Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1988 Jun 1;91(6):761–779. doi: 10.1085/jgp.91.6.761

Characterization of cross-bridge elasticity and kinetics of cross-bridge cycling during force development in single smooth muscle cells

DM Warshaw, DD Rees, FS Fay
PMCID: PMC2217628  PMID: 3047311

Abstract

Force development in smooth muscle, as in skeletal muscle, is believed to reflect recruitment of force-generating myosin cross-bridges. However, little is known about the events underlying cross-bridge recruitment as the muscle cell approaches peak isometric force and then enters a period of tension maintenance. In the present studies on single smooth muscle cells isolated from the toad (Bufo marinus) stomach muscularis, active muscle stiffness, calculated from the force response to small sinusoidal length changes (0.5% cell length, 250 Hz), was utilized to estimate the relative number of attached cross-bridges. By comparing stiffness during initial force development to stiffness during force redevelopment immediately after a quick release imposed at peak force, we propose that the instantaneous active stiffness of the cell reflects both a linearly elastic cross-bridge element having 1.5 times the compliance of the cross-bridge in frog skeletal muscle and a series elastic component having an exponential length-force relationship. At the onset of force development, the ratio of stiffness to force was 2.5 times greater than at peak isometric force. These data suggest that, upon activation, cross-bridges attach in at least two states (i.e., low-force-producing and high-force-producing) and redistribute to a steady state distribution at peak isometric force. The possibility that the cross-bridge cycling rate was modulated with time was also investigated by analyzing the time course of tension recovery to small, rapid step length changes (0.5% cell length in 2.5 ms) imposed during initial force development, at peak force, and after 15 s of tension maintenance. The rate of tension recovery slowed continuously throughout force development following activation and slowed further as force was maintained. Our results suggest that the kinetics of force production in smooth muscle may involve a redistribution of cross-bridge populations between two attached states and that the average cycling rate of these cross-bridges becomes slower with time during contraction.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bond M., Somlyo A. V. Dense bodies and actin polarity in vertebrate smooth muscle. J Cell Biol. 1982 Nov;95(2 Pt 1):403–413. doi: 10.1083/jcb.95.2.403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bressler B. H., Clinch N. F. The compliance of contracting skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1974 Mar;237(3):477–493. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Butler T. M., Siegman M. J., Mooers S. U. Slowing of cross-bridge cycling in smooth muscle without evidence of an internal load. Am J Physiol. 1986 Dec;251(6 Pt 1):C945–C950. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1986.251.6.C945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cecchi G., Griffiths P. J., Taylor S. Muscular contraction: kinetics of crossbridge attachment studied by high-frequency stiffness measurements. Science. 1982 Jul 2;217(4554):70–72. doi: 10.1126/science.6979780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cooke P. H., Fay F. S. Correlation between fiber length, ultrastructure, and the length-tension relationship of mammalian smooth muscle. J Cell Biol. 1972 Jan;52(1):105–116. doi: 10.1083/jcb.52.1.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dillon P. F., Aksoy M. O., Driska S. P., Murphy R. A. Myosin phosphorylation and the cross-bridge cycle in arterial smooth muscle. Science. 1981 Jan 30;211(4481):495–497. doi: 10.1126/science.6893872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dillon P. F., Murphy R. A. High force development and crossbridge attachment in smooth muscle from swine carotid arteries. Circ Res. 1982 Jun;50(6):799–804. doi: 10.1161/01.res.50.6.799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Eisenberg E., Hill T. L., Chen Y. Cross-bridge model of muscle contraction. Quantitative analysis. Biophys J. 1980 Feb;29(2):195–227. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(80)85126-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fay F. S., Hoffmann R., Leclair S., Merriam P. Preparation of individual smooth muscle cells from the stomach of Bufo marinus. Methods Enzymol. 1982;85(Pt B):284–292. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(82)85027-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ford L. E., Huxley A. F., Simmons R. M. Tension responses to sudden length change in stimulated frog muscle fibres near slack length. J Physiol. 1977 Jul;269(2):441–515. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ford L. E., Huxley A. F., Simmons R. M. Tension transients during the rise of tetanic tension in frog muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1986 Mar;372:595–609. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Güth K., Junge J. Low Ca2+ impedes cross-bridge detachment in chemically skinned Taenia coli. Nature. 1982 Dec 23;300(5894):775–776. doi: 10.1038/300775a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Huxley A. F., Simmons R. M. Proposed mechanism of force generation in striated muscle. Nature. 1971 Oct 22;233(5321):533–538. doi: 10.1038/233533a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Julian F. J., Morgan D. L. Variation of muscle stiffness with tension during tension transients and constant velocity shortening in the frog. J Physiol. 1981;319:193–203. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kamm K. E., Stull J. T. Activation of smooth muscle contraction: relation between myosin phosphorylation and stiffness. Science. 1986 Apr 4;232(4746):80–82. doi: 10.1126/science.3754063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kawai M., Brandt P. W. Sinusoidal analysis: a high resolution method for correlating biochemical reactions with physiological processes in activated skeletal muscles of rabbit, frog and crayfish. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 1980 Sep;1(3):279–303. doi: 10.1007/BF00711932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Meiss R. A. Dynamic stiffness of rabbit mesotubarium smooth muscle: effect of isometric length. Am J Physiol. 1978 Jan;234(1):C14–C26. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1978.234.1.C14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mulvany M. J. Mechanical properties of frog skeletal muscles in iodoacetic acid rigor. J Physiol. 1975 Nov;252(2):319–334. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Murphy R. A., Aksoy M. O., Dillon P. F., Gerthoffer W. T., Kamm K. E. The role of myosin light chain phosphorylation in regulation of the cross-bridge cycle. Fed Proc. 1983 Jan;42(1):51–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Paul R. J., Glück E., Rüegg J. C. Cross bridge ATP utilization in arterial smooth muscle. Pflugers Arch. 1976 Feb 24;361(3):297–299. doi: 10.1007/BF00587295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Siegman M. J., Butler T. M., Mooers S. U., Davies R. E. Chemical energetics of force development, force maintenance, and relaxation in mammalian smooth muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1980 Nov;76(5):609–629. doi: 10.1085/jgp.76.5.609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Siegman M. J., Butler T. M., Mooers S. U., Davies R. E. Crossbridge attachment, resistance to stretch, and viscoelasticity in resting mammalian smooth muscle. Science. 1976 Jan 30;191(4225):383–385. doi: 10.1126/science.128819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Warshaw D. M., Fay F. S. Cross-bridge elasticity in single smooth muscle cells. J Gen Physiol. 1983 Aug;82(2):157–199. doi: 10.1085/jgp.82.2.157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Warshaw D. M., Fay F. S. Tension transients in single isolated smooth muscle cells. Science. 1983 Mar 25;219(4591):1438–1441. doi: 10.1126/science.6828870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Warshaw D. M. Force: velocity relationship in single isolated toad stomach smooth muscle cells. J Gen Physiol. 1987 May;89(5):771–789. doi: 10.1085/jgp.89.5.771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES