Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1991 Mar 1;97(3):579–604. doi: 10.1085/jgp.97.3.579

A localized zone of increased conductance progresses over the surface of the sea urchin egg during fertilization

PMCID: PMC2216481  PMID: 2037840

Abstract

Although activation of a sea urchin egg by sperm leads to three phases of membrane conductance increase in the egg, the mechanism by which the sperm causes these conductance changes is not known. We used the loose patch clamp technique to localize the conductance changes in voltage clamped eggs. A patch of the egg's membrane was isolated from the bath by pressing the loose patch clamp pipette against the egg surface. Sperm added to the bath attached to the surface of the egg in a region other than at the isolated membrane patch. During phase 1 of the activation current, no changes of the membrane conductance were detected. At the time of, and subsequent to the onset of phase 2, large currents recorded between the interior of the patch pipette and the bath were attributed to changes of the seal resistance between the surface of the egg and the pipette. A local change of membrane conductance was observed during phase 2 despite the changes of seal resistance. During phase 2, the large amplitude and short duration of the local membrane conductance increase relative to the membrane, conductance increase for the whole egg during phase 2 indicated that the conductance increase occurred over the entire surface of the egg, but not simultaneously. The time when the peak conductance for the membrane patch occurred, relative to the time of onset for phase 2 in the whole egg, depended on the distance, measured in a straight line, between the site of sperm attachment and the tip of the pipette. These data indicate that the localized conductance increase progressed over the surface of the egg from the site of sperm attachment to the opposite pole of the egg. It is proposed that the local conductance increase, the cortical reaction, and the change of seal resistance are all evoked by a common cytoplasmic message that progresses throughout the cytoplasm of the egg from the site of sperm attachment to the opposite pole of the egg.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.9 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ALLEN R. D., GRIFFIN J. L. The time sequence of early events in the fertilization of sea urchin eggs. I. The latent period and the cortical reaction. Exp Cell Res. 1958 Aug;15(1):163–173. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(58)90072-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Antakly T., Eisen H. J. Immunocytochemical localization of glucocorticoid receptor in target cells. Endocrinology. 1984 Nov;115(5):1984–1989. doi: 10.1210/endo-115-5-1984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Busa W. B., Nuccitelli R. An elevated free cytosolic Ca2+ wave follows fertilization in eggs of the frog, Xenopus laevis. J Cell Biol. 1985 Apr;100(4):1325–1329. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.4.1325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chambers E. L., Pressman B. C., Rose B. The activation of sea urchin eggs by the divalent ionophores A23187 and X-537A. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1974 Sep 9;60(1):126–132. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(74)90181-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chambers E. L., de Armendi J. Membrane potential, action potential and activation potential of eggs of the sea urchin, Lytechinus variegatus. Exp Cell Res. 1979 Aug;122(1):203–218. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(79)90575-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Eisen A., Kiehart D. P., Wieland S. J., Reynolds G. T. Temporal sequence and spatial distribution of early events of fertilization in single sea urchin eggs. J Cell Biol. 1984 Nov;99(5):1647–1654. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.5.1647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eisen A., Reynolds G. T. Source and sinks for the calcium released during fertilization of single sea urchin eggs. J Cell Biol. 1985 May;100(5):1522–1527. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.5.1522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Epel D., Weaver A. M., Mazia D. Methods for revoval of the vitelline membrane of sea urchin eggs. I. Use of dithiothreitol (Cleland Reagent). Exp Cell Res. 1970 Jul;61(1):64–68. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(70)90257-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fishman H. M. Patch voltage clamp of squid axon membrane. J Membr Biol. 1975 Dec 4;24(3-4):265–277. doi: 10.1007/BF01868627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hafner M., Petzelt C., Nobiling R., Pawley J. B., Kramp D., Schatten G. Wave of free calcium at fertilization in the sea urchin egg visualized with fura-2. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1988;9(3):271–277. doi: 10.1002/cm.970090309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Igusa Y., Miyazaki S. Periodic increase of cytoplasmic free calcium in fertilized hamster eggs measured with calcium-sensitive electrodes. J Physiol. 1986 Aug;377:193–205. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jaffe L. A. Fast block to polyspermy in sea urchin eggs is electrically mediated. Nature. 1976 May 6;261(5555):68–71. doi: 10.1038/261068a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jaffe L. A., Gould-Somero M., Holland L. Ionic mechanism of the fertilization potential of the marine worm, Urechis caupo (Echiura). J Gen Physiol. 1979 Apr;73(4):469–492. doi: 10.1085/jgp.73.4.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jaffe L. A., Kado R. T., Muncy L. Propagating potassium and chloride conductances during activation and fertilization of the egg of the frog, Rana pipiens. J Physiol. 1985 Nov;368:227–242. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kamel L. C., Bailey J., Schoenbaum L., Kinsey W. Phosphatidylinositol metabolism during fertilization in the sea urchin egg. Lipids. 1985 Jun;20(6):350–356. doi: 10.1007/BF02534201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kline D., Jaffe L. A., Kado R. T. A calcium-activated sodium conductance contributes to the fertilization potential in the egg of the nemertean worm Cerebratulus lacteus. Dev Biol. 1986 Sep;117(1):184–193. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(86)90360-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kline D., Nuccitelli R. The wave of activation current in the Xenopus egg. Dev Biol. 1985 Oct;111(2):471–487. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(85)90499-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kozuka M., Takahashi K. Changes in holding and ion-channel currents during activation of an ascidian egg under voltage clamp. J Physiol. 1982 Feb;323:267–286. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lynn J. W., Chambers E. L. Voltage clamp studies of fertilization in sea urchin eggs. I. Effect of clamped membrane potential on sperm entry, activation, and development. Dev Biol. 1984 Mar;102(1):98–109. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(84)90178-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lynn J. W., McCulloh D. H., Chambers E. L. Voltage clamp studies of fertilization in sea urchin eggs. II. Current patterns in relation to sperm entry, nonentry, and activation. Dev Biol. 1988 Aug;128(2):305–323. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(88)90294-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. McCulloh D. H., Lynn J. W., Chambers E. L. Membrane depolarization facilitates sperm entry, large fertilization cone formation, and prolonged current responses in sea urchin oocytes. Dev Biol. 1987 Nov;124(1):177–190. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(87)90470-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Neher E., Lux H. D. Voltage clamp on Helix pomatia neuronal membrane; current measurement over a limited area of the soma surface. Pflugers Arch. 1969;311(3):272–277. doi: 10.1007/BF00590532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Poenie M., Alderton J., Tsien R. Y., Steinhardt R. A. Changes of free calcium levels with stages of the cell division cycle. Nature. 1985 May 9;315(6015):147–149. doi: 10.1038/315147a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. SUGIYAMA M. Physiological analysis of the cortical response of the sea urchin egg. Exp Cell Res. 1956 Apr;10(2):364–376. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(56)90009-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Schroeder T. E. Expressions of the prefertilization polar axis in sea urchin eggs. Dev Biol. 1980 Oct;79(2):428–443. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(80)90128-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Steinhardt R. A., Lundin L., Mazia D. Bioelectric responses of the echinoderm egg to fertilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Oct;68(10):2426–2430. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.10.2426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Steinhardt R., Zucker R., Schatten G. Intracellular calcium release at fertilization in the sea urchin egg. Dev Biol. 1977 Jul 1;58(1):185–196. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(77)90084-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Swann K., Whitaker M. The part played by inositol trisphosphate and calcium in the propagation of the fertilization wave in sea urchin eggs. J Cell Biol. 1986 Dec;103(6 Pt 1):2333–2342. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.6.2333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Turner P. R., Sheetz M. P., Jaffe L. A. Fertilization increases the polyphosphoinositide content of sea urchin eggs. Nature. 1984 Aug 2;310(5976):414–415. doi: 10.1038/310414a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Whitaker M. J., Steinhardt R. A. Evidence in support of the hypothesis of an electrically mediated fast block to polyspermy in sea urchin eggs. Dev Biol. 1983 Jan;95(1):244–248. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(83)90024-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wilson W. A., Goldner M. M. Voltage clamping with a single microelectrode. J Neurobiol. 1975 Jul;6(4):411–422. doi: 10.1002/neu.480060406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. YAMAMOTO T. O. Physiology of fertilization in fish eggs. Int Rev Cytol. 1961;12:361–405. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)60545-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES