Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1987 Jun 1;89(6):959–983. doi: 10.1085/jgp.89.6.959

Monovalent and divalent cation permeation in acetylcholine receptor channels. Ion transport related to structure

PMCID: PMC2215970  PMID: 2440979

Abstract

Single channel patch-clamp techniques were used to study nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in cultured rat myotubes. The single channel conductance in pure cesium and sodium levels off at high concentrations, as if a binding site within the channel were saturating. The conductances at very low concentrations, however, are larger than predicted by the simplest one-site transport model fitted to the high-concentration data. At low concentrations, the current- voltage relations are inwardly rectifying, but they become more ohmic if a small amount of divalent cations is added externally. Magnesium and barium are good permeants that have rather high affinities for the channel. Upon adding low millimolar concentrations of these divalent cations externally to a membrane bathed in pure cesium, the inward current carried by cesium is decreased. As more divalent cations are added, the inward-going currents continued to decrease and the divalent cation replaces cesium as the main current carrier. The ion transport data are described by considering the size, shape, and possible net charge of the channel. In that way, even the complex features of transport are explained in a realistic physical framework. The results are consistent with the channel having long, wide, multiply occupied vestibules that serve as transition zones to the short, selective, singly occupied narrow region of the channel. A small amount of net negative charge within the pore could produce concentration-dependent potentials that provide a simple explanation for the more complicated aspects of the permeation properties.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams D. J., Dwyer T. M., Hille B. The permeability of endplate channels to monovalent and divalent metal cations. J Gen Physiol. 1980 May;75(5):493–510. doi: 10.1085/jgp.75.5.493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams D. J., Nonner W., Dwyer T. M., Hille B. Block of endplate channels by permeant cations in frog skeletal muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1981 Dec;78(6):593–615. doi: 10.1085/jgp.78.6.593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Andersen O. S. Ion movement through gramicidin A channels. Studies on the diffusion-controlled association step. Biophys J. 1983 Feb;41(2):147–165. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(83)84416-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Apell H. J., Bamberg E., Läuger P. Effects of surface charge on the conductance of the gramicidin channel. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1979 Apr 19;552(3):369–378. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(79)90181-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ballivet M., Patrick J., Lee J., Heinemann S. Molecular cloning of cDNA coding for the gamma subunit of Torpedo acetylcholine receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Jul;79(14):4466–4470. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.14.4466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bell J. E., Miller C. Effects of phospholipid surface charge on ion conduction in the K+ channel of sarcoplasmic reticulum. Biophys J. 1984 Jan;45(1):279–287. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84154-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bregestovski P. D., Miledi R., Parker I. Calcium conductance of acetylcholine-induced endplate channels. Nature. 1979 Jun 14;279(5714):638–639. doi: 10.1038/279638a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brisson A., Unwin P. N. Quaternary structure of the acetylcholine receptor. Nature. 1985 Jun 6;315(6019):474–477. doi: 10.1038/315474a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Claudio T., Ballivet M., Patrick J., Heinemann S. Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of Torpedo californica acetylcholine receptor gamma subunit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Feb;80(4):1111–1115. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.4.1111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cooper K., Jakobsson E., Wolynes P. The theory of ion transport through membrane channels. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1985;46(1):51–96. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(85)90012-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dani J. A., Eisenman G. Acetylcholine-activated channel current-voltage relations in symmetrical na solutions. Biophys J. 1984 Jan;45(1):10–12. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84087-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dani J. A. Ion-channel entrances influence permeation. Net charge, size, shape, and binding considerations. Biophys J. 1986 Mar;49(3):607–618. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(86)83688-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Devillers-Thiery A., Giraudat J., Bentaboulet M., Changeux J. P. Complete mRNA coding sequence of the acetylcholine binding alpha-subunit of Torpedo marmorata acetylcholine receptor: a model for the transmembrane organization of the polypeptide chain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Apr;80(7):2067–2071. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.7.2067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dwyer T. M., Adams D. J., Hille B. The permeability of the endplate channel to organic cations in frog muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1980 May;75(5):469–492. doi: 10.1085/jgp.75.5.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dwyer T. M., Farley J. M. Permeability properties of chick myotube acetylcholine-activated channels. Biophys J. 1984 Mar;45(3):529–539. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84190-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Eisenman G., Dani J. A. An introduction to molecular architecture and permeability of ion channels. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1987;16:205–226. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.16.060187.001225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Eisenman G., Latorre R., Miller C. Multi-ion conduction and selectivity in the high-conductance Ca++-activated K+ channel from skeletal muscle. Biophys J. 1986 Dec;50(6):1025–1034. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(86)83546-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Eisenman G., Sandblom J., Neher E. Interactions in cation permeation through the gramicidin channel. Cs, Rb, K, Na, Li, Tl, H, and effects of anion binding. Biophys J. 1978 May;22(2):307–340. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(78)85491-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fairclough R. H., Miake-Lye R. C., Stroud R. M., Hodgson K. O., Doniach S. Location of terbium binding sites on acetylcholine receptor-enriched membranes. J Mol Biol. 1986 Jun 20;189(4):673–680. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90497-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Farley J. M., Yeh J. Z., Watanabe S., Narahashi T. Endplate channel block by guanidine derivatives. J Gen Physiol. 1981 Mar;77(3):273–293. doi: 10.1085/jgp.77.3.273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Finer-Moore J., Stroud R. M. Amphipathic analysis and possible formation of the ion channel in an acetylcholine receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jan;81(1):155–159. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.1.155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gage P. W., Van Helden D. Effects of permeant monovalent cations on end-plate channels. J Physiol. 1979 Mar;288:509–528. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Guy H. R. A structural model of the acetylcholine receptor channel based on partition energy and helix packing calculations. Biophys J. 1984 Jan;45(1):249–261. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84152-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hamill O. P., Marty A., Neher E., Sakmann B., Sigworth F. J. Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflugers Arch. 1981 Aug;391(2):85–100. doi: 10.1007/BF00656997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hille B. Ionic selectivity of Na and K channels of nerve membranes. Membranes. 1975;3:255–323. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hille B., Schwarz W. Potassium channels as multi-ion single-file pores. J Gen Physiol. 1978 Oct;72(4):409–442. doi: 10.1085/jgp.72.4.409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Huang L. Y., Catterall W. A., Ehrenstein G. Selectivity of cations and nonelectrolytes for acetylcholine-activated channels in cultured muscle cells. J Gen Physiol. 1978 Apr;71(4):397–410. doi: 10.1085/jgp.71.4.397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Imoto K., Methfessel C., Sakmann B., Mishina M., Mori Y., Konno T., Fukuda K., Kurasaki M., Bujo H., Fujita Y. Location of a delta-subunit region determining ion transport through the acetylcholine receptor channel. Nature. 1986 Dec 18;324(6098):670–674. doi: 10.1038/324670a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kistler J., Stroud R. M., Klymkowsky M. W., Lalancette R. A., Fairclough R. H. Structure and function of an acetylcholine receptor. Biophys J. 1982 Jan;37(1):371–383. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(82)84685-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Levitt D. G. Interpretation of biological ion channel flux data--reaction-rate versus continuum theory. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1986;15:29–57. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.15.060186.000333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Levitt D. G. Strong electrolyte continuum theory solution for equilibrium profiles, diffusion limitation, and conductance in charged ion channels. Biophys J. 1985 Jul;48(1):19–31. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(85)83757-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lewis C. A. Ion-concentration dependence of the reversal potential and the single channel conductance of ion channels at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1979 Jan;286:417–445. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lewis C. A., Stevens C. F. Acetylcholine receptor channel ionic selectivity: ions experience an aqueous environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Oct;80(19):6110–6113. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.19.6110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Läuger P., Stephan W., Frehland E. Fluctuations of barrier structure in ionic channels. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1980 Oct 16;602(1):167–180. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(80)90299-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mackay D. H., Berens P. H., Wilson K. R., Hagler A. T. Structure and dynamics of ion transport through gramicidin A. Biophys J. 1984 Aug;46(2):229–248. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84016-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Magleby K. L., Weinstock M. M. Nickel and calcium ions modify the characteristics of the acetylcholine receptor-channel complex at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1980 Feb;299:203–218. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Marchais D., Marty A. Interaction of permeant ions with channels activated by acetylcholine in Aplysia neurones. J Physiol. 1979 Dec;297(0):9–45. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp013025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Matthews-Bellinger J., Salpeter M. M. Distribution of acetylcholine receptors at frog neuromuscular junctions with a discussion of some physiological implications. J Physiol. 1978 Jun;279:197–213. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Mishina M., Tobimatsu T., Imoto K., Tanaka K., Fujita Y., Fukuda K., Kurasaki M., Takahashi H., Morimoto Y., Hirose T. Location of functional regions of acetylcholine receptor alpha-subunit by site-directed mutagenesis. 1985 Jan 31-Feb 6Nature. 313(6001):364–369. doi: 10.1038/313364a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Noda M., Takahashi H., Tanabe T., Toyosato M., Furutani Y., Hirose T., Asai M., Inayama S., Miyata T., Numa S. Primary structure of alpha-subunit precursor of Torpedo californica acetylcholine receptor deduced from cDNA sequence. Nature. 1982 Oct 28;299(5886):793–797. doi: 10.1038/299793a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Noda M., Takahashi H., Tanabe T., Toyosato M., Kikyotani S., Furutani Y., Hirose T., Takashima H., Inayama S., Miyata T. Structural homology of Torpedo californica acetylcholine receptor subunits. Nature. 1983 Apr 7;302(5908):528–532. doi: 10.1038/302528a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Rae J. L., Levis R. A. Patch Clamp Recordings from the Epithelium of the Lens Obtained using Glasses Selected for Low Noise and Improved Sealing Properties. Biophys J. 1984 Jan;45(1):144–146. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84142-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Ratnam M., Nguyen D. L., Rivier J., Sargent P. B., Lindstrom J. Transmembrane topography of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor: immunochemical tests contradict theoretical predictions based on hydrophobicity profiles. Biochemistry. 1986 May 6;25(9):2633–2643. doi: 10.1021/bi00357a052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sanchez J. A., Dani J. A., Siemen D., Hille B. Slow permeation of organic cations in acetylcholine receptor channels. J Gen Physiol. 1986 Jun;87(6):985–1001. doi: 10.1085/jgp.87.6.985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. TAKEUCHI A., TAKEUCHI N. On the permeability of end-plate membrane during the action of transmitter. J Physiol. 1960 Nov;154:52–67. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Takeda K., Gage P. W., Barry P. H. Effects of divalent cations on toad end-plate channels. J Membr Biol. 1982;64(1-2):55–66. doi: 10.1007/BF01870768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Yellen G. Ionic permeation and blockade in Ca2+-activated K+ channels of bovine chromaffin cells. J Gen Physiol. 1984 Aug;84(2):157–186. doi: 10.1085/jgp.84.2.157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES