TABLE 1.
Ar. subalbatus | O. atropalpus | An. gambiae | T. amboinensis | O. epactius | O. togoi | Ae. aegypti | Ae. polynesiensis | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
O. atropalpus | 79.8 | |||||||
An. gambiae | 93.6 | 77.9 | ||||||
T. amboinensis | 95.5 | 79.5 | 93.5 | |||||
O. epactius | 80.3 | 97.6 | 78.4 | 79.9 | ||||
O. togoi | 95.8 | 79.7 | 94.3 | 96.2 | 80.1 | |||
Ae. aegypti | 95.2 | 78.9 | 93.2 | 95.3 | 79.0 | 95.4 | ||
Ae. polynesiensis | 93.2 | 78.4 | 91.1 | 93.0 | 78.7 | 93.2 | 93.2 | |
O. triseriatus | 94.6 | 80.6 | 92.1 | 94.2 | 81.1 | 94.6 | 93.9 | 92.0 |
Numbers are percentages. Only coding regions were compared because they were the only sequence available for some copies. Pairwise nt identities were determined by PAUP (Swofford 2002) after alignment with CLUSTAL_X (Thompson et al. 1997). Ae. aegypti, AaegITmD37E_Ele 4.1; Ae. polynesiensis, ApolITmD37E_Ele1; Ar. subalbatus, AsubITmD37E_Ele1.2; O. atropalpus, OatrITmD37E_Ele1.1; O. epactius, OepaITmD37E_Ele1.1; O. togoi, OtogITmD37E_Ele1.1; O. triseriatus, OtriITmD37E_Ele1.1; An. gambiae, AgamITmD37E_Ele1.1; T. amboinensis, TambITmD37E_Ele1. See supplemental File S1 at http://www.genetics.org/supplemental/ for methods. Refer to supplemental File S2 for sequence information.