Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Canadian Family Physician logoLink to Canadian Family Physician
. 1987 May;33:1163-1165, 1167, 1169-1171.

Analysis of 275 Planned and 10 Unplanned Home Births

Gerd Schneider, Bobbi Soderstrom
PMCID: PMC2218525  PMID: 21263928

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe the outcome in one family practice of planned home births attended by a physician and an experienced birth assistant in a self-selected, but subsequently screened, population over an 11-year period. All but 26 primigravidas were screened out, as were multiple pregnancies and malpresentations. Study parameters included characteristics of the population and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Of 275 intended home confinements, nine were screened out for medical reasons before labour, five in very early labour, and three for failure to progress. Of the 273 who delivered at home, including 10 unplanned births, two were transferred to hospital for postpartum hemorrhage. One neonate was hospitalized for complications. The results of this study, as well as a review of the relevant literature, illustrate that, for a selected population, home birth is a reasonable alternative to hospital.

Keywords: home birth, delivery, obstetrics

Full text

PDF
1163

Images in this article

1164p1164-a
on p.1164
1165p1165-a
on p.1165

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arroll B. Episiotomy in low risk patients. Can Fam Physician. 1984 Oct;30:2137–2140. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barron S. L., Thomson A. M., Philips P. R. Home and hospital confinement in Newcastle upon Tyne, 1960 to 1969. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1977 Jun;84(6):401–411. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1977.tb12614.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burnett C. A., 3rd, Jones J. A., Rooks J., Chen C. H., Tyler C. W., Jr, Miller C. A. Home delivery and neonatal mortality in North Carolina. JAMA. 1980 Dec 19;244(24):2741–2745. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Caldeyro-Barcia R., Giussi G., Storch E., Poseiro J. J., Lafaurie N., Kettenhuber K., Ballejo G. The bearing-down efforts and their effects on fetal heart rate, oxygenation and acid base balance. J Perinat Med. 1981;9 (Suppl 1):63–67. doi: 10.1515/jpme.1981.9.s1.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cameron J., Chase E. S., O'Neal S. Home birth in Salt Lake County, Utah. Am J Public Health. 1979 Jul;69(7):716–717. doi: 10.2105/ajph.69.7.716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Campbell R., Davies I. M., Macfarlane A., Beral V. Home births in England and Wales, 1979: perinatal mortality according to intended place of delivery. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Sep 22;289(6447):721–724. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6447.721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Campbell R., MacFarlane A. Place of delivery: a review. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986 Jul;93(7):675–683. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chalmers I., Zlosnik J. E., Johns K. A., Campbell H. Obstetric practice and outcome of pregnancy in Cardiff residents 1965-73. Br Med J. 1976 Mar 27;1(6012):735–738. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6012.735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Damstra-Wijmenga S. M. Home confinement: the positive results in Holland. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1984 Aug;34(265):425–430. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. DeJong R. N., Jr, Shy K. K., Carr K. C. An out-of-hospital birth center using university referral. Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Dec;58(6):703–707. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gordon H., Logue M. Perineal muscle function after childbirth. Lancet. 1985 Jul 20;2(8447):123–125. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)90227-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hinds M. W., Bergeisen G. H., Allen D. T. Neonatal outcome in planned v unplanned out-of-hospital births in Kentucky. JAMA. 1985 Mar 15;253(11):1578–1582. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Huygen F. J. Home deliveries in Holland. Dutch maternity care and home confinements. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1976 Apr;26(165):244–248. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Klein M., Lloyd I., Redman C., Bull M., Turnbull A. C. A comparison of low-risk pregnant women booked for delivery in two systems of care: shared-care (consultant) and integrated general practice unit. II. Labour and delivery management and neonatal outcome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983 Feb;90(2):123–128. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1983.tb08895.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Koehler N. U., Solomon D. A., Murphy M. Outcomes of a rural Sonoma County home birth practice: 1976-1982. Birth. 1984 Fall;11(3):165–170. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536x.1984.tb00771.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mehl L. E., Peterson G. H., Whitt M., Hawes W. E. Outcomes of elective home births: a series of 1,146 cases. J Reprod Med. 1977 Nov;19(5):281–290. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Meis P. J., Hall M., 3rd, Marshall J. R., Hobel C. J. Meconium passage: a new classification for risk assessment during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978 Jul 1;131(5):509–513. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(78)90111-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Murphy J. F., Dauncey M., Gray O. P., Chalmers I. Planned and unplanned deliveries at home: implications of a changing ratio. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 May 12;288(6428):1429–1432. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6428.1429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Scherjon S. A comparison between the organization of obstetrics in Denmark and The Netherlands. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986 Jul;93(7):684–689. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Shy K. K., Frost F., Ullom J. Out-of-hospital delivery in Washington State, 1975 to 1977. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Jul 1;137(5):547–552. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(80)90694-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Simmons R., Bernstein S. Out-of-hospital births in Michigan, 1972-79: trends and implications for the safety of planned home deliveries. Public Health Rep. 1983 Mar-Apr;98(2):161–170. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sosa R., Kennell J., Klaus M., Robertson S., Urrutia J. The effect of a supportive companion on perinatal problems, length of labor, and mother-infant interaction. N Engl J Med. 1980 Sep 11;303(11):597–600. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198009113031101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sullivan D. A., Beeman R. Four years' experience with home birth by licensed midwives in Arizona. Am J Public Health. 1983 Jun;73(6):641–645. doi: 10.2105/ajph.73.6.641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tew M. Place of birth and perinatal mortality. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1985 Aug;35(277):390–394. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Treffers P. E., Laan R. Regional perinatal mortality and regional hospitalization at delivery in The Netherlands. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986 Jul;93(7):690–693. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. de Haan J., Smits F. Home deliveries in The Netherlands. Present situation and sequelae. J Perinat Med. 1983;11(1):3–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Family Physician are provided here courtesy of College of Family Physicians of Canada

RESOURCES