Skip to main content
Canadian Family Physician logoLink to Canadian Family Physician
. 1988 Aug;34:1749–1752.

Vasectomies: Motivations and Attitude of Physicians-as-Patients

Philip M Alderman
PMCID: PMC2218951  PMID: 21253074

Abstract

Vasectomies have not been as widely favoured as have techniques of sterilization in Canada for some years, in spite of having a better morbidity and mortality record than tubal sterilizations. Physicians or others who themselves have had the procedure seem to be in an especially favourable position to describe accurately the advantages and risks of this surgery, as well as its alternatives. Questionnaires inquiring about reasons for choosing vasectomy were sent to 42 medical doctors who had undergone the procedure. Counsellors can usefully proffer to inquiring patients the same advantages that reportedly motivated the medical doctors: convenience, economy, and safety.

Keywords: vasectomy, motivations

Full text

PDF
1749

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Burnell G. M., Norfleet M. A. Psychosocial factors influencing American men and women in their decision for sterilization. J Psychol. 1986 Mar;120(2):113–119. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1986.9712620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Foulkes J., Chamberlain G. Effects of sterilization on menstruation. South Med J. 1985 May;78(5):544–547. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198505000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Huggins G. R., Sondheimer S. J. Complications of female sterilization: immediate and delayed. Fertil Steril. 1984 Mar;41(3):337–355. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)47709-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Markman L. M., Frankel H. A. The choice of sterilization procedure among married couples. J Fam Pract. 1982 Jan;14(1):27–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mumford S. D. The vasectomy decision-making process. Stud Fam Plann. 1983 Mar;14(3):83–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Newton J. R., Gillman S. A retrospective survey of female sterilisation for the years 1968 to 1973. Analysis of morbidity and post-sterilisation complications for 5 years. Contraception. 1980 Sep;22(3):295–312. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(80)80008-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Peterson H. B., DeStefano F., Rubin G. L., Greenspan J. R., Lee N. C., Ory H. W. Deaths attributable to tubal sterilization in the United States, 1977 to 1981. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983 May 15;146(2):131–136. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(83)91040-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Smith G. L., Taylor G. P., Smith K. F. Comparative risks and costs of male and female sterilization. Am J Public Health. 1985 Apr;75(4):370–374. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.4.370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Vessey M., Huggins G., Lawless M., McPherson K., Yeates D. Tubal sterilization: findings in a large prospective study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983 Mar;90(3):203–209. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1983.tb08609.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Family Physician are provided here courtesy of College of Family Physicians of Canada

RESOURCES