Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1996 Jan 1;107(1):35–45. doi: 10.1085/jgp.107.1.35

Gating of Na channels in the rat cortical collecting tubule: effects of voltage and membrane stretch

PMCID: PMC2219247  PMID: 8741729

Abstract

The gating kinetics of apical membrane Na channels in the rat cortical collecting tubule were assessed in cell-attached and inside-out excised patches from split-open tubules using the patch-clamp technique. In patches containing a single channel the open probability (Po) was variable, ranging from 0.05 to 0.9. The average Po was 0.5. However, the individual values were not distributed normally, but were mainly < or = 0.25 or > or = 0.75. Mean open times and mean closed times were correlated directly and inversely, respectively, with Po. In patches where a sufficient number of events could be recorded, two time constants were required to describe the open-time and closed-time distributions. In most patches in which basal Po was < 0.3 the channels could be activated by hyperpolarization of the apical membrane. In five such patches containing a single channel hyperpolarization by 40 mV increased Po by 10-fold, from 0.055 +/- 0.023 to 0.58 +/- 0.07. This change reflected an increase in the mean open time of the channels from 52 +/- 17 to 494 +/- 175 ms and a decrease in the mean closed time from 1,940 +/- 350 to 336 +/- 100 ms. These responses, however, could not be described by a simple voltage dependence of the opening and closing rates. In many cases significant delays in both the activation by hyperpolarization and deactivation by depolarization were observed. These delays ranged from several seconds to several tens of seconds. Similar effects of voltage were seen in cell-attached and excised patches, arguing against a voltage-dependent chemical modification of the channel, such as a phosphorylation. Rather, the channels appeared to switch between gating modes. These switches could be spontaneous but were strongly influenced by changes in membrane voltage. Voltage dependence of channel gating was also observed under whole-cell clamp conditions. To see if mechanical perturbations could also influence channel kinetics or gating mode, negative pressures of 10-60 mm Hg were applied to the patch pipette. In most cases (15 out of 22), this maneuver had no significant effect on channel behavior. In 6 out of 22 patches, however, there was a rapid and reversible increase in Po when the pressure was applied. In one patch, there was a reversible decrease. While no consistent effects of pressure could be documented, membrane deformation could contribute to the variation in Po under some conditions.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (896.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Canessa C. M., Horisberger J. D., Rossier B. C. Epithelial sodium channel related to proteins involved in neurodegeneration. Nature. 1993 Feb 4;361(6411):467–470. doi: 10.1038/361467a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Canessa C. M., Schild L., Buell G., Thorens B., Gautschi I., Horisberger J. D., Rossier B. C. Amiloride-sensitive epithelial Na+ channel is made of three homologous subunits. Nature. 1994 Feb 3;367(6462):463–467. doi: 10.1038/367463a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chalfie M., Driscoll M., Huang M. Degenerin similarities. Nature. 1993 Feb 11;361(6412):504–504. doi: 10.1038/361504a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Driscoll M., Chalfie M. The mec-4 gene is a member of a family of Caenorhabditis elegans genes that can mutate to induce neuronal degeneration. Nature. 1991 Feb 14;349(6310):588–593. doi: 10.1038/349588a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Frindt G., Sackin H., Palmer L. G. Whole-cell currents in rat cortical collecting tubule: low-Na diet increases amiloride-sensitive conductance. Am J Physiol. 1990 Mar;258(3 Pt 2):F562–F567. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.1990.258.3.F562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Frindt G., Silver R. B., Windhager E. E., Palmer L. G. Feedback regulation of Na channels in rat CCT. II. Effects of inhibition of Na entry. Am J Physiol. 1993 Mar;264(3 Pt 2):F565–F574. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.1993.264.3.F565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Garty H., Benos D. J. Characteristics and regulatory mechanisms of the amiloride-blockable Na+ channel. Physiol Rev. 1988 Apr;68(2):309–373. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1988.68.2.309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hess P., Lansman J. B., Tsien R. W. Different modes of Ca channel gating behaviour favoured by dihydropyridine Ca agonists and antagonists. Nature. 1984 Oct 11;311(5986):538–544. doi: 10.1038/311538a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Huang M., Chalfie M. Gene interactions affecting mechanosensory transduction in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 1994 Feb 3;367(6462):467–470. doi: 10.1038/367467a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kemendy A. E., Kleyman T. R., Eaton D. C. Aldosterone alters the open probability of amiloride-blockable sodium channels in A6 epithelia. Am J Physiol. 1992 Oct;263(4 Pt 1):C825–C837. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1992.263.4.C825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ling B. N., Eaton D. C. Effects of luminal Na+ on single Na+ channels in A6 cells, a regulatory role for protein kinase C. Am J Physiol. 1989 Jun;256(6 Pt 2):F1094–F1103. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.1989.256.6.F1094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lingueglia E., Voilley N., Waldmann R., Lazdunski M., Barbry P. Expression cloning of an epithelial amiloride-sensitive Na+ channel. A new channel type with homologies to Caenorhabditis elegans degenerins. FEBS Lett. 1993 Feb 22;318(1):95–99. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(93)81336-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Marunaka Y., Hagiwara N., Tohda H. Insulin activates single amiloride-blockable Na channels in a distal nephron cell line (A6). Am J Physiol. 1992 Sep;263(3 Pt 2):F392–F400. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.1992.263.3.F392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ohara A., Matsunaga H., Eaton D. C. G protein activation inhibits amiloride-blockable highly selective sodium channels in A6 cells. Am J Physiol. 1993 Feb;264(2 Pt 1):C352–C360. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1993.264.2.C352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Palmer L. G. Epithelial Na channels: function and diversity. Annu Rev Physiol. 1992;54:51–66. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.54.030192.000411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Palmer L. G., Frindt G. Amiloride-sensitive Na channels from the apical membrane of the rat cortical collecting tubule. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Apr;83(8):2767–2770. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.8.2767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Palmer L. G., Frindt G. Conductance and gating of epithelial Na channels from rat cortical collecting tubule. Effects of luminal Na and Li. J Gen Physiol. 1988 Jul;92(1):121–138. doi: 10.1085/jgp.92.1.121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Palmer L. G., Frindt G. Effects of cell Ca and pH on Na channels from rat cortical collecting tubule. Am J Physiol. 1987 Aug;253(2 Pt 2):F333–F339. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.1987.253.2.F333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pácha J., Frindt G., Antonian L., Silver R. B., Palmer L. G. Regulation of Na channels of the rat cortical collecting tubule by aldosterone. J Gen Physiol. 1993 Jul;102(1):25–42. doi: 10.1085/jgp.102.1.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pácha J., Frindt G., Sackin H., Palmer L. G. Apical maxi K channels in intercalated cells of CCT. Am J Physiol. 1991 Oct;261(4 Pt 2):F696–F705. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.1991.261.4.F696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sigworth F. J., Sine S. M. Data transformations for improved display and fitting of single-channel dwell time histograms. Biophys J. 1987 Dec;52(6):1047–1054. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(87)83298-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Silver R. B., Frindt G., Windhager E. E., Palmer L. G. Feedback regulation of Na channels in rat CCT. I. Effects of inhibition of Na pump. Am J Physiol. 1993 Mar;264(3 Pt 2):F557–F564. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.1993.264.3.F557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Smith P. R., Benos D. J. Epithelial Na+ channels. Annu Rev Physiol. 1991;53:509–530. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.53.030191.002453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wills N. K., Millinoff L. P., Crowe W. E. Na+ channel activity in cultured renal (A6) epithelium: regulation by solution osmolarity. J Membr Biol. 1991 Apr;121(1):79–90. doi: 10.1007/BF01870653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES