Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology logoLink to The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology
. 1960 Feb 1;7(1):167–180. doi: 10.1083/jcb.7.1.167

Studies on the Endoplasmic Reticulum

IV. Its Form and Distribution during Mitosis in Cells of Onion Root Tip

Keith R Porter 1, Raul D Machado 1
PMCID: PMC2224856  PMID: 14434278

Abstract

Cells of onion and garlic root tips were examined under the electron and phase contrast microscopes after fixation in KMnO4. Special attention was focused on the distribution and behavior of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) during the several phases of mitosis. Slender profiles, recognized as sections through thin lamellar units of the ER (most prominent in KMnO4-fixed material), are distributed more or less uniformly in the cytoplasm of interphase cells and show occasional continuity with the nuclear envelope. In late prophase the nuclear envelope breaks down and its remnants plus cytoplasmic elements of the ER, which are morphologically identical, surround the spindle in a zone from which mitochondria, etc., are excluded. During metaphase these ER elements persist and concentrate as two separate systems in the polar caps or zones of the spindle. At about this same time they begin to proliferate and to invade the ends of the spindle. The invading lamellar units form drape-like partitions between the anaphase chromosomes. In late anaphase, their advancing margins reach the middle zone of the spindle and begin to fray out. Finally, in telophase, while elements of the ER in the poles of the spindle coalesce around the chromosomes to form the new envelope, the advancing edges of those in the middle zone reticulate at the level of the equator to form a close lattice of tubular elements. Within this, which is identified as the phragmoplast, the earliest signs of the cell plate appear in the form of small vesicles. These subsequently grow and fuse to complete the separation of the two protoplasts. Other morphological units apparently participating in mitosis are described. Speculation is provided on the equal division or not of the nuclear envelope and the contribution the envelope fragments make to the ER of the new cell.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (4.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BAJER A. Ciné-micrographic studies on mitosis in endosperm. III. The origin of the mitotic spindle. Exp Cell Res. 1957 Dec;13(3):493–502. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(57)90078-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BAJER A. Ciné-micrographic studies on mitosis in endosperm. IV. The mitotic contraction stage. Exp Cell Res. 1958 Apr;14(2):245–256. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(58)90183-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BARER R., JOSEPH S., MEEK G. A. The origin of the nuclear membrane. Exp Cell Res. 1959 Aug;18:179–182. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(59)90304-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BELLAIRS R. The development of the nervous system in chick embryos, studied by electron microscopy. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1959 Mar;7(1):94–115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. BOSS J. Mitosis in cultures of newt tissues. IV. The cell surface in late anaphase and the movements of ribonucleoprotein. Exp Cell Res. 1955 Feb;8(1):181–187. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(55)90055-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. CAULFIELD J. B. Effects of varying the vehicle for OsO4 in tissue fixation. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1957 Sep 25;3(5):827–830. doi: 10.1083/jcb.3.5.827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. GROSS P. R., PHILPOTT D. E., NASS S. The fine-structure of the mitotic spindle in sea urchin eggs. J Ultrastruct Res. 1958 Nov;2(1):55–72. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(58)90047-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. LUFT J. H. Permanganate; a new fixative for electron microscopy. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1956 Nov 25;2(6):799–802. doi: 10.1083/jcb.2.6.799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. MOORE D. H., GRIMLEY P. H. Problems in methacrylate embedding for electron microscopy. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1957 Mar 25;3(2):255–260. doi: 10.1083/jcb.3.2.255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. ORNSTEIN L., POLLISTER A. W. Applications of phase microscopy in cytology and electron micrography. Trans N Y Acad Sci. 1952 Mar;14(5):194–199. doi: 10.1111/j.2164-0947.1952.tb01097.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. PALADE G. E. A small particulate component of the cytoplasm. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1955 Jan;1(1):59–68. doi: 10.1083/jcb.1.1.59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. PALADE G. E. A study of fixation for electron microscopy. J Exp Med. 1952 Mar;95(3):285–298. doi: 10.1084/jem.95.3.285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. PEACHEY L. D. Thin sections. I. A study of section thickness and physical distortion produced during microtomy. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1958 May 25;4(3):233–242. doi: 10.1083/jcb.4.3.233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. PORTER K. R. Electron microscopy of basophilic components of cytoplasm. J Histochem Cytochem. 1954 Sep;2(5):346–375. doi: 10.1177/2.5.346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. PORTER K. R. Observations on a submicroscopic basophilic component of cytoplasm. J Exp Med. 1953 May;97(5):727–750. doi: 10.1084/jem.97.5.727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. PORTER K. R. The submicroscopic morphology of protoplasm. Harvey Lect. 1955;51:175–228. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. RUSTAD R. C. An interference microscopical and cytochemical analysis of local mass changes in the mitotic apparatus during mitosis. Exp Cell Res. 1959 Mar;16(3):575–583. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(59)90125-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. RYTER A., KELLENBERGER E. L'inclusion au polyester pour l'ultramicrotomie. J Ultrastruct Res. 1958 Dec;2(2):200–214. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(58)90018-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. SATIR P. G., PEACHEY L. D. Thin sections. II. A simple method for reducing compression artifacts. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1958 May 25;4(3):345–348. doi: 10.1083/jcb.4.3.345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. SELBY C. C. Electron micrographs of mitotic cells of the Ehrlich mouse ascites tumor in thin sections. Exp Cell Res. 1953 Dec;5(2):386–393. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(53)90222-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. TAYLOR E. W. Dynamics of spindle formation and its inhibition by chemicals. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1959 Oct;6:193–196. doi: 10.1083/jcb.6.2.193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. WATSON M. L. Further observations on the nuclear envelope of the animal cell. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1959 Oct;6:147–156. doi: 10.1083/jcb.6.2.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. WATSON M. L. Staining of tissue sections for electron microscopy with heavy metals. II. Application of solutions containing lead and barium. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1958 Nov 25;4(6):727–730. doi: 10.1083/jcb.4.6.727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. WATSON M. L. The nuclear envelope; its structure and relation to cytoplasmic membranes. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1955 May 25;1(3):257–270. doi: 10.1083/jcb.1.3.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. WHALEY W. G., MOLLENHAUER H. H., KEPHART J. E. The endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi structures in maize root cells. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1959 May 25;5(3):501–506. doi: 10.1083/jcb.5.3.501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES