Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1996 Mar 1;107(3):369–379. doi: 10.1085/jgp.107.3.369

Voltage-jump relaxation kinetics for wild-type and chimeric beta subunits of neuronal nicotinic receptors

PMCID: PMC2216994  PMID: 8868048

Abstract

We have studied the voltage-jump relaxation currents for a series of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors resulting from the coexpression of wild-type and chimeric beta 4/beta 2 subunits with alpha 3 subunits in Xenopus oocytes. With acetylcholine as the agonist, the wild-type alpha 3 beta 4 receptors displayed five- to eightfold slower voltage-jump relaxations than did the wild-type alpha 3 beta 2 receptors. In both cases, the relaxations could best be described by two exponential components of approximately equal amplitudes over a wide range of [ACh]'s. Relaxation rate constants increased with [ACh] and saturated at 20- to 30-fold lower concentrations for the alpha 3 beta 2 receptor than for the alpha 3 beta 4 receptor, as observed previously for the peak steady state conductance. Furthermore, the chimeric beta 4/beta 2 subunits showed a transition in the concentration dependence of the rate constants in the region between residues 94 and 109, analogous to our previous observation with steady state conductances. However, our experiments with a series of beta- subunit chimeras did not localize residues that govern the absolute value of the kinetic parameters. Hill coefficients for the relaxations also differed from those previously measured for steady state responses. The data reinforce previous conclusions that the region between residues 94 and 109 on the beta subunit plays a role in binding agonist but also show that other regions of the receptor control gating kinetics subsequent to the binding step.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams P. R. Acetylcholine receptor kinetics. J Membr Biol. 1981 Feb 28;58(3):161–174. doi: 10.1007/BF01870902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams P. R. Kinetics of agonist conductance changes during hyperolarization at frog endplates. Br J Pharmacol. 1975 Feb;53(2):308–310. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1975.tb07364.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bertrand D., Devillers-Thiéry A., Revah F., Galzi J. L., Hussy N., Mulle C., Bertrand S., Ballivet M., Changeux J. P. Unconventional pharmacology of a neuronal nicotinic receptor mutated in the channel domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Feb 15;89(4):1261–1265. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.4.1261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Charnet P., Labarca C., Cohen B. N., Davidson N., Lester H. A., Pilar G. Pharmacological and kinetic properties of alpha 4 beta 2 neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. J Physiol. 1992 May;450:375–394. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Charnet P., Labarca C., Leonard R. J., Vogelaar N. J., Czyzyk L., Gouin A., Davidson N., Lester H. A. An open-channel blocker interacts with adjacent turns of alpha-helices in the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Neuron. 1990 Jan;4(1):87–95. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(90)90445-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cohen B. N., Figl A., Quick M. W., Labarca C., Davidson N., Lester H. A. Regions of beta 2 and beta 4 responsible for differences between the steady state dose-response relationships of the alpha 3 beta 2 and alpha 3 beta 4 neuronal nicotinic receptors. J Gen Physiol. 1995 Jun;105(6):745–764. doi: 10.1085/jgp.105.6.745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Colquhoun D., Hawkes A. G. On the stochastic properties of single ion channels. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1981 Mar 6;211(1183):205–235. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1981.0003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Derkach V. A., North R. A., Selyanko A. A., Skok V. I. Single channels activated by acetylcholine in rat superior cervical ganglion. J Physiol. 1987 Jul;388:141–151. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Figl A., Cohen B. N., Quick M. W., Davidson N., Lester H. A. Regions of beta 4.beta 2 subunit chimeras that contribute to the agonist selectivity of neuronal nicotinic receptors. FEBS Lett. 1992 Aug 24;308(3):245–248. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(92)81284-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Guastella J., Nelson N., Nelson H., Czyzyk L., Keynan S., Miedel M. C., Davidson N., Lester H. A., Kanner B. I. Cloning and expression of a rat brain GABA transporter. Science. 1990 Sep 14;249(4974):1303–1306. doi: 10.1126/science.1975955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ifune C. K., Steinbach J. H. Inward rectification of acetylcholine-elicited currents in rat phaeochromocytoma cells. J Physiol. 1992 Nov;457:143–165. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ifune C. K., Steinbach J. H. Rectification of acetylcholine-elicited currents in PC12 pheochromocytoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jun;87(12):4794–4798. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.12.4794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Labarca C., Nowak M. W., Zhang H., Tang L., Deshpande P., Lester H. A. Channel gating governed symmetrically by conserved leucine residues in the M2 domain of nicotinic receptors. Nature. 1995 Aug 10;376(6540):514–516. doi: 10.1038/376514a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lester H. A. The permeation pathway of neurotransmitter-gated ion channels. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1992;21:267–292. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.21.060192.001411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Luetje C. W., Patrick J. Both alpha- and beta-subunits contribute to the agonist sensitivity of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. J Neurosci. 1991 Mar;11(3):837–845. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.11-03-00837.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Luetje C. W., Wada K., Rogers S., Abramson S. N., Tsuji K., Heinemann S., Patrick J. Neurotoxins distinguish between different neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit combinations. J Neurochem. 1990 Aug;55(2):632–640. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1990.tb04180.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Maconochie D. J., Knight D. E. A study of the bovine adrenal chromaffin nicotinic receptor using patch clamp and concentration-jump techniques. J Physiol. 1992 Aug;454:129–153. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Magleby K. L., Stevens C. F. The effect of voltage on the time course of end-plate currents. J Physiol. 1972 May;223(1):151–171. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mathie A., Colquhoun D., Cull-Candy S. G. Rectification of currents activated by nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in rat sympathetic ganglion neurones. J Physiol. 1990 Aug;427:625–655. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp018191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mathie A., Cull-Candy S. G., Colquhoun D. Single-channel and whole-cell currents evoked by acetylcholine in dissociated sympathetic neurons of the rat. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1987 Nov 23;232(1267):239–248. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1987.0072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mulle C., Léna C., Changeux J. P. Potentiation of nicotinic receptor response by external calcium in rat central neurons. Neuron. 1992 May;8(5):937–945. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90208-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Neher E., Sakmann B. Voltage-dependence of drug-induced conductance in frog neuromuscular junction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Jun;72(6):2140–2144. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.6.2140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Papke R. L., Boulter J., Patrick J., Heinemann S. Single-channel currents of rat neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Neuron. 1989 Nov;3(5):589–596. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(89)90269-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Papke R. L., Duvoisin R. M., Heinemann S. F. The amino terminal half of the nicotinic beta-subunit extracellular domain regulates the kinetics of inhibition by neuronal bungarotoxin. Proc Biol Sci. 1993 May 22;252(1334):141–148. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1993.0058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Papke R. L., Heinemann S. F. The role of the beta 4-subunit in determining the kinetic properties of rat neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine alpha 3-receptors. J Physiol. 1991;440:95–112. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Papke R. L. The kinetic properties of neuronal nicotinic receptors: genetic basis of functional diversity. Prog Neurobiol. 1993 Oct;41(4):509–531. doi: 10.1016/0301-0082(93)90028-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rang H. P. The characteristics of synaptic currents and responses to acetylcholine of rat submandibular ganglion cells. J Physiol. 1981 Feb;311:23–55. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Revah F., Bertrand D., Galzi J. L., Devillers-Thiéry A., Mulle C., Hussy N., Bertrand S., Ballivet M., Changeux J. P. Mutations in the channel domain alter desensitization of a neuronal nicotinic receptor. Nature. 1991 Oct 31;353(6347):846–849. doi: 10.1038/353846a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Role L. W. Diversity in primary structure and function of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor channels. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1992 Jun;2(3):254–262. doi: 10.1016/0959-4388(92)90112-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sands S. B., Barish M. E. Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor currents in phaeochromocytoma (PC12) cells: dual mechanisms of rectification. J Physiol. 1992 Feb;447:467–487. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sargent P. B. The diversity of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1993;16:403–443. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.16.030193.002155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sheridan R. E., Lester H. A. Relaxation measurements on the acetylcholine receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Sep;72(9):3496–3500. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.9.3496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Vernino S., Amador M., Luetje C. W., Patrick J., Dani J. A. Calcium modulation and high calcium permeability of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Neuron. 1992 Jan;8(1):127–134. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90114-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Zingsheim H. P., Neugebauer D. C., Frank J., Hänicke W., Barrantes F. J. Dimeric arrangement and structure of the membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor studied by electron microscopy. EMBO J. 1982;1(5):541–547. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01206.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES