Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology logoLink to The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology
. 1961 Oct 1;11(1):157–169. doi: 10.1083/jcb.11.1.157

THE FINE STRUCTURE OF INHIBITORY SYNAPSES IN THE CRAYFISH

R Price Peterson 1, Frank A Pepe 1
PMCID: PMC2225121  PMID: 14485811

Abstract

Physiological investigations have shown that the synaptic input to the sensory neuron of the stretch receptor in the abdominal muscles of the crayfish is purely inhibitory. This neuron was chosen, therefore, as a site in which to study the fine structure of inhibitory synaptic endings. It was hoped that this fine structure might (a) provide a morphological prototype for the study of more complex synaptic systems and (b) reflect the inhibitory mechanisms. Stretch receptors were fixed in situ in buffered OsO4, dehydrated, and embedded in Araldite. Both cross and longitudinal sections were examined after staining with phosphotungstic acid. The inhibitory endings were easily identified by their great similarity to previously described excitatory endings. Small circular profiles (synaptic vesicles) about 460 A in diameter and an accumulation of mitochondria were consistently observed within the presynaptic endings. An increased osmiophilia of pre- and postsynaptic membranes, where they were in apposition, was also seen. The only observed difference between these inhibitory endings and excitatory endings, described by other authors, was the variable presence of a latticework of 230 A tubules in the connective tissue immediately adjacent to the inhibitory endings. Inhibitory endings were observed on all parts of the sensory neuron except the axon.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BENNETT H. S., LUFT J. H. zeta-Collidine as a basis for buffering fixatives. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1959 Aug;6(1):113–114. doi: 10.1083/jcb.6.1.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BIRKS R. I., MACINTOSH F. C. Acetylcholine metabolism at nerve-endings. Br Med Bull. 1957 Sep;13(3):157–161. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a069605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BIRKS R., HUXLEY H. E., KATZ B. The fine structure of the neuromuscular junction of the frog. J Physiol. 1960 Jan;150:134–144. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BIRKS R., KATZ B., MILEDI R. Physiological and structural changes at the amphibian myoneural junction, in the course of nerve degeneration. J Physiol. 1960 Jan;150:145–168. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. CAUSEY G., BARTON A. A. Synapses in the superior cervical ganglion and their changes under experimental conditions. Exp Cell Res. 1958;14(Suppl 5):338–346. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DE LORENZO A. J. The fine structure of synapses in the ciliary ganglion of the chick. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1960 Feb;7:31–36. doi: 10.1083/jcb.7.1.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. DE ROBERTIS E. Submicroscopic morphology and function of the synapse. Exp Cell Res. 1958;14(Suppl 5):347–369. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. EDWARDS C., HAGIWARA S. Potassium ions and the inhibitory process in the crayfish stretch receptor. J Gen Physiol. 1959 Nov;43:315–321. doi: 10.1085/jgp.43.2.315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. EDWARDS C., OTTOSON D. The site of impulse initiation in a nerve cell of a crustacean stretch receptor. J Physiol. 1958 Aug 29;143(1):138–148. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. FLOREY E., FLOREY E. Microanatomy of the abdominal stretch receptors of the crayfish (Astacus fluviatilis L.). J Gen Physiol. 1955 Sep 20;39(1):69–85. doi: 10.1085/jgp.39.1.69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. KUFFLER S. W., EDWARDS C. Mechanism of gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) action and its relation to synaptic inhibition. J Neurophysiol. 1958 Nov;21(6):589–610. doi: 10.1152/jn.1958.21.6.589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. KUFFLER S. W., EYZAGUIRRE C. Synaptic inhibition in an isolated nerve cell. J Gen Physiol. 1955 Sep 20;39(1):155–184. doi: 10.1085/jgp.39.1.155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. MAYNARD E. A., MAYNARD D. M. Cholinesterase in the crustacean muscle receptor organ. J Histochem Cytochem. 1960 Sep;8:376–379. doi: 10.1177/8.5.376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. PALAY S. L. The morphology of synapses in the central nervous system. Exp Cell Res. 1958;14(Suppl 5):275–293. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. ROBERTSON J. D. The ultrastructure of a reptilian myoneural junction. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1956 Jul 25;2(4):381–394. doi: 10.1083/jcb.2.4.381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. WHITTAKER V. P. The isolation and characterization of acetylcholine-containing particles from brain. Biochem J. 1959 Aug;72:694–706. doi: 10.1042/bj0720694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES