Abstract
Fragments of freshly obtained retinas of several vertebrate species were studied by refractometry, with reference to the structure of the rods and cones. The findings allowed a reassessment of previous descriptions based mainly on fixed material. The refractometric method was used also to measure the refractice indices and to calculate the concentrations of solids and water in the various cell segments. The main quantitative data were confirmed by interference microscopy. When examined by the method of refractometry the outer segments of freshly prepared retinal rods appear homogeneous. Within a few minutes a single eccentric longitudinal fiber appears, and transverse striations may develop. These changes are attributed to imbibition of water and swelling in structures normally too small for detection by light microscopy. The central "core" of outer segments and the chromophobic disc between outer and inner segments appear to be artifacts resulting from shrinkage during dehydration. The fresh outer segments of cones, and the inner segments of rods and cones also are described and illustrated. The volumes, refractive indices, concentrations of solids, and wet and dry weights of various segments of the photoreceptor cells were tabulated. Rod outer segments of the different species vary more than 100-fold in volume and mass but all have concentrations of solids of 40 to 43 per cent. Cone outer segments contain only about 30 per cent solids. The myoids, paraboloids, and ellipsoids of the inner segments likewise have characteristic refractive indices and concentrations of solids. Some of the limitations and particular virtues of refractometry as a method for quantitative analysis of living cells are discussed in comparison with more conventional biochemical techniques. Also the shapes and refractive indices of the various segments of photoreceptor cells are considered in relation to the absorption and transmission of light. The Stiles-Crawford effect can be accounted for on the basis of the structure of cone cells.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- ARDEN G. B. Light-sensitive pigment in the visual cells of the frog. J Physiol. 1954 Feb 26;123(2):377–385. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BARER R., ROSS K. F. A., TKACZYK S. Refractometry of living cells. Nature. 1953 Apr 25;171(4356):720–724. doi: 10.1038/171720a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BARER R., SIDMAN R. L. The absorption spectrum of rhodopsin in solution and in intact rods. J Physiol. 1955 Sep 28;129(3):60–1P. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BARER R. Spectrophotometry of clarified cell suspensions. Science. 1955 May 20;121(3151):709–715. doi: 10.1126/science.121.3151.709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- COLLINS F. D., LOVE R. M., MORTON R. A. Studies in rhodopsin. V. Chemical analysis of retinal material. Biochem J. 1952 Aug;51(5):669–673. doi: 10.1042/bj0510669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DE ROBERTIS E. Electron microscope observations on the submicroscopic organization of the retinal rods. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1956 May 25;2(3):319–330. doi: 10.1083/jcb.2.3.319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DENTON E. J., WYLLIE J. H. Study of the photosensitive pigments in the pink and green rods of the frog. J Physiol. 1955 Jan 28;127(1):81–89. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O'BRIEN B. Vision and resolution in the central retina. J Opt Soc Am. 1951 Dec;41(12):882–894. doi: 10.1364/josa.41.000882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SIDMAN R. L., WISLOCKI G. B. Histochemical observations on rods and cones in retinas of vertebrates. J Histochem Cytochem. 1954 Nov;2(6):413–433. doi: 10.1177/2.6.413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WISLOCKI G. B., SIDMAN R. L. The chemical morphology of the retina. J Comp Neurol. 1954 Aug;101(1):53–99. doi: 10.1002/cne.901010104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]