Skip to main content
Mediators of Inflammation logoLink to Mediators of Inflammation
. 2008 Jan 10;2007:31397. doi: 10.1155/2007/31397

Serum IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α Levels in Early Diagnosis and Management of Neonatal Sepsis

A Nese Citak Kurt 1,*, A Denizmen Aygun 1, Ahmet Godekmerdan 2, Abdullah Kurt 1, Yasar Dogan 1, Erdal Yilmaz 1
PMCID: PMC2220039  PMID: 18274637

Abstract

Aim. To determine serum IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α levels in neonatal sepsis at the time of diagnosis and after therapy, and to show the meaningful on the follow up. Methods. This prospective study was performed on newborns who were hospitalized for neonatal sepsis and who were classified as culture-proven sepsis (n=12), as culture-negative sepsis (n=21), and as healthy newborns (n=17). Results. At the time of diagnosis, serum IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α levels of culture-proven sepsis were significantly higher than those of the control groups (P<.05). At the time of diagnosis, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α levels of culture-proven sepsis and culture-negative sepsis were significantly higher than levels at the seventh day after antibiotic treatment. Conclusion. Serum IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α are mediators of inflammation and can be used at the diagnosis and at the evaluation of the therapeutic efficiency in neonatal sepsis.

1. INTRODUCTION

Bacterial infection in newborns, especially preterm, may rapidly evolve into generalized sepsis. This condition has a gradual and subtle onset, with nonspecific symptoms that may severely compromise the infant’s clinical state if untreated and lead to life-threatening consequences. Neonatal sepsis has a fairly low incidence at birth (1–10/1000 live births) but may affect up to 16% of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) with birth weight of 501–1500 gm. The mortality rate is very high: 15–50% of affected infants [1].

Clinical manifestations are nonspecific and laboratory parameters such as white blood cell (WBC) count or C-reactive protein (CRP) are of limited value in identifying infected newborns. As a consequence, appropriate diagnosis and therapy could be delayed, worsening the prognosis of the patient [26].

In studies elsewhere [4,7,8], the WBC count showed a low detection sensitivity in neonatal infection. Even the combination of total neutrophil count, immature-to-total neutrophil ratio (I/T), and platelet count failed to reach an appropriate sensitivity and specifity in this pathology. C-reactive protein has been thoroughly studied as a diagnostic tool in neonatal sepsis and also as an indicator of response to therapy [9, 10].

The underdeveloped immune system predisposes preterm newborns to infection, which is a major cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Sepsis and endotoxin activate monocytes, macrophages, lymphocytes, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells that produce and secrete IL-1, TNF-α, α-interferon, IL-6, IL-8, and other proinflammatory cytokines. IL-6, stimulated by TNF-α, IL-1, and endotoxin of viral and bacterial infections, acts as a T-cell activation indicator, induces antibody secretion by human B-cells, causes differentiation of cytotoxic T-cells, and also has the ability to inhibit TNF-α production. Moreover, IL-6 is the major stimulant in hepatic protein synthesis, that is, CRP and fibrinogen during acute phase responses. Previous studies have shown that determinations of IL-6 in neonatal blood are of diagnostic value in sepsis. Elevated serum IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α levels have been found in both the neonatal and adult sepsis. Several studies have evaluated the role of cytokine determinations as early diagnostic markers in neonatal sepsis [1117].

The aim of this study is to determine serum IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α levels in neonatal sepsis at the time of diagnosis and after therapy and to show the meaningful on the follow up.

2. MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective study was performed on newborns who were hospitalized for neonatal sepsis at NICU. Inclusion criteria were positive clinical signs of sepsis and/or history of factors associated with increased risk for infection and parental informed consent. Exclusion criteria were congenital malformations, congenital infections associated with the TORCH complex, and refusal of parental consent. Clinical signs of sepsis were defined as the presence of three or more of the following categories of clinical signs: apnea, tachypnea (>60/min), nasalflaring, retraction, cyanosis, respiratory distress-bradycardia (<100/min), tachycardia (>180/min), hypotonia, seizures-poor skin colour, capillary refilling time longer than two seconds, irritability, and lethargy. Historical factors associated with increased risk for infection included premature rupture of the membranes (in term infants >18 hours), maternal fever during labour, intraamniotic infection, and chorioamnionitis. Two or more abnormal values of the sepsis screen (as white blood cell count <4000 or >10.000 mm3, immature-to-total neutrophil ratio higher than 0.2 and CRP positivity) were considered as supportive for diagnosis of infection [18]. Newborns were classified as culture-proven sepsis (positive blood culture), as culture-negative sepsis (negative blood culture, but clinical signs of sepsis with positive sepsis screen and/or a history of risk factors, and antibiotic treatment longer than 7 days), and as control groups (healthy, noninfectious newborns). Blood samples were obtained at time of diagnosis and seventh day after antibiotic treatment, their serum extracted and IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α were determined.

Blood analysis was done in Firat Medical Center Immunology Laboratory (Elazig, Turkey). The local ethics commission approved the study.

CRP was determined by the Behring Nephelometer 100 Analyzer BN II (NY, USA). Detection limit was 3 mg/L and a serum value of >8 mg/L was defined as abnormally elevated. The serum samples of the study and control groups were studied by ELISA for IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α levels with human cytokine kits (Biosource, Calif, USA). Detection limit for serum IL-1β level was 1 pg/mL, measure range was 0–250 pg/mL. Detection limit for serum IL-6 level was 2 pg/mL, measure range was 0–500 pg/mL. Detection limit for serum IL-8 level was 5 pg/mL, measure range was 0–1000 pg/mL. Detection limit for serum TNF-α level was 1.7 pg/mL, measure range was 0–1000 pg/mL The collected blood samples were centrifuged at 2500 g for 10 minutes at 4°C. The serum layer was separated and frozen at 80°C for cytokine analysis, which was performed in less than 2 weeks. Freezing/thawing cycles were avoided.

Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS 11.0 programs for Windowns XP. The results were done as mean ± standard deviation. Kruskal Wallis and post hoc test Scheffe procedures were used; the difference in three groups and P<.05 was considered to be significant. Wilcoxon test was used for the interpretation of the difference between at time of diagnosis and after therapy.

3. RESULTS

In total, 50 newborns were included in the study: 12 culture-proven sepsis, 21 culture-negative sepsis, and 17 control. Table 1 shows the characteristics of the study group.

Table 1.

Characteristics of the study groups.

Character Culture-proven sepsis (n=12) Culture-negative sepsis (n=21) Controls (n=17)
Gender M/F 8/4 9/13 8/9
Weight(g) 2033±938 2111±975 2294±761
Gestational age (weeks) 34.2±4.0 34.0±3.3 35.3±2.6

At time of diagnosis, serum IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α levels of culture-proven sepsis were significantly higher than those of the control groups (P<.05); but only serum IL-8 levels of culture-proven sepsis was significantly higher than culture-negative sepsis (P<.05).

At time of diagnosis, serum IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α levels of culture-proven sepsis and culture-negative sepsis were significantly higher than levels at seventh day after antibiotic treatment (P<.05).

Serum IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α levels were showed in Table 2.

Table 2.

Serum IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α levels of the study groups.

Serum cytokine levels Culture-proven sepsisa (n=12) Culture-negative sepsisb (n=21) Controlsc (n=17) *P value <.05
IL-1β (pg/mL) At time of diagnosis1 41.20±13.57 33.30±8.62 10.35±2.65 a-c, b-c
7th day2 10.87±4.49 9.47±3.53
IL-6 (pg/mL) At time of diagnosis1 193.95±74.11 155.42±70.06 8.19±5.84 a-c, b-c
7th day2 9.45±6.96 8.99±6.08
IL-8 (pg/mL) At time of diagnosis1 481.33±186.58 376.85±96.61 55.51±26.54 a-b, a-c, b-c
7th day2 89.41±57.69 53.57±34.84
TNF-α (pg/mL) At time of diagnosis1 21.00±9.43 17.64±6.70 4.55±1.52 a-c, b-c
7th day2 5.23±1.74 4.92±1.68
**P value
P<.05 1-2 1-2

* Kruskal Wallis test.

** Wilcoxon test.

4. DISCUSSION

Bacterial infection continues to be the major cause of morbidity and mortality in the newborn. Because the prognosis for sepsis largely depends on early identification and treatment, these newborns are subjected to extensive diagnostic evaluation and empirical systemic antibiotic treatment, pending laboratory results. The definitive diagnosis of sepsis is made by a positive blood culture, which requires a minimum of 48–72 hours, yields a positive result in only 30–70% of cases, and may not always be available in peripheral health centers. Several studies have examined the laboratory findings associated with sepsis [1921]. There is, however, a lack of consensus on the essential tests that would identify newborns with acute infection. Fowlie et al. [22] conducted a systematic review to determine the value of diagnostic tests for bacterial infection in early life (from birth to 90 days old) and reported that the accuracy of tests varies enormously and the tests are of limited value in the diagnosis of infection.

Hematological parameters have been evaluated in previous studies. Da Silva et al. [23] found significant heterogeneity across these studies. The possible sources of heterogeneity were population, age, whether the subjects were at term or preterm, methodological quality, different leukocyte indices, different cutoff values, and interpretation of test results by different laboratory observers.

In the past few decades, it has been observed that several mediators of inflammation tend to become elevated during sepsis. The concentrations of some proinflammatory cytokines, especially TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-8, in systemic circulation were reported to increase in severe infections and septic shock [24]. Martin et al. [17] showed that serum IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α levels were all higher in septic than in nonseptic newborns.

The study of IL-1β and TNF-α, cytokines that are synthesized at the beginning of the inflammatory cascade has rendered differing results. In our study, the serum TNF-α and IL-1β levels were significantly increased in newborns with sepsis. Results of different published studies relation to these cytokines are contradictory. Concerning IL-1β results, similar to ours, they have been reported by some researchers while not by others [2528]. Publishing data regarding TNF-α is also divergent. Some studies found the diagnostic utility of this cytokine [25, 26] while others demonstrated similar or even lower levels in infected newborns compared to healthy newborns [29, 30]. Discrepancies in results among different studies could be explained by the variations in laboratory methods in performing the analysis, the time of the sample collection, or the control population selected [28].

Interleukin-6 has been reported as an early indicator of neonatal sepsis because of its rapid increase after endotoxin challenge. IL-6 is secreted by monocytes and macrophages in response to bacteremia [31]. Previous studies have shown IL-6 to be a useful marker of early infection in the newborn [3134]. Kantar et al. [31] showed that septic preterm newborns had significantly elevated IL-6 levels at the onset of sepsis as compared to the recovery period and the controls. In our study, it was observed that IL-6 levels of newborn with culture-proven sepsis and culture-negative sepsis were significantly higher than controls (P<.05).

Interleukin-8 is a cytokine that has a role in the release, activation, and chemotaxis of neutrophils. Serum IL-8 level has been reported to increase in neonatal sepsis and have a sensitivity of about 80–90% and a specifity of about 76–100% [35, 36]. In this study, it was detected that IL-8 levels of newborns with culture-proven sepsis were significantly higher than culture-negative sepsis and controls (P<.05). Kocabas et al. [37] and Martin et al. [17] found that IL-8 were higher in septic than in nonseptic newborns.

Another characteristic of the markers that are used in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis is that it gives information about the prognosis of the disease and helps in coming to a decision as to whether to stop or continue antibiotic treatment. In this study, it is found that IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α levels were statistically decreased in newborns after seven-day therapy than in newborns at the time of diagnosis (P<.05). Similar results have been obtained in many studies [3739].

5. CONCLUSION

Serum levels of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α are mediators of inflammation and can be used at the diagnosis and at the evaluation of the therapeutic efficiency in neonatal sepsis.

References

  • 1.Volante E, Moretti S, Pisani F, Bevilacqua G. Early diagnosis of bacterial infection in the neonate. Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2004;16(2):13–16. doi: 10.1080/14767050410001727116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gladstone IM, Ehrenkranz RA, Edberg SC, Baltimore RS. A ten-year review of neonatal sepsis and comparison with the previous fifty-year experience. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. 1990;9(11):819–825. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199011000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vesikari R, Janas M, Grönroos P, et al. Neonatal septicaemia. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 1985;60(6):542–546. doi: 10.1136/adc.60.6.542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kite P, Millar MR, Gorham P, Congdon P. Comparison of five tests used in diagnosis of neonatal bacteraemia. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 1988;63(6):639–643. doi: 10.1136/adc.63.6.639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ainbender E, Cabatu EE, Guzman DM, Sweet AY. Serum C-reactive protein and problems of newborn infants. Journal of Pediatrics. 1982;101(3):438–440. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(82)80080-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Da Silva O, Ohlsson A, Kenyon C. Accuracy of leukocyte indices and C-reactive protein for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: a critical review. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. 1995;14(5):1119–1120. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199505000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Manroe BL, Weinberg AG, Rosenfeld CR, Browne R. The neonatal blood count in health and disease. I. Reference values for neutrophilic cells. Journal of Pediatrics. 1979;95(1):89–98. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(79)80096-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zipursky A, Palko J, Milner R, Akenzua GI. The hematology of bacterial infections in premature infants. Pediatrics. 1976;57(6):839–853. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mathers NJ, Pohlandt F. Diagnostic audit of C-reactive protein in neonatal infection. European Journal of Pediatrics. 1987;146(2):147–151. doi: 10.1007/BF02343221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sann L, Bienvenu F, Bienvenu J. Evolution of serum prealbumin, C-reactive protein, and orosomucoid in neonates with bacterial infection. Journal of Pediatrics. 1984;105(6):977–981. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(84)80094-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Berner R, Niemeyer CM, Leititis JU, et al. Plasma levels and gene expression of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in neonatal early onset sepsis. Pediatric Research. 1998;44(4):469–477. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199810000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cairo MS. Neonatal neutrophil host defense. Prospects for immunologic enhancement during neonatal sepsis. American Journal of Diseases of Children. 1989;143(1):40–46. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1989.02150130050014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Buck C, Bundschu J, Gallati H, Bartmann P, Pohlandt F. Interleukin-6: a sensitive parameter for the early diagnosis of neonatal bacterial infection. Pediatrics. 1994;93(1):54–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.de Bont ES, Martens A, van Raan J, et al. Diagnostic value of plasma levels of tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in newborns with sepsis. Acta Paediatrica. 1994;83(7):696–699. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1994.tb13121.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Harris MC, Costarino AT, Jr., Sullivan JS, et al. Cytokine elevations in critically ill infants with sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis. Journal of Pediatrics. 1994;124(1):105–111. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(94)70264-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Matthes T, Werner-Favre C, Tang H, Zhang X, Kindler V, Zubler RH. Cytokine mRNA expression during an in vitro response of human B lymphocytes: kinetics of B cell tumor necrosis factor α, interleukin (IL)6, IL-10, and transforming growth factor β1 mRNAs. Journal of Experimental Medicine. 1993;178(2):521–528. doi: 10.1084/jem.178.2.521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Martin H, Olander B, Norman M. Reactive hyperemia and interleukin 6, interleukin 8, and tumor necrosis factor-α in the diagnosis of early-onset neonatal sepsis. Pediatrics. 2001;108(4):1–6. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.4.e61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Philip AG, Hewitt JR. Early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. Pediatrics. 1980;65(5):1036–1041. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Akenzua GI, Hui YT, Milner R, Zipursky A. Neutrophil and band counts in the diagnosis of neonatal infections. Pediatrics. 1974;54(1):38–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Xanthou M. Leukocyte blood picture in ill newborn babies. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 1972;47(255):741–743. doi: 10.1136/adc.47.255.741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Manucha V, Rusia U, Sikka M, Faridi MMA, Madan N. Utility of haematological parameters and C-reactive protein in the detection of neonatal sepsis. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health. 2002;38(5):459–464. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1754.2002.00018.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fowlie PW, Schmidt B. Diagnostic tests for bacterial infection from birth to 90 days—a systematic review. Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition. 1998;78(2):F92–F98. doi: 10.1136/fn.78.2.f92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Da Silva O, Ohlsson A, Kenyon C. Accuracy of leukocyte indices and C-reactive protein for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: a critical review. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. 1995;14(5):362–366. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199505000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Saez-Llorens X, Lagrutta SF. The acute phase host reaction during bacterial infection and its clinical impact in children. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. 1993;12(1):83–87. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199301000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.de Bont ES, Martens A, van Raan J, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-1β, and interleukin-6 plasma levels in neonatal sepsis. Pediatric Research. 1993;33(4, part 1):380–383. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199304000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ozdemir A, Oygur N, Gultekin M, Coskun M, Yegin O. Neonatal tumor necrosis factor, interleukin-1α, interleukin-1β, and interleukin-6 response to infection. American Journal of Perinatology. 1994;11(4):282–285. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-994592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ng PC, Cheng SH, Chui KM, et al. Diagnosis of late onset neonatal sepsis with cytokines, adhesion molecule, and C-reactive protein in preterm very low birthweight infants. Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition. 1997;77(3):F221–F227. doi: 10.1136/fn.77.3.f221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Santana Reyes C, García-Muñoz F, Reyes D, González G, Dominguez C, Domenech E. Role of cytokines (interleukin-1β, 6, 8, tumour necrosis factor-α, and soluble receptor of interleukin-2) and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. Acta Paediatrica. 2003;92(2):221–227. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2003.tb00530.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Miller LC, Isa S, LoPreste G, Schaller JG, Dinarello CA. Neonatal interleukin-1β-, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor: cord blood levels and cellular production. Journal of Pediatrics. 1990;117(6):961–965. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)80145-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Edgar JDM, Wilson DC, McMillan SA, et al. Predictive value of soluble immunological mediators in neonatal infection. Clinical Science. 1994;87(2):165–171. doi: 10.1042/cs0870165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kantar M, Kültürsay N, Kütükçüler N, Akisü M, Çetingül N, Çaglayan S. Plasma concentrations of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and interleukin-6 in septic and healthy preterms. European Journal of Pediatrics. 2000;159(3):156–157. doi: 10.1007/s004310050041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Magudumana O, Ballot DE, Cooper PA, et al. Serial interleukin 6 measurements in the early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics. 2000;46(5):267–271. doi: 10.1093/tropej/46.5.267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lehrnbecher T, Schrod L, Kraus D, Roos T, Martius J, von Stockhausen H-B. Interleukin-6 and soluble interleukin-6 receptor in cord blood in the diagnosis of early onset sepsis in neonates. Acta Paediatrica. 1995;84(7):806–808. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1995.tb13761.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Harris MC, Costarino AT, Jr., Sullivan JS, et al. Cytokine elevations in critically ill infants with sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis. Journal of Pediatrics. 1994;124(1):105–111. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(94)70264-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Franz AR, Steinbach G, Kron M, Pohlandt F. Reduction of unnecessary antibiotic therapy in newborn infants using interleukin-8 and C-reactive protein as markers of bacterial infections. Pediatrics. 1999;104(3):447–453. doi: 10.1542/peds.104.3.447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Franz AR, Steinbach G, Kron M, Pohlandt F. Interleukin-8: a valuable tool to restrict antibiotic therapy in newborn infants. Acta Paediatrica. 2001;90(9):1025–1032. doi: 10.1080/080352501316978110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kocabaş E, Sarikçioǧlu A, Aksaray N, Seydaoǧlu G, Seyhun Y, Yaman A. Role of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, interleukin-8 and tumor necrosis factor-α in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. Turkish Journal of Pediatrics. 2007;49(1):7–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Messer J, Eyer D, Donato L, Gallati H, Martis J, Simeoni U. Evaluation of interleukin-6 and soluble receptors of tumor necrosis factor for early diagnosis of neonatal infection. Journal of Pediatrics. 1996;129(4):574–580. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(96)70123-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Oberhoffer M, Vogelsang H, Rußwurm S, Hartung T, Reinhart K. Outcome prediction by traditional and new markers of inflammation in patients with sepsis. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 1999;37(3):363–368. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.1999.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mediators of Inflammation are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES