Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1987 May 1;89(5):771–789. doi: 10.1085/jgp.89.5.771

Force: velocity relationship in single isolated toad stomach smooth muscle cells

PMCID: PMC2215922  PMID: 3110369

Abstract

The relationship between force and shortening velocity (F:V) in muscle is believed to reflect both the mechanics of the myosin cross-bridge and the kinetics of its interaction with actin. To date, the F:V for smooth muscle cells has been inferred from F:V data obtained in multicellular tissue preparations. Therefore, to determine F:V in an intact single smooth muscle cell, cells were isolated from the toad (Bufo marinus) stomach muscularis and attached to a force transducer and length displacement device. Cells were electrically stimulated at 20 degrees C and generated 143 mN/mm2 of active force per muscle cross- sectional area. At the peak of contraction, cells were subjected to sudden changes in force (dF = 0.10-0.90 Fmax) and then maintained at the new force level. The force change resulted in a length response in which the cell length (Lcell) rapidly decreased during the force step and then decreased monotonically with a time constant between 75 and 600 ms. The initial length change that coincided with the force step was analyzed and an active cellular compliance of 1.9% cell length was estimated. The maintained force and resultant shortening velocity (V) were fitted to the Hill hyperbola with constants a/Fmax of 0.268 and b of 0.163 Lcell/s. Vmax was also determined by a procedure in which the cell length was slackened and the time of unloaded shortening was recorded (slack test). From the slack test, Vmax was estimated as 0.583 Lcell/s, in agreement with the F:V data. The F:V data were analyzed within the framework of the Huxley model (Huxley. 1957. Progress in Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry. 7:255-318) for contraction and interpreted to indicate that in smooth muscle, as compared with fast striated muscle, there may exist a greater percentage of attached force- generating cross-bridges.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AUBERT X. La relation entre la force et la vitesse d'allongement et de raccourcissement du muscle strié. Arch Int Physiol Biochim. 1956 Jan;64(1):121–122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Civan M. M., Podolsky R. J. Contraction kinetics of striated muscle fibres following quick changes in load. J Physiol. 1966 Jun;184(3):511–534. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cohen D. M., Murphy R. A. Cellular thin filament protein contents and force generation in porcine arteries and veins. Circ Res. 1979 Nov;45(5):661–665. doi: 10.1161/01.res.45.5.661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Edman K. A., Mulieri L. A., Scubon-Mulieri B. Non-hyperbolic force-velocity relationship in single muscle fibres. Acta Physiol Scand. 1976 Oct;98(2):143–156. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1976.tb00234.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Edman K. A. The velocity of unloaded shortening and its relation to sarcomere length and isometric force in vertebrate muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1979 Jun;291:143–159. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Eisenberg E., Hill T. L., Chen Y. Cross-bridge model of muscle contraction. Quantitative analysis. Biophys J. 1980 Feb;29(2):195–227. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(80)85126-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fay F. S., Delise C. M. Contraction of isolated smooth-muscle cells--structural changes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Mar;70(3):641–645. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.3.641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fay F. S., Hoffmann R., Leclair S., Merriam P. Preparation of individual smooth muscle cells from the stomach of Bufo marinus. Methods Enzymol. 1982;85(Pt B):284–292. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(82)85027-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ford L. E., Huxley A. F., Simmons R. M. Tension responses to sudden length change in stimulated frog muscle fibres near slack length. J Physiol. 1977 Jul;269(2):441–515. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gauthier G. F., Lowey S., Benfield P. A., Hobbs A. W. Distribution and properties of myosin isozymes in developing avian and mammalian skeletal muscle fibers. J Cell Biol. 1982 Feb;92(2):471–484. doi: 10.1083/jcb.92.2.471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gunst S. J. Effect of length history on contractile behavior of canine tracheal smooth muscle. Am J Physiol. 1986 Jan;250(1 Pt 1):C146–C154. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1986.250.1.C146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. HILL A. V. The heat of activation and the heat of shortening in a muscle twitch. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1949 Jun 23;136(883):195–211. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1949.0019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. HUXLEY A. F. Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog Biophys Biophys Chem. 1957;7:255–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hellstrand P., Johansson B. Analysis of the length response to a force step in smooth muscle from rabbit urinary bladder. Acta Physiol Scand. 1979 Jun;106(2):221–238. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1979.tb06392.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Homsher E., Kean C. J. Skeletal muscle energetics and metabolism. Annu Rev Physiol. 1978;40:93–131. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.40.030178.000521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Huxley A. F. Muscular contraction. J Physiol. 1974 Nov;243(1):1–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Julian F. J. The effect of calcium on the force-velocity relation of briefly glycerinated frog muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1971 Oct;218(1):117–145. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Krisanda J. M., Murphy R. A. Tight binding of arterial myosin to skeletal F-actin. J Biol Chem. 1980 Nov 25;255(22):10771–10776. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lännergren J. The force-velocity relation of isolated twitch and slow muscle fibres of Xenopus laevis. J Physiol. 1978 Oct;283:501–521. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Meiss R. A., Sonnenblick E. H. Dynamic elasticity of cardiac muscle as measured by controlled length changes. Am J Physiol. 1974 Jun;226(6):1370–1381. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1974.226.6.1370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mulvany M. J. The undamped and damped series elastic components of a vascular smooth muscle. Biophys J. 1979 Jun;26(3):401–413. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(79)85261-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mulvany M. J., Warshaw D. M. The anatomical location of the series elastic component in rat vascular smooth muscle. J Physiol. 1981 May;314:321–330. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ngai P. K., Walsh M. P. Detection of caldesmon in muscle and non-muscle tissues of the chicken using polyclonal antibodies. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1985 Mar 15;127(2):533–539. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(85)80192-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Owens G. K., Loeb A., Gordon D., Thompson M. M. Expression of smooth muscle-specific alpha-isoactin in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells: relationship between growth and cytodifferentiation. J Cell Biol. 1986 Feb;102(2):343–352. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.2.343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pfitzer G., Peterson J. W., Rüegg J. C. Length dependence of calcium activated isometric force and immediate stiffness in living and glycerol extracted vascular smooth muscle. Pflugers Arch. 1982 Aug;394(2):174–181. doi: 10.1007/BF00582921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Podolin R. A., Ford L. E. The influence of calcium on shortening velocity of skinned frog muscle cells. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 1983 Jun;4(3):263–282. doi: 10.1007/BF00711996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Warshaw D. M., Fay F. S. Cross-bridge elasticity in single smooth muscle cells. J Gen Physiol. 1983 Aug;82(2):157–199. doi: 10.1085/jgp.82.2.157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Warshaw D. M., Fay F. S. Tension transients in single isolated smooth muscle cells. Science. 1983 Mar 25;219(4591):1438–1441. doi: 10.1126/science.6828870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Warshaw D. M., Szarek J. L., Hubbard M. S., Evans J. N. Pharmacology and force development of single freshly isolated bovine carotid artery smooth muscle cells. Circ Res. 1986 Mar;58(3):399–406. doi: 10.1161/01.res.58.3.399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Woledge R. C. The energetics of tortoise muscle. J Physiol. 1968 Aug;197(3):685–707. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES