Skip to main content
The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology logoLink to The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology
. 1961 Aug 1;10(4):467–474. doi: 10.1083/jcb.10.4.467

THE DIRECT ISOLATION OF THE MITOTIC APPARATUS

Daniel Mazia 1, J M Mitchison 1, Heitor Medina 1, Patricia Harris 1
PMCID: PMC2225108  PMID: 13768661

Abstract

A method for isolating the mitotic apparatus from dividing sea urchin eggs without the use of ethyl alcohol or of detergents is described. In the present method, the eggs are dispersed directly in a medium containing 1 M (to 1.15 M) sucrose, 0.15 M dithiodiglycol, and 0.001 M Versene at pH 6, releasing the visibly intact mitotic apparatus. The method is designed for studies of enzyme activities, lipid components, and the variables affecting the stability of the apparatus.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (659.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ANDERSON N. G. Cell division. II. A theoretical approach to chromosomal movements and the division of the cell. Q Rev Biol. 1956 Dec;31(4):243–269. doi: 10.1086/401478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BERNHARD W., DE HARVEN E. Etude au microscope électronique de l'ultrastructure du centriole chez les vertébrés. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1956;45(3):378–398. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. INOUE S. On the physical properties of the mitotic spindle. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1960 Oct 7;90:529–530. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1960.tb23269.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. KAWAMURA N. Cytochemical and quantitative study of protein-bound sulfhydryl and disulfide groups in eggs of Arbacia during the first cleavage. Exp Cell Res. 1960 Jun;20:127–138. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(60)90229-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. KAWAMURA N., DAN K. A cytochemical study of the sulfhydryl groups of sea urchin eggs during the first cleavage. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1958 Sep 25;4(5):615–619. doi: 10.1083/jcb.4.5.615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. MAZIA D., ZIMMERMAN A. M. SH compounds in mitosis. II. The effect of mercaptoethanol on the structure of the mitotic apparatus in sea urchin eggs. Exp Cell Res. 1958 Aug;15(1):138–153. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(58)90070-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mazia D., Dan K. The Isolation and Biochemical Characterization of the Mitotic Apparatus of Dividing Cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1952 Sep;38(9):826–838. doi: 10.1073/pnas.38.9.826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. RUSTAD R. C. An interference microscopical and cytochemical analysis of local mass changes in the mitotic apparatus during mitosis. Exp Cell Res. 1959 Mar;16(3):575–583. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(59)90125-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. SAKAI H., DAN K. Studies on sulfhydryl groups during cell division of sea urchin egg. I. Glutatione. Exp Cell Res. 1959 Jan;16(1):24–41. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(59)90192-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. WENT H. A. Studies on the mitotic apparatus of the sea urchin by means of antigen-antibody reactions in agar. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1959 Dec;6:447–455. doi: 10.1083/jcb.6.3.447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. ZIMMERMAN A. M. Physico-chemical analysis of the isolated mitotic apparatus. Exp Cell Res. 1960 Sep;20:529–547. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(60)90122-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES