Skip to main content
The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology logoLink to The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology
. 1955 Jul 25;1(4):301–314. doi: 10.1083/jcb.1.4.301

INTERPRETATIONS OF ELECTRON MICROGRAPHS OF SINGLE AND SERIAL SECTIONS

Robley C Williams 1, Frances Kallman 1
PMCID: PMC2223825  PMID: 13242595

Abstract

A method of securing serial sections for electron microscopy is described. Serial sections present certain anomalies of interpretation of a nature such that a complete and detailed three-dimensional reconstruction of the sectioned tissue cannot be made. These anomalies are discussed, as well as those which have been encountered in the interpretation of single sections. Observations of the following kinds have been made in an attempt to elucidate the interpretation of single and serial sections: differing methods of mounting adjacent sections, observation of the same section by high-angle stereoscopy, and examination of sections which have been shadowed prior to and subsequent to electron microscopy. It is found that the appearance of sections is independent of the choice of side to be placed against the formvar films. Stereoscopy shows that the appearance of fine structures is strongly dependent upon the direction of the penetrating electron beam with respect to the plane of the structures. Stereoscopy, combined with shadowing, shows quantitatively that extensive sublimation of polymer occurs upon normal exposure in the electron microscope. Observation of sections shadowed prior to electron microscopy indicates that varying amounts of material are removed between sections by the action of microtomy; i.e., it is probable that the sum of the thicknesses of several serial sections is considerably less than the total thickness of material removed from the block. It is believed that this effect, combined with the effect of sublimation, aids in explaining the failure of adjacent sections to exhibit continuity in their detailed structures.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. FLEWETT T. H., EAVES G. High resolution electron micrographs of thin tissue sections. Nature. 1954 Feb 13;173(4398):309–309. doi: 10.1038/173309a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. GAY H., ANDERSON T. F. Serial sections for electron microscopy. Science. 1954 Dec 24;120(3130):1071–1073. doi: 10.1126/science.120.3130.1071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. MORGAN C., ELLISON S. A., ROSE H. M., MOORE D. H. Structure and development of viruses observed in the electron microscope. II. Vaccinia and fowl pox viruses. J Exp Med. 1954 Sep 1;100(3):301–310. doi: 10.1084/jem.100.3.301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. WATSON M. L. A method for complete extraction of embedding material from tissue sections for the electron microscope. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1953 Mar;10(3):349–354. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(53)90264-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES