Skip to main content
The Journal of Hygiene logoLink to The Journal of Hygiene
. 1955 Jun;53(2):133–142. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400000619

Passive protection experiments with brucella antisera

D Sulitzeanu
PMCID: PMC2217827  PMID: 14392312

Full text

PDF
133

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ELBERG S., HERZBERG M., SCHNEIDER P., SILVERMAN S. J., MEYER K. F. Studies on the immunization of guinea pigs and mice to Brucella infection by means of the "native antigen". J Immunol. 1951 Jul;67(1):1–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. LIVE I., GUILIANI L. A. Protective effect of sera from animals treated with different Brucella antigens upon Brucella infection in mice. J Immunol. 1953 Oct;71(4):187–191. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. OLITZKI A. L., SULITZEANU D. The use of streptomycin-resistant and nonresistant strains for the determination of the immunizing effect of living Brucella abortus vaccines in white mice. J Infect Dis. 1954 May-Jun;94(3):213–224. doi: 10.1093/infdis/94.3.213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. OLITZKI A. L., SZENBERG E. Toxicity, infectivity and antigenicity of a streptomycin dependent mutant of Brucella abortus, strain 19. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1953 Mar;82(3):539–541. doi: 10.3181/00379727-82-20172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. OLITZKI L., OREN R. Protective effect of cattle sera on white mice infected with Brucella abortus with the aid of the mucin technic. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1950 Apr;73(4):617–618. doi: 10.3181/00379727-73-17763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. WHITE P. G., WILSON J. B. Differentiation of smooth and nonsmooth colonies of Brucellae. J Bacteriol. 1951 Feb;61(2):239–240. doi: 10.1128/jb.61.2.239-240.1951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Hygiene are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES