Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1995 Jan 1;105(1):73–94. doi: 10.1085/jgp.105.1.73

Plasticity in canine airway smooth muscle

PMCID: PMC2216929  PMID: 7730790

Abstract

The large volume changes of some hollow viscera require a greater length range for the smooth muscle of their walls than can be accommodated by a fixed array of sliding filaments. A possible explanation is that smooth muscles adapt to length changes by forming variable numbers of contractile units in series. To test for such plasticity we examined the muscle length dependence of shortening velocity and compliance, both of which will vary directly with the number of thick filaments in series. Dog tracheal smooth muscle was studied because its cells are arrayed in long, straight, parallel bundles that span the length of the preparation. In experiments where muscle length was changed, both compliance and velocity showed a strong dependence on muscle length, varying by 1.7-fold and 2.2-fold, respectively, over a threefold range of length. The variation in isometric force was substantially less, ranging from a 1.2- to 1.3-fold in two series of experiments where length was varied by twofold to an insignificant 4% variation in a third series where a threefold length range was studied. Tetanic force was below its steady level after both stretches and releases, and increased to a steady level with 5-6 tetani at 5 min intervals. These results suggest strongly that the number of contractile units in series varies directly with the adapted muscle length. Temporary force depression after a length change would occur if the change transiently moved the filaments from their optimum overlap. The relative length independence of the adapted force is explained by the reforming of the filament lattice to produce optimum force development, with commensurate changes of velocity and compliance.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adelstein R. S., Eisenberg E. Regulation and kinetics of the actin-myosin-ATP interaction. Annu Rev Biochem. 1980;49:921–956. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.49.070180.004421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chiu Y. C., Walley K. R., Ford L. E. Comparison of the effects of different inotropic interventions on force, velocity, and power in rabbit myocardium. Circ Res. 1989 Nov;65(5):1161–1171. doi: 10.1161/01.res.65.5.1161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chiu Y. L., Asayama J., Ford L. E. A sensitive photoelectric force transducer with a resonant frequency of 6 kHz. Am J Physiol. 1982 Nov;243(5):C299–C302. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1982.243.5.C299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chiu Y. L., Ballou E. W., Ford L. E. Internal viscoelastic loading in cat papillary muscle. Biophys J. 1982 Nov;40(2):109–120. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(82)84465-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cooke P. H., Fay F. S. Thick myofilaments in contracted and relaxed mammalian smooth muscle cells. Exp Cell Res. 1972;71(2):265–272. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(72)90292-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Craig R., Smith R., Kendrick-Jones J. Light-chain phosphorylation controls the conformation of vertebrate non-muscle and smooth muscle myosin molecules. 1983 Mar 31-Apr 6Nature. 302(5907):436–439. doi: 10.1038/302436a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Edman K. A., Mulieri L. A., Scubon-Mulieri B. Non-hyperbolic force-velocity relationship in single muscle fibres. Acta Physiol Scand. 1976 Oct;98(2):143–156. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1976.tb00234.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ford L. E., Huxley A. F., Simmons R. M. Tension responses to sudden length change in stimulated frog muscle fibres near slack length. J Physiol. 1977 Jul;269(2):441–515. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Forman R., Ford L. E., Sonnenblick E. H. Effect of muscle length on the force-velocity relationship of tetanized cardiac muscle. Circ Res. 1972 Aug;31(2):195–206. doi: 10.1161/01.res.31.2.195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Garamvölgyi N., Vizi E. S., Knoll J. The regular occurrence of thick filaments in stretched mammalian smooth muscle. J Ultrastruct Res. 1971 Jan;34(1):135–143. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(71)90009-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Garamvölgyi N., Vizi E. S., Knoll J. The site and state of myosin in intestinal smooth muscle. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1973 Mar 15;265(867):219–222. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1973.0026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gillis J. M., Cao M. L., Godfraind-De Becker A. Density of myosin filaments in the rat anococcygeus muscle, at rest and in contraction. II. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 1988 Feb;9(1):18–29. doi: 10.1007/BF01682145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Godfraind-De Becker A., Gillis J. M. Analysis of the birefringence of the smooth muscle anococcygeus of the rat, at rest and in contraction. I. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 1988 Feb;9(1):9–17. doi: 10.1007/BF01682144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gordon A. M., Huxley A. F., Julian F. J. The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1966 May;184(1):170–192. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Harris D. E., Warshaw D. M. Length vs. active force relationship in single isolated smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol. 1991 May;260(5 Pt 1):C1104–C1112. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1991.260.5.C1104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kelly R. E., Rice R. V. Localization of myosin filaments in smooth muscle. J Cell Biol. 1968 Apr;37(1):105–116. doi: 10.1083/jcb.37.1.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Onishi H., Wakabayashi T. Electron microscopic studies of myosin molecules from chicken gizzard muscle I: the formation of the intramolecular loop in the myosin tail. J Biochem. 1982 Sep;92(3):871–879. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a134001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rack P. M., Westbury D. R. The effects of length and stimulus rate on tension in the isometric cat soleus muscle. J Physiol. 1969 Oct;204(2):443–460. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rasmussen H., Takuwa Y., Park S. Protein kinase C in the regulation of smooth muscle contraction. FASEB J. 1987 Sep;1(3):177–185. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rice R. V., Moses J. A., McManus G. M., Brady A. C., Blasik L. M. The organization of contractile filaments in a mammalian smooth muscle. J Cell Biol. 1970 Oct;47(1):183–196. doi: 10.1083/jcb.47.1.183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shoenberg C. F., Needham D. M. A study of the mechanism of contraction in vertebrate smooth muscle. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1976 Feb;51(1):53–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1976.tb01120.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sobieszek A. Ca-linked phosphorylation of a light chain of vertebrate smooth-muscle myosin. Eur J Biochem. 1977 Mar 1;73(2):477–483. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1977.tb11340.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Somlyo A. P., Devine C. E., Somlyo A. V., Rice R. V. Filament organization in vertebrate smooth muscle. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1973 Mar 15;265(867):223–229. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1973.0027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Somlyo A. V., Butler T. M., Bond M., Somlyo A. P. Myosin filaments have non-phosphorylated light chains in relaxed smooth muscle. Nature. 1981 Dec 10;294(5841):567–569. doi: 10.1038/294567a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Stephens N. L., Kroeger E., Mehta J. A. Force-velocity characteristics of respiratory airway smooth muscle. J Appl Physiol. 1969 Jun;26(6):685–692. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1969.26.6.685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Trybus K. M., Huiatt T. W., Lowey S. A bent monomeric conformation of myosin from smooth muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Oct;79(20):6151–6155. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.20.6151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Watanabe M., Takemori S., Yagi N. X-ray diffraction study on mammalian visceral smooth muscles in resting and activated states. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 1993 Oct;14(5):469–475. doi: 10.1007/BF00297209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Winton F. R. The influence of length on the responses of unstriated muscle to electrical and chemical stimulation, and stretching. J Physiol. 1926 Jun 22;61(3):368–382. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1926.sp002300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES