Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology logoLink to The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology
. 1961 Apr 1;9(4):825–839. doi: 10.1083/jcb.9.4.825

THE ULTRASTRUCTURE OF AMELOBLASTS DURING MATRIX FORMATION AND THE MATURATION OF ENAMEL

Edward J Reith 1
PMCID: PMC2225039  PMID: 13740699

Abstract

Ameloblasts from different regions of upper incisors of rats were examined with the electron microscope. During matrix formation, the cells resemble secretory cells. They are extremely long, tightly packed, and show considerable polarity. Nuclei are at the basal end of the cell. Mitochondria are proximal and the Golgi apparatus distal to the nucleus. Ergastoplasm is found in all levels but mainly in the distal end. A terminal bar apparatus separates the distal end of the cell from Tomes's process. Next to this is soft enamel. The next incisal region is a transitional zone in which the ameloblasts separate easily from the enamel. Endoplasmic reticulum is dilated and very obviously in communication with the perinuclear space. Mitochondria are present not only proximal, but also distal, to the nucleus. The next incisal zone consists of cells related to the maturation of enamel. They no longer resemble secretory cells, but now have more characteristics of transporting cells. Processes from the distal end of the cell are present with mitochondria closely applied to the base of the processes. A considerable amount of intercellular space exists with microvilli projecting into the space. Iron granules appear in these cells, and the ergastoplasmic cisternae are dilated. In the incisal end of this zone, the iron granules form aggregates. The iron finally leaves the cells to enter the enamel. Free RNP particles and fibrils become more evident after the iron leaves the cells. In the most incisal region, the ameloblasts are further reduced in height. Distal processes are no longer present and fibrils are more conspicuous.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.9 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BATTISTONE G. C., BURNETT G. W. Studies of the composition of teeth. V. Variations in the amino acid composition of dentin and enamel. J Dent Res. 1956 Apr;35(2):263–272. doi: 10.1177/00220345560350021701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BUTCHER E. O. Pigment formation in the rats incisor. J Dent Res. 1953 Feb;32(1):133–137. doi: 10.1177/00220345530320010601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. FRANK R. M., SOGNNAES R. F. Electron microscopy of matrix formation and calcification in rat enamel. Arch Oral Biol. 1960 Mar;1:339–348. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(60)90095-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. GOLDBERG B., GREEN H. Immune cytolysis. 1. The release of ribonucleoprotein particles. 2. Membrane-bounded structures arising during cell fragmentation. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1960 Jul;7:645–650. doi: 10.1083/jcb.7.4.645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. IRVING J. T. Macrophages in the periodontal tissues of rats' incisor teeth. Nature. 1952 Oct 4;170(4327):573–574. doi: 10.1038/170573b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. KARRER H. E. The ultrastructure of mouse lung: the alveolar macrophage. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1958 Nov 25;4(6):693–700. doi: 10.1083/jcb.4.6.693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. KERR D. N., MUIR A. R. A demonstration of the structure and disposition of ferritin in the human liver cell. J Ultrastruct Res. 1960 Feb;3:313–319. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(60)80017-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. MARSLAND E. A. A histological investigation of amelogenesis in rats. I. Matrix formation. Br Dent J. 1951 Nov 20;91(10):251–261. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. PALADE G. E. A study of fixation for electron microscopy. J Exp Med. 1952 Mar;95(3):285–298. doi: 10.1084/jem.95.3.285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. PINDBORG J. J., WEINMANN J. P. Morphologic and functional correlations in the enamel organ of the rat incisor during amelogenesis. Acta Anat (Basel) 1959;36(4):367–381. doi: 10.1159/000141450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. QUIGLEY M. B. Electron microscopy of developing enamel matrix in the Syrian hamster. J Dent Res. 1959 Jan-Feb;38(1):180–187. doi: 10.1177/00220345590380011301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. REITH E. J. The ultra structure of ameloblasts from the growing end of rat incisors. Arch Oral Biol. 1960 Oct;2:253–262. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(60)90067-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. SLAUTTERBACK D. B., FAWCETT D. W. The development of the cnidoblasts of Hydra; an electron microscope study of cell differentiation. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1959 May 25;5(3):441–452. doi: 10.1083/jcb.5.3.441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. SYMONS N. B. Alkaline phosphatase activity in the developing teeth of the rat. J Anat. 1955 Apr;89(2):238–245. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. SYMONS N. B. Ribonucleic acid-alkaline phosphatase distribution in the developing teeth of the rat. J Anat. 1956 Jan;90(1):117–122. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. WATSON M. L., AVERY J. K. The development of the hamster lower incisor as observed by electron microscopy. Am J Anat. 1954 Jul;95(1):109–161. doi: 10.1002/aja.1000950105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. WATSON M. L. The extracellular nature of enamel in the rat. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1960 Jun;7:489–492. doi: 10.1083/jcb.7.3.489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES