat olfactory epithelium. Neurosci Lett. 1984 Mar 23;45(2):193–198. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(84)90098-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Schachter D., Shinitzky M. Fluorescence polarization studies of rat intestinal microvillus membranes. J Clin Invest. 1977 Mar;59(3):536–548. doi: 10.1172/JCI108669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Schubert D., Stallcup W., LaCorbiere M., Kidokoro Y., Orgel L. Ontogeny of electrically excitable cells in cultured olfactory epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Nov;82(22):7782–7786. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.22.7782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Shinitzky M., Inbar M. Difference in microviscosity induced by different cholesterol levels in the surface membrane lipid layer of normal lymphocytes and malignant lymphoma cells. J Mol Biol. 1974 Jan 5;85(4):603–615. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90318-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Trotier D., MacLeod P. Intracellular recordings from salamander olfactory receptor cells. Brain Res. 1983 Jun 6;268(2):225–237. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(83)90488-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Yoshii K., Kurihara K. Role of cations in olfactory reception. Brain Res. 1983 Sep 12;274(2):239–248. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(83)90701-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES