Skip to main content
The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology logoLink to The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology
. 1958 Jul 25;4(4):391–400. doi: 10.1083/jcb.4.4.391

Cytological Effects of Prefixation Treatment

David A Hungerford 1, Marie DiBerardino 1
PMCID: PMC2224507  PMID: 13563546

Abstract

The effects produced by prefixation treatments on cells in metaphase from 10-day mouse fetuses and from several embryonic stages of the frog were investigated. The technical value of some of these pretreatments is noted. Pretreatment with isotonic solutions (both ionic and non-ionic in the case of the mouse, ionic only in the frog) generally produced a similar effect, viz., chromosomal swelling with little effect on the spindle. A notable exception is provided by frog embryos preceding the neurula stage; spindle disorganization without chromosomal swelling was produced by pretreatment in isotonic modified Niu-Twitty solution, containing no divalent cations. Pretreatment with hypotonic solutions (both ionic and non-ionic in the case of the mouse, ionic only in the frog) generally produced several major effects, viz., despiralization of chromosomes, chromatid separation, and spindle disorganization. The conclusion is drawn from the mouse data that, in order to produce these effects, pretreating solutions must be of low osmotic pressure. Low ionic strength alone (e.g., isotonic sucrose solutions) is not sufficient. As differentiation of frog embryos progressed, pretreatments either of longer duration or with solutions of increasing degrees of hypotonicity were required to produce comparable intensities of the same effects. Many of the effects on metaphases produced by hypotonic pretreatment of frog embryos were reversible by subsequent exposure to isotonic solutions. The significance of results presented here is discussed briefly with respect to some current considerations of the macromolecular structure of chromosomes.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (907.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BLANK H., McCARTHY P. L., DeLAMATER E. D. A non-vacuum freezing-dehydrating technic for histology, autoradiography and microbial cytology. Stain Technol. 1951 Jul;26(3):193–197. doi: 10.3109/10520295109113207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. FORD C. E., HAMERTON J. L. A colchicine, hypotonic citrate, squash sequence for mammalian chromosomes. Stain Technol. 1956 Nov;31(6):247–251. doi: 10.3109/10520295609113814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. KING T. J., BRIGGS R. Serial transplantation of embryonic nuclei. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1956;21:271–290. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1956.021.01.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kaufmann B. P., McDonald M. R. THE NATURE OF THE CHANGES EFFECTED IN CHROMOSOMAL MATERIALS BY THE CHELATING AGENT EDTA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1957 Mar 15;43(3):262–270. doi: 10.1073/pnas.43.3.262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. King T. J., Briggs R. CHANGES IN THE NUCLEI OF DIFFERENTIATING GASTRULA CELLS, AS DEMONSTRATED BY NUCLEAR TRANSPLANTATION. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1955 May 15;41(5):321–325. doi: 10.1073/pnas.41.5.321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mazia D. THE PARTICULATE ORGANIZATION OF THE CHROMOSOME. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1954 Jun;40(6):521–527. doi: 10.1073/pnas.40.6.521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Niu M. C., Twitty V. C. The Differentiation of Gastrula Ectoderm in Medium Conditioned by Axial Mesoderm. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1953 Sep;39(9):985–989. doi: 10.1073/pnas.39.9.985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Schultz J., Macduffee R. C., Anderson T. F. Smear Preparations for the Electron Microscopy of Animal Chromosomes. Science. 1949 Jul 1;110(2844):5–7. doi: 10.1126/science.110.2844.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Steffensen D. BREAKAGE OF CHROMOSOMES IN Tradescantia WITH A CALCIUM DEFICIENCY. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1955 Mar 15;41(3):155–160. doi: 10.1073/pnas.41.3.155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wolff S., Luippold H. E. THE PRODUCTION OF TWO CHEMICALLY DIFFERENT TYPES OF CHROMOSOMAL BREAKS BY IONIZING RADIATIONS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1956 Aug;42(8):510–514. doi: 10.1073/pnas.42.8.510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES