Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2007 Nov 21;46(1):290–295. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01818-07

Elucidating Global Epidemiology of Burkholderia multivorans in Cases of Cystic Fibrosis by Multilocus Sequence Typing

Adam Baldwin 1,*, Eshwar Mahenthiralingam 2, Pavel Drevinek 2, Chris Pope 3, David J Waine 1, Deborah A Henry 4, David P Speert 4, Phil Carter 3, Peter Vandamme 5, John J LiPuma 6, Chris G Dowson 1
PMCID: PMC2224285  PMID: 18032622

Abstract

Burkholderia multivorans is a prominent B. cepacia complex (BCC) species causing infection in people with cystic fibrosis. Despite infection control measures being introduced to reduce the spread of BCC there is a continued emergence of infections by B. multivorans. Our objective was to analyze a global collection of B. multivorans isolates, comparing those from environmental and clinical sources with those from reported outbreaks. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was performed on 107 B. multivorans isolates to provide a detailed analysis of the global population biology of this species. MLST resolved 64 B. multivorans sequence types. Twelve of these were globally distributed and associated with human infection; two of these (ST-21 and ST-375) were also composed of environmental isolates. These global lineages included strains previously linked to large outbreaks (e.g., French epidemic clone ST-16). Though few environmental isolates of B. multivorans were available for analysis, of six strains identified, three were identical to strains recovered from cystic fibrosis (CF) infection. Although the ability of B. multivorans to cause CF outbreaks is known, our report here concerning the existence of globally distributed B. multivorans CF strains is a new observation for this emerging B. cepacia complex pathogen and suggests that certain strain types may be better adapted to human infection than others. Common transmission-associated risk factors were not obviously linked to the globally distributed strains; however, the overlap in strains recovered from water environments, industrial products, and human infection suggests that environmental sources may be an important reservoir for infection with B. multivorans.


Burkholderia multivorans is one of at least nine closely related gram-negative species that comprise the B. cepacia complex (BCC) (35). Originally these species were considered to be onion pathogens and were subsequently found to possess many beneficial properties for agricultural use (25). However, after more than two decades they have come to be widely known to cause problematic pulmonary infections in vulnerable individuals, particularly in people with cystic fibrosis (CF) (9).

B. multivorans and Burkholderia cenocepacia are the two predominant BCC species causing human infections, though bacteria from all currently defined BCC species have been cultured from CF sputum (19, 26, 28). However, most research has concentrated on B. cenocepacia, which is widely considered to be the most virulent BCC species, with much less information available on B. multivorans. Comparison of recent epidemiological surveys (4, 12, 28) with older studies (19, 26, 32) suggests that the proportion of BCC-infected CF patients infected with B. multivorans is rising relative to the proportions of infection with B. cenocepacia and the remaining BCC species, with prevalence in the United States ranging from 38% (28) to 51% (4) of BCC infections. This proportional rise is due to a decline in the total incidence of B. cenocepacia while B. multivorans acquisition has remained steady (D. Henry, D. Speert, and J. LiPuma, unpublished data). It is unclear why the incidence of B. cenocepacia has declined and that of B. multivorans has persisted, but it seems most likely that infection control measures are effective at limiting the interpatient spread of “epidemic” B. cenocepacia strains (12, 28). Furthermore, regional differences in B. multivorans recovery rates in cases of CF result in conflicting reports on the emergence and epidemiology of B. multivorans in this population (15, 26, 27, 34, 38).

The introduction of stringent infection control measures has been shown to reduce the incidence of patient-to-patient spread of B. cenocepacia (5, 26) and presumably has reduced interpatient spread of other BCC species. However, the continued emergence of B. multivorans strains (4, 28) suggests acquisition from other sources, such as the natural environment. Recent studies have found evidence that supports the potential for acquisition by humans of BCC, including B. multivorans, directly from natural environments (1, 14, 18).

The purpose of this study was to characterize the B. multivorans population from clinical and environmental sources in order to evaluate strain distribution and propose mechanisms explaining its continued emergence in CF infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strains and culture.

The 107 B. multivorans isolates examined in this study were drawn from the following collections: Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom (1-3, 22); the European B. cepacia Complex Referral Laboratory, Gent, Belgium (7, 36); the U.S. B. cepacia Research Laboratory and Repository, Ann Arbor, Michigan (19); and representatives of a published strain panel (8, 24). These collections contained isolates evaluated in previous molecular epidemiological studies (4, 8, 19, 24). All isolates from clinical sources were obtained with the consent of patients. Bacteria were cultured and identified using polyphasic taxonomic approaches as described previously (22). Isolates were all independently gathered and genetically typed by random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis (23), recA analysis (22, 36), repetitive extragenic palindromic PCR using a BOX A1R primer (4), or pulsed field gel electrophoresis (22) prior to inclusion in the study. All Laboratorium voor Microbiologie, Universiteit Gent (LMG), strains are available from the Belgium Coordinated Collections of Microorganisms (http://bccm.belspo.be/).

Multilocus sequence typing.

To assess the genetic diversity of this species we examined isolates evaluated in previous molecular epidemiological studies (4, 8, 19, 24) that were (i) temporally diverse (distributed over a more than 40-year period from 1966 to 2006), (ii) geographically diverse (isolated in 12 countries on three continents), and (iii) from samples obtained from a range of natural, industrial, and clinical (isolates from CF and non-CF patients) environments. We carried out MLST analysis as previously described for the BCC by use of a single scheme for all BCC species (2). Each distinct (allele) sequence at each of seven genes was assigned a unique arbitrary number (allele type). For each allelic profile (considered to be isogenic when they were indistinguishable at all seven loci) a unique arbitrary sequence type (ST) number was assigned. All sequences were deposited in the Burkholderia cepacia complex MLST Databases at http://pubmlst.org/bcc/. Novel sequence information for all seven loci was obtained for 107 B. multivorans isolates.

Analysis of MLST data.

To construct gene trees of the concatenated sequences (2,773 bp) for the 64 B. multivorans STs, the neighbor-joining Jukes-Cantor method was used (MEGA v3; http://www.megasoftware.net). The significance of branching within the trees was evaluated by bootstrap analysis of 1,000 computer-generated trees. The STs within a clonal complex (CC) group were defined as having at least five MLST loci in common.

RESULTS

Assignment of allele and sequence types.

For thorough evaluation of the B. multivorans species it was important to use a collection of strains identified as being diverse on the basis of analyses of recA sequences, recA-RFLP, repetitive extragenic palindromic-PCR using a BOX A1R primer, random amplified polymorphic DNA, and pulsed field gel electrophoresis profiles, primarily to obtain different STs. For each locus all alleles were found to be of identical lengths (2) for all B. multivorans isolates examined. Nucleotide sequence diversity was found at all seven loci as shown in Table 1. The numbers resolved from this BCC MLST scheme at each locus for B. multivorans ranged from 13 (phaC) to 43 (gyrB) alleles (mean = 28.0; Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Allelic variation at each locus among 107 B. multivorans STs examined

MLST locus Allele size (bp) No. of alleles
atpD 443 23
gltB 400 33
gyrB 454 43
recA 393 29
lepA 397 27
phaC 385 13
trpB 301 28

Diversity of B. multivorans strains.

In order to investigate the relationships and diversity of the B. multivorans isolates, two methods were used: concatenation and phylogenetic analysis of the nucleotide sequences for all seven MLST loci (2). We analyzed the concatenated sequences (2,773 bp) for the 64 B. multivorans STs alongside the 114 STs of all BCC species used to validate the BCC MLST scheme (2). B. multivorans was clearly resolved (100% bootstraps based on 1,000 randomizations) into a broad cluster distinct from all other BCC species (Fig. 1) concurrent with the identification of all isolates as representing B. multivorans prior to this study. The average concatenated nucleotide diversity among B. multivorans strains was 1.0%, with the greatest diversity representing no more than 2.0% nucleotide divergence. This phylogenetic analysis identified a separate subgroup within B. multivorans comprised of STs 188, 194, 308, 320, 390, and 397 (Fig. 1), all of which demonstrated clear evidence of interspecies recombination events (see the supplemental material).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Phylogenetic tree of concatenated sequence for the MLST alleles for B. multivorans STs in the context of other BCC species by use of the neighbor-joining Jukes-Cantor method, with STs exhibiting interspecies recombination among the MLST loci indicated.

Global distribution and regional outbreaks of B. multivorans infections.

In order to determine whether there are globally distributed B. multivorans strains in cases of CF infection we examined the prevalence of several isolates previously implicated in cases of patient-to-patient spread among isolates in a diverse global collection.

A globally distributed strain (ST-16) was found; among the isolates found in the global distribution was an isolate previously reported as being an epidemic strain causing patient-patient spread (31). This isolate, originally reported as part of another large B. multivorans outbreak in France among 22 CF patients that was caused by a strain of PCR ribotype X (31), was identified as ST-16 and was also found to have infected CF patients in Belgium (strain LMG14273), Australia (BCC0247), Canada (C6558), and New Zealand (SBL03-088 and SBL04-172) and a non-CF patient in the United States (CEP0600).

In addition to ST-16, a further 11 STs were identified among isolates found in more than one country over more than a decade: ST-17 (New Zealand and the United States), ST-18 (Canada and the United Kingdom), ST-21 (Canada and the United States), ST-24 (Canada and Brazil), ST-181 (Czech Republic and New Zealand), ST-190 (Canada and the United States), ST-195 (Canada and the United Kingdom), ST-198 (Canada and the United States), ST-270 (Canada and Belgium), ST-274 (Australia and New Zealand), and ST-375 (Belgium and Portugal). Note that the high representation of some countries in this list may be due largely to ascertainment bias based on disproportionate contribution of isolates to this study. Overall, half of the clonal complexes identified (CC1, CC4, CC5, and CC6) were clearly found to be distributed among different countries (including Canada, the United Kingdom, the United States, France, Portugal, Belgium, New Zealand, and Australia) on different continents. A further clonal complex (CC3) was found in clinical isolations in different countries on the same continent (Czech Republic and France).

For all cases of implied patient-to-patient spread examined, unique STs were found in each instance, with no further matches found within our global collection: ST-27 caused an outbreak among CF patients in Glasgow (38), ST-25 (previously named strain OBHM) was shared by U.S. patients (4), ST-180 caused multiple infections at a single treatment center (Prague, Czech Republic) among CF and non-CF patients, ST-179 (previously named strain TUL2) was shared by U.S. patients (4), ST-199 was shared by Canadian siblings with CF (26), ST-15 caused an outbreak among CF patients in South Wales (27), and ST-419 was found in an isolate causing an outbreak among 32 patients in France with PCR ribotype F. Interestingly, ST-15 (the South Wales outbreak strain) was also found in a clonal complex (CC1; supplemental material) with ST-16 (the globally distributed strain also identified as being part of a French outbreak).

Identification of recombination.

By comparing the allelic variations present within clonal complexes, it is possible to suggest whether the changes are due to point mutation (clonal evolution) or to recombination events. For example, when six alleles are identical between two STs in a clonal complex but one allele is different with respect to numerous nucleotides, this is likely the result of recombination. However, point mutations usually give rise to novel alleles, so wherever a change was identified and that allele was already commonly found in the MLST database, it was considered to have occurred through recombination (see the supplemental material). Among the eight clonal complexes identified, the allelic changes mostly appeared to be due to either intraspecies recombination or interspecies recombination, with only one change presumably by point mutation (see the supplemental material).

As the BCC MLST scheme incorporates at least nine species in a single approach it facilitates our identification of genetic exchange between MLST loci of different BCC species. Of the 15 alleles identified as having occurred through recombination the majority of these (8 alleles; 53%) appear to have arisen more specifically through interspecies recombination with other BCC species. In total, among the 64 B. multivorans STs, 12.7% (8 STs) exhibit alleles that are between 3.9% and 7.3% different from all other B. multivorans alleles and are either the same as or only one (0.3%) nucleotide divergent from alleles common to other BCC species (five alleles of B. cenocepacia [ET-12 lineage], two alleles from B. stabilis, and one allele from B. cepacia).

DISCUSSION

Typing methods for the unequivocal characterization of isolates are essential for global epidemiological and evolutionary analysis of bacterial pathogens. However, methodological differences in genotyping techniques have thus far limited the analysis of B. multivorans population genetics. Strain typing based on the comparison of DNA sequences rather than genome organizations or restriction fragments is a more reliable and an unambiguous indicator of strain identification. MLST has been shown to be an easily transferable, precise, and reproducible tool for typing BCC species (1, 2, 11, 20, 37). It is a simple tool that can offer a high level of strain identification without using polyphasic techniques. The sequence information is deposited in an online database resource accessible via the World Wide Web, which facilitates multicenter collaborative analysis in a way not previously possible. MLST is an important tool in assessing B. multivorans epidemiology, and it can be used to clearly identify widely distributed strains and assist in the global infection control of this pathogens. In the current study, MLST was for the first time able to demonstrate the characteristics of globally distributed B. multivorans CF strains and provide a unique insight into the population biology of this pathogen.

The prevalences of each BCC species in CF are not equal, with B. cenocepacia and B. multivorans being most prominent (19, 21, 25, 28). Historically, B. cenocepacia strains were responsible for the largest epidemics among CF communities in Canada (23, 32) and the United Kingdom (13) during the 1980s and 1990s before strict infection control measures were introduced (29). In addition, several B. cenocepacia strains have reached an epidemic status within CF communities and are extremely virulent. Therefore, the issue of strain transmissibility is of major importance to individuals with CF and the treatment centers that provide their care. In contrast to B. cenocepacia, where direct patient-to-patient contact and socialization have been reported as the most probable mechanisms by which infections were spread (13, 26), the mode of transmission for B. multivorans infection has not been determined. Several reports have identified multiple patients in a specific area who acquired the same B. multivorans strain at the same time (4, 26, 27, 31, 38).

MLST concatenated sequence analysis, as predicted from a previous MLST study, (2), clearly distinguished the 64 B. multivorans STs from all other BCC species (100% bootstraps). The diversity seen among the B. multivorans STs corresponds to that seen in other large studies of the prevalence of B. multivorans strains in CF patients (26, 34).

Where spread of a B. multivorans strain had been reported, MLST corresponded in each instance to the original finding that a single strain type was responsible (see the supplemental material). No further infections with seven of these outbreak strains (ST-15, ST-25, ST-27, ST-117, ST-179, ST-199, and ST-419) have been reported or were found in this study; however, we were able to identify four independent ST-16 isolates (see the supplemental material) recovered from clinical infections outside of France, where the first CF-related outbreak of this strain was reported (30, 31). B. multivorans ST-16 was found in six countries on three continents; this represents the first reported globally distributed B. multivorans strain causing infections in individuals with and without CF. The global presence (see the supplemental material) and regional outbreaks (30, 31) of ST-16 suggest that this B. multivorans strain may represent a more transmissible CF lineage, such as those of B. cenocepacia ET-12 (25) and PHDC (6). There was no epidemiological evidence to link the spread of B. multivorans among patients of different geographic regions. Although ST-16 was originally identified as an epidemic strain in France (30, 31) and has been found to be the most common ST within isolates examined among different nonsibling patients in the Auckland area of New Zealand (C. Pope, unpublished data), it does not appear to have spread within the other four additional locations in which it has been recovered (see the supplemental material). This observation may reflect differences in hygiene policies and host susceptibilities or subtle genomic differences among isolates of this strain that may have profound effects upon transmissibility. A finding which adds weight to the notion that ST-16 is perhaps better adapted to human infection than other B. multivorans strains is that it is just a single-locus variant (trpB) of ST-15 and hence part of a clonal complex (CC1; see the supplemental material); thus, two closely related strain types were each associated with infection in multiple patients (27, 30, 31).

In total, 18.5% of B. multivorans strains (ST-16, ST-17, ST-18, ST-21, ST-24, ST-181, ST-190, ST-195, ST-198, ST-270, ST-274, and ST-375) were found to be dispersed across multiple countries. The observation that in the same locations, some genotypes remain unique to individual patients whereas other genotypes infect several patients is consistent with some strains having a higher degree of transmissibility, but transmission may not be via patient contact alone. Acquisition from environmental sources should be considered (1), and the prevalence of certain strains among clinical isolates may also reflect the distribution of B. multivorans in contaminated products and local environments. The recent description of a major outbreak among CF patients linked to contaminated commercial saline solutions (10) highlights the fact that despite stringent infection control guidelines and the limited individual contact advocated by the CF community, contamination still provides a potential source of infection. MLST is highly suited to identifying such links between source, contamination, and infection (1, 20).

Though many unique STs were identified in isolates from CF patients, there was also evidence for B. multivorans strains having undergone recombination. An ability to exchange genetic material is of growing clinical interest and concern, as recombination of even a single gene could have profound effects, including increased resistance to antimicrobials, increased virulence, and potential vaccine immunity in the future. Recombination of the MLST loci could be found within strains from different geographic locations and was not limited to either just clinical or just environmental isolates. Though we were able to identify recombination only among the MLST genes it is unlikely that it is limited to these, and many other genes not involved in essential processes might recombine at a higher rate. Certainly systems exist in the BCC to facilitate recombination, with an extensive presence of insertion sequences (16), phages (33), and conjugative transfer genes and genomic islands (3). We have found evidence that as many as one in eight B. multivorans strains in this study appear to have recombined with strains from other species of the BCC.

A large proportion (62.5%) of the interspecies recombination of MLST loci found for clinical B. multivorans strains was identified as genetically indistinguishable from that seen with alleles of B. cenocepacia ET-12 strains. As B. cenocepacia ET-12 is mainly isolated from clinical settings and not from the natural environment we assume not only that these species occupy the same niche but also that genetic exchange is occurring within humans and not in the natural environment. Evidence for this comes from the fact that all the recombination with the ET-12 lineage was identified within samples isolated from sputum of CF patients (ST-188, ST-194, ST-308, and ST-320). In two of these cases (ST-308 and ST-320) an earlier sputum sample revealed a B. multivorans strain that appeared to represent the same strain prior to recombination (ST-199 and ST-317). This might imply that recombination has occurred within the CF patient and not simply that acquisition of a new closely related strain had occurred (37). However, the patients whose isolates showed the presence of ST-320 and ST-308 had no exposure to ET-12-infected patients, as it was absent from the hospital environment; in the case of ST-320, the hospital has been free of ET-12 for several years. So although it is difficult to identify the specifics of how these recombination events occurred, recombination still has an important, albeit undefined, role in the long-term evolution of pathogenicity for B. multivorans strains.

As B. multivorans is one of the two most prevalent BCC species in CF infections (along with B. cenocepacia) it is important to identify environmental and clinical reservoirs and the route of acquisition by patients. Though B. multivorans is infrequently isolated from the natural environment, MLST has shown that identical STs can be isolated in nature and from clinical settings (ST-21 and ST-375). As the isolate for ST-375 (R-20526) was from a water source, this may explain the distribution of B. multivorans strains and their occurrence in geographically distinct regions (1). Furthermore, ST-373 (R-11581) was isolated from an industrial product. Our findings are consistent with the view that the use of BCC bacteria by agriculture and biotechnology industries represents a potential clinical risk to susceptible members of the community (17). We are currently seeking to evaluate more thoroughly different ecological niches such as water sources, industrial processes, and domestic products in order to identify whether any of them represents a high-risk source of B. multivorans for CF patients. The ability to carry out both strain differentiation and species identification in a single approach and then also to link globally distributed strains represents a major advance that will greatly enhance the clinical epidemiology of B. multivorans infection.

Supplementary Material

[Supplemental material]

Acknowledgments

A.B., C.G.D., and E.M. thank the Cystic Fibrosis Trust (United Kingdom) for funding this research (grant PJ 535). J.L.L. receives funding from the CF Foundation (U.S.). D.P.S. was supported with funds from the Canadian Cystic Fibrosis Foundation.

We acknowledge Lynne Richardson (Oxford University) for technical support. This publication made use of the Burkholderia cepacia complex multilocus sequence typing website (http://pubmlst.org/bcc/) developed by Keith Jolley and hosted at the University of Oxford. The development of this site had been funded by the Wellcome Trust.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 21 November 2007.

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jcm.asm.org/.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Baldwin, A., E. Mahenthiralingam, P. Drevinek, P. Vandamme, J. R. Govan, D. J. Waine, J. J. Lipuma, L. Chiarini, C. Dalmastri, D. Henry, D. P. Speert, D. Honeybourne, M. C. Maiden, and C. G. Dowson. 2007. Environmental Burkholderia cepacia complex isolates in human infection. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 13458-461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Baldwin, A., E. Mahenthiralingam, K. M. Thickett, D. Honeybourne, M. C. Maiden, J. R. Govan, D. P. Speert, J. J. Lipuma, P. Vandamme, and C. G. Dowson. 2005. Multilocus sequence typing scheme that provides both species and strain differentiation for the Burkholderia cepacia complex. J. Clin. Microbiol. 434665-4673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Baldwin, A., P. A. Sokol, J. Parkhill, and E. Mahenthiralingam. 2004. The Burkholderia cepacia epidemic strain marker is part of a novel genomic island encoding both virulence and metabolism-associated genes in Burkholderia cenocepacia. Infect. Immun. 721537-1547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Biddick, R., T. Spilker, A. Martin, and J. J. LiPuma. 2003. Evidence of transmission of Burkholderia cepacia, Burkholderia multivorans, and Burkholderia dolosa among persons with cystic fibrosis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 22857-62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chen, J. S., K. A. Witzmann, T. Spilker, R. J. Fink, and J. J. LiPuma. 2001. Endemicity and inter-city spread of Burkholderia cepacia genomovar III in cystic fibrosis. J. Pediatr. 139643-649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Coenye, T., T. Spilker, A. Van Schoor, J. J. LiPuma, and P. Vandamme. 2004. Recovery of Burkholderia cenocepacia strain PHDC from cystic fibrosis patients in Europe. Thorax 59952-954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Coenye, T., P. Vandamme, J. R. Govan, and J. J. LiPuma. 2001. Taxonomy and identification of the Burkholderia cepacia complex. J. Clin. Microbiol. 393427-3436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Coenye, T., P. Vandamme, J. J. LiPuma, J. R. Govan, and E. Mahenthiralingam. 2003. Updated version of the Burkholderia cepacia complex experimental strain panel. J. Clin. Microbiol. 412797-2798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Corey, M., and V. Farewell. 1996. Determinants of mortality from cystic fibrosis in Canada, 1970-1989. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1431007-1017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cunha, M. V., A. Pinto-de-Oliveira, L. Meirinhos-Soares, M. J. Salgado, J. Melo-Cristino, S. Correia, C. Barreto, and I. Sa-Correia. 2007. Exceptionally high representation of Burkholderia cepacia among B. cepacia complex isolates recovered from the major Portuguese cystic fibrosis center. J. Clin. Microbiol. 451628-1633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dalmastri, C., A. Baldwin, S. Tabacchioni, A. Bevivino, E. Mahenthiralingam, L. Chiarini, and C. G. Dowson. 2007. Investigating Burkholderia cepacia complex populations recovered from Italian maize rhizosphere by multilocus sequence typing. Environ. Microbiol. 91632-1639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Govan, J. R., A. R. Brown, and A. M. Jones. 2007. Evolving epidemiology of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the Burkholderia cepacia complex in cystic fibrosis lung infection. Future Microbiol. 2153-164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Govan, J. R., P. H. Brown, J. Maddison, C. J. Doherty, J. W. Nelson, M. Dodd, A. P. Greening, and A. K. Webb. 1993. Evidence for transmission of Pseudomonas cepacia by social contact in cystic fibrosis. Lancet 34215-19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Govan, J. R. W., J. Balendreau, and P. Vandamme. 2000. Burkholderia cepacia—friend and foe. ASM News 66124-125. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Heath, D. G., K. Hohneker, C. Carriker, K. Smith, J. Routh, J. J. LiPuma, R. M. Aris, D. Weber, and P. H. Gilligan. 2002. Six-year molecular analysis of Burkholderia cepacia complex isolates among cystic fibrosis patients at a referral center for lung transplantation. J. Clin. Microbiol. 401188-1193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lessie, T. G., W. Hendrickson, B. D. Manning, and R. Devereux. 1996. Genomic complexity and plasticity of Burkholderia cepacia. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 144117-128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.LiPuma, J. J., and E. Mahenthiralingam. 1999. Commercial use of Burkholderia cepacia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 5305-306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.LiPuma, J. J., T. Spilker, T. Coenye, and C. F. Gonzalez. 2002. An epidemic Burkholderia cepacia complex strain identified in soil. Lancet 3592002-2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.LiPuma, J. J., T. Spilker, L. H. Gill, P. W. Campbell III, L. Liu, and E. Mahenthiralingam. 2001. Disproportionate distribution of Burkholderia cepacia complex species and transmissibility markers in cystic fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 16492-96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mahenthiralingam, E., A. Baldwin, P. Drevinek, E. Vanlaere, P. Vandamme, J. J. Lipuma, and C. G. Dowson. 2006. Multilocus sequence typing breathes life into a microbial metagenome. PLoS ONE 1e17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mahenthiralingam, E., A. Baldwin, and P. Vandamme. 2002. Burkholderia cepacia complex infection in patients with cystic fibrosis. J. Med. Microbiol. 51533-538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mahenthiralingam, E., J. Bischof, S. K. Byrne, C. Radomski, J. E. Davies, Y. Av-Gay, and P. Vandamme. 2000. DNA-based diagnostic approaches for identification of Burkholderia cepacia complex, Burkholderia vietnamiensis, Burkholderia multivorans, Burkholderia stabilis, and Burkholderia cepacia genomovars I and III. J. Clin. Microbiol. 383165-3173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mahenthiralingam, E., M. E. Campbell, D. A. Henry, and D. P. Speert. 1996. Epidemiology of Burkholderia cepacia infection in patients with cystic fibrosis: analysis by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprinting. J. Clin. Microbiol. 342914-2920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mahenthiralingam, E., T. Coenye, J. W. Chung, D. P. Speert, J. R. Govan, P. Taylor, and P. Vandamme. 2000. Diagnostically and experimentally useful panel of strains from the Burkholderia cepacia complex. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38910-913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mahenthiralingam, E., T. A. Urban, and J. B. Goldberg. 2005. The multifarious, multireplicon Burkholderia cepacia complex. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 3144-156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mahenthiralingam, E., P. Vandamme, M. E. Campbell, D. A. Henry, A. M. Gravelle, L. T. Wong, A. G. Davidson, P. G. Wilcox, B. Nakielna, and D. P. Speert. 2001. Infection with Burkholderia cepacia complex genomovars in patients with cystic fibrosis: virulent transmissible strains of genomovar III can replace Burkholderia multivorans. Clin. Infect. Dis. 331469-1475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Millar-Jones, L., H. C. Ryley, A. Paull, and M. C. Goodchild. 1998. Transmission and prevalence of Burkholderia cepacia in Welsh cystic fibrosis patients. Respir. Med. 92178-183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Reik, R., T. Spilker, and J. J. Lipuma. 2005. Distribution of Burkholderia cepacia complex species among isolates recovered from persons with or without cystic fibrosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 432926-2928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Saiman, L., and J. Siegel. 2004. Infection control in cystic fibrosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1757-71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Segonds, C., E. Bingen, G. Couetdic, S. Mathy, N. Brahimi, N. Marty, P. Plesiat, Y. Michel-Briand, and G. Chabanon. 1997. Genotypic analysis of Burkholderia cepacia isolates from 13 French cystic fibrosis centers. J. Clin. Microbiol. 352055-2060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Segonds, C., T. Heulin, N. Marty, and G. Chabanon. 1999. Differentiation of Burkholderia species by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the 16S rRNA gene and application to cystic fibrosis isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 372201-2208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Speert, D. P., M. E. Campbell, D. A. Henry, R. Milner, F. Taha, A. Gravelle, A. G. Davidson, L. T. Wong, and E. Mahenthiralingam. 2002. Epidemiology of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis in British Columbia, Canada. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 166988-993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Summer, E. J., C. F. Gonzalez, T. Carlisle, L. M. Mebane, A. M. Cass, C. G. Savva, J. LiPuma, and R. Young. 2004. Burkholderia cenocepacia phage BcepMu and a family of Mu-like phages encoding potential pathogenesis factors. J. Mol. Biol. 34049-65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Turton, J. F., M. E. Kaufmann, N. Mustafa, S. Kawa, F. E. Clode, and T. L. Pitt. 2003. Molecular comparison of isolates of Burkholderia multivorans from patients with cystic fibrosis in the United Kingdom. J. Clin. Microbiol. 415750-5754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Vandamme, P., B. Holmes, M. Vancanneyt, T. Coenye, B. Hoste, R. Coopman, H. Revets, S. Lauwers, M. Gillis, K. Kersters, and J. R. Govan. 1997. Occurrence of multiple genomovars of Burkholderia cepacia in cystic fibrosis patients and proposal of Burkholderia multivorans sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 471188-1200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Vermis, K., T. Coenye, E. Mahenthiralingam, H. J. Nelis, and P. Vandamme. 2002. Evaluation of species-specific recA-based PCR tests for genomovar level identification within the Burkholderia cepacia complex. J. Med. Microbiol. 51937-940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Waine, D. J., D. A. Henry, A. Baldwin, D. P. Speert, D. Honeybourne, E. Mahenthiralingam, and C. G. Dowson. 2007. Reliability of multilocus sequence typing of the Burkholderia cepacia complex in cystic fibrosis. J. Cyst. Fibros. 6215-219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Whiteford, M. L., J. D. Wilkinson, J. H. McColl, F. M. Conlon, J. R. Michie, T. J. Evans, and J. Y. Paton. 1995. Outcome of Burkholderia (Pseudomonas) cepacia colonisation in children with cystic fibrosis following a hospital outbreak. Thorax 501194-1198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

[Supplemental material]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES