Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1993 Mar 1;101(3):425–451. doi: 10.1085/jgp.101.3.425

Effects of sulfhydryl inhibitors on nonlinear membrane currents in frog skeletal muscle fibers

PMCID: PMC2216769  PMID: 7682597

Abstract

The effect of sulhydryl reagents on nonlinear membrane currents of frog skeletal muscle fibers has been studied using the triple Vaseline gap voltage-clamp technique. These compounds, which are known to interfere with depolarization contraction coupling, also appear to diminish intramembranous charge movement recorded with fibers polarized to -100 mV (charge 1). This effect, however, is accompanied by changes in the fiber membrane conductance and in most cases by the appearance of an inwardly directed current in the potential range between -60 and +20 mV. This current is reduced by both cadmium and nifedipine and does not occur in Ca-free solution, suggesting that it is carried by calcium ions flowing through regular calcium channels that are more easily activated in the presence of SH reagent. These changes in the membrane electrical active and passive properties decrease the quality and reliability of the P/n pulse subtracting procedure normally used for charge movement measurements. These effects can be substantially reduced by cadmium ions (0.1 mM), which has no effect on charge movement. When SH reagents are applied in the presence of cadmium, no effects are observed, indicating that this cation may protect the membrane from the reagent effects. The effects of -SH reagents can be observed by applying them in the absence of cadmium, followed by addition of the cation. Under these conditions the conductance changes are reversed and the effects of the SH reagents on charge movement can be measured with a higher degree of confidence. Maximum charge is reduced by 32% in the presence of 1.5 mM PCMB and by 31% in the presence of 2 mM PHMPS. These effects do not occur in the presence of DTT and in some cases they may be reversed by this agent. Charge 2, recorded in depolarized muscle fibers, is also reduced by these agents.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bezanilla F., Taylor R. E., Fernández J. M. Distribution and kinetics of membrane dielectric polarization. 1. Long-term inactivation of gating currents. J Gen Physiol. 1982 Jan;79(1):21–40. doi: 10.1085/jgp.79.1.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brum G., Fitts R., Pizarro G., Ríos E. Voltage sensors of the frog skeletal muscle membrane require calcium to function in excitation-contraction coupling. J Physiol. 1988 Apr;398:475–505. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brum G., Rios E. Intramembrane charge movement in frog skeletal muscle fibres. Properties of charge 2. J Physiol. 1987 Jun;387:489–517. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Caputo C., Bolaños P. Effects of D-600 on intramembrane charge movement of polarized and depolarized frog muscle fibers. J Gen Physiol. 1989 Jul;94(1):43–64. doi: 10.1085/jgp.94.1.43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Caputo C., Bolaños P., Gonzalez A. Effects of sulfhydryl inhibitors on depolarizations-contraction coupling in frog skeletal muscle fibers. J Gen Physiol. 1993 Mar;101(3):411–424. doi: 10.1085/jgp.101.3.411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chandler W. K., Rakowski R. F., Schneider M. F. Effects of glycerol treatment and maintained depolarization on charge movement in skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1976 Jan;254(2):285–316. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cheung W. Y. Calmodulin and its activation by cadmium ion. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1988;522:74–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb33345.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Drews G., Rack M. Modification of sodium and gating currents by amino group specific cross-linking and monofunctional reagents. Biophys J. 1988 Sep;54(3):383–391. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(88)82971-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Etter E. F. The effect of phenylglyoxal on contraction and intramembrane charge movement in frog skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1990 Feb;421:441–462. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp017954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gomolla M., Gottschalk G., Lüttgau H. C. Perchlorate-induced alterations in electrical and mechanical parameters of frog skeletal muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1983 Oct;343:197–214. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hille B., Campbell D. T. An improved vaseline gap voltage clamp for skeletal muscle fibers. J Gen Physiol. 1976 Mar;67(3):265–293. doi: 10.1085/jgp.67.3.265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hui C. S. Factors affecting the appearance of the hump charge movement component in frog cut twitch fibers. J Gen Physiol. 1991 Aug;98(2):315–347. doi: 10.1085/jgp.98.2.315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Huneeus-Cox F., Fernandez H. L., Smith B. H. Effects of redox and sulfhydryl reagents on the bioelectric properties of the giant axon of the squid. Biophys J. 1966 Sep;6(5):675–689. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(66)86686-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jacobson K. B., Turner J. E. The interaction of cadmium and certain other metal ions with proteins and nucleic acids. Toxicology. 1980;16(1):1–37. doi: 10.1016/0300-483x(80)90107-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kirsten E. B., Kuperman A. S. Effects of sulphydryl inhibitors on frog sartorius muscle: p-chloromercuribenzenesulphonic acid. Br J Pharmacol. 1970 Dec;40(4):814–826. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1970.tb10657.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lamb G. D. Asymmetric charge movement in polarized and depolarized muscle fibres of the rabbit. J Physiol. 1987 Feb;383:349–367. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lamb G. D. Ca2+ channels or voltage sensors? Nature. 1991 Jul 11;352(6331):113–113. doi: 10.1038/352113b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Meves H., Rubly N., Stämpfli R. The action of arginine-specific reagents on ionic and gating currents in frog myelinated nerve. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1988 Aug 4;943(1):1–12. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(88)90340-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pizarro G., Csernoch L., Uribe I., Rodríguez M., Ríos E. The relationship between Q gamma and Ca release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum in skeletal muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1991 May;97(5):913–947. doi: 10.1085/jgp.97.5.913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rack M., Woll K. H. Effects of chemical modification of carboxyl groups on the voltage-clamped nerve fiber of the frog. J Membr Biol. 1984;82(1):41–48. doi: 10.1007/BF01870730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rios E., Brum G. Involvement of dihydropyridine receptors in excitation-contraction coupling in skeletal muscle. Nature. 1987 Feb 19;325(6106):717–720. doi: 10.1038/325717a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. SMITH H. M. Effects of sulfhydryl blockade on axonal function. J Cell Physiol. 1958 Apr;51(2):161–171. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1030510203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Schneider M. F., Chandler W. K. Voltage dependent charge movement of skeletal muscle: a possible step in excitation-contraction coupling. Nature. 1973 Mar 23;242(5395):244–246. doi: 10.1038/242244a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Schwartz L. M., McCleskey E. W., Almers W. Dihydropyridine receptors in muscle are voltage-dependent but most are not functional calcium channels. 1985 Apr 25-May 1Nature. 314(6013):747–751. doi: 10.1038/314747a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Shrager P. Slow sodium inactivation in nerve after exposure to sulhydryl blocking reagents. J Gen Physiol. 1977 Feb;69(2):183–202. doi: 10.1085/jgp.69.2.183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tanabe T., Beam K. G., Adams B. A., Niidome T., Numa S. Regions of the skeletal muscle dihydropyridine receptor critical for excitation-contraction coupling. Nature. 1990 Aug 9;346(6284):567–569. doi: 10.1038/346567a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tanabe T., Beam K. G., Powell J. A., Numa S. Restoration of excitation-contraction coupling and slow calcium current in dysgenic muscle by dihydropyridine receptor complementary DNA. Nature. 1988 Nov 10;336(6195):134–139. doi: 10.1038/336134a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tanabe T., Takeshima H., Mikami A., Flockerzi V., Takahashi H., Kangawa K., Kojima M., Matsuo H., Hirose T., Numa S. Primary structure of the receptor for calcium channel blockers from skeletal muscle. Nature. 1987 Jul 23;328(6128):313–318. doi: 10.1038/328313a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES