Abstract
A retrospective histopathological review of 2104 cases of solid tumour was carried out to assess the variability in diagnosis of childhood cancer. Cases were subject to three independent, concurrent opinions from a national panel of specialist pathologists. The conformity between them was analysed using the percentage of agreement and the kappa statistic (kappa), a measure of the level of agreement beyond that which could occur by chance alone, and weighted kappa (w kappa), which demonstrates the degree of variation between opinions. The major groupings of the Birch-Marsden classification were used within which tumours were assigned for kappa analysis according to the clinical significance of the differential diagnoses. The mean agreement for all tumours together was 90%; kappa = 0.82, w kappa = 0.82. Retinoblastoma achieved the highest kappa value (1.0) and lymphoma the lowest (0.66). Of the cases, 16.5% had their original diagnoses amended and the panel confirmed the original diagnosis of paediatric pathologists in 89% of cases compared with 78% for general pathologists. The varying levels of agreement between experts confirm the difficulty of diagnosis in some tumour types, suggesting justification for specialist review in most diagnoses. Specialist training in paediatric pathology is also recommended.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Birch J. M., Marsden H. B. A classification scheme for childhood cancer. Int J Cancer. 1987 Nov 15;40(5):620–624. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910400508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bland J. M., Altman D. G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Freedman L. S., Machin D. Pathology review in cancer research. Br J Cancer. 1993 Nov;68(5):827–830. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1993.440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maclure M., Willett W. C. Misinterpretation and misuse of the kappa statistic. Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Aug;126(2):161–169. doi: 10.1093/aje/126.2.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maxwell A. E. Coefficients of agreement between observers and their interpretation. Br J Psychiatry. 1977 Jan;130:79–83. doi: 10.1192/bjp.130.1.79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muir K. R., Parkes S. E., Mann J. R., Stevens M. C., Cameron A. H. Childhood cancer in the West Midlands: incidence and survival, 1980-1984, in a multi-ethnic population. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 1992 May;4(3):177–182. doi: 10.1016/s0936-6555(05)81083-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Presant C. A., Russell W. O., Alexander R. W., Fu Y. S. Soft-tissue and bone sarcoma histopathology peer review: the frequency of disagreement in diagnosis and the need for second pathology opinions. The Southeastern Cancer Study Group experience. J Clin Oncol. 1986 Nov;4(11):1658–1661. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1986.4.11.1658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Segelov E., Cox K. M., Raghavan D., McNeil E., Lancaster L., Rogers J. The impact of histological review on clinical management of testicular cancer. Br J Urol. 1993 Jun;71(6):736–738. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1993.tb16076.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]