Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology logoLink to The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology
. 1961 Dec 1;11(3):559–570. doi: 10.1083/jcb.11.3.559

ON THE FINE STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION OF THE NUCLEAR ENVELOPE

R W Merriam 1
PMCID: PMC2225132  PMID: 14472877

Abstract

Nuclei from nearly ripe eggs of Rana pipiens were isolated and cleaned in 0.1 M KCl. The whole nucleus was then digested to various degrees with ribonuclease or trypsin, followed by washing and fixation in either osmium tetroxide or potassium permanganate. The nuclear envelope was dissected off, placed on a grid, air dried, and compared with undigested controls in the electron microscope. Some envelopes were dehydrated, embedded in methacrylate, and sectioned. Annuli around "pores" are composed of a substance or substances, at least partially fibrillar, which is preserved by osmium but lost during permanganate fixation. Material within the "pores" is also preserved by osmium but partially lost after permanganate. No evidence of granules or tubules in the annuli was found in air dried mounts although a granular appearance could be seen in tangentially oriented thin sections. Thin sections of isolated envelopes give evidence of diffuse material within the "pores" as well as a more condensed diaphragm across their waists. In whole mounts of the envelope the total density within "pores" is relatively constant from "pore" to "pore." All material within "pores," including the condensed diaphragm, is removable by trypsin digestion. Wispy material from the "pore" structure projects into the nucleus and annular material extends into the cytoplasm. Both annular and diaphragm materials remain with the envelope when it is isolated and are thus considered a part of its structure, not merely evidences of material passing through. There is no evidence of ribonuclease-removable material in any part of the "pore" complex.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AFZELIUS B. A. The ultrastructure of the nuclear membrane of the sea urchin oocyte as studied with the electron microscope. Exp Cell Res. 1955 Feb;8(1):147–158. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(55)90051-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BAIRATI A., LEHMANN F. E. Uber die subroikroskopische Struktur der Kernmembran bei Amoeba proteus. Experientia. 1952 Feb 15;8(2):60–62. doi: 10.1007/BF02139020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BEAMS H. W., TAHMISIAN T. N., DEVINE R., ANDERSON E. The fine structure of the nuclear envelope of Endamoeba blattae. Exp Cell Res. 1959 Oct;18:366–369. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(59)90016-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. CALLAN H. G., TOMLIN S. G. Experimental studies on amphibian oocyte nuclei. I. Investigation of the structure of the nuclear membrane by means of the electron microscope. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1950 Oct 13;137(888):367–378. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1950.0047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. COHEN A. I. Electron microscopic observations of amoeba proteus in growth and inanition. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1957 Nov 25;3(6):859–866. doi: 10.1083/jcb.3.6.859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DALTON A. J., ZEIGEL R. F. A simplified method of staining thin sections of biolgical material with lead hydroxide for electron microscopy. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1960 Apr;7:409–410. doi: 10.1083/jcb.7.2.409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. FRAJOLA W. J., GREIDER M. H., KOSTIR W. J. Electron microscopy of the nuclear membrane of Amoeba proteus. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1956 Jul 25;2(4 Suppl):445–448. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. GALL J. G. Observations on the nuclear membrane with the electron microscope. Exp Cell Res. 1954 Aug;7(1):197–200. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(54)90054-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. GALL J. G. Small granules in the amphibian oocyte nucleus and their relationship to RNA. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1956 Jul 25;2(4 Suppl):393–396. doi: 10.1083/jcb.2.4.393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. GALL J. G. The nuclear envelope after KMnO4 fixation. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1959 Aug;6(1):115–118. doi: 10.1083/jcb.6.1.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HARRIS P., JAMES T. W. Electron microscope study of the nuclear membrane of Amoeba proteus in thin section. Experientia. 1952 Oct 15;8(10):384–385. doi: 10.1007/BF02176196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. KAUTZ J., DE MARSH Q. B. Fine structure of the nuclear membrane in cells from the chick embryo: on the nature of the socalled "pores" in the nuclear membrane. Exp Cell Res. 1955 Apr;8(2):394–396. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(55)90149-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. MARINOS N. G. The nuclear envelope of plant cells. J Ultrastruct Res. 1960 Feb;3:328–333. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(60)80019-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. MERRIAM R. W. The origin and fate of annulate lamellae in maturing sand dollar eggs. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1959 Jan 25;5(1):117–122. doi: 10.1083/jcb.5.1.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McGRATH R. A. Oscillation of the nucleus and mitotic figure in the neuroblast of the grasshopper Chortophaga viridifasciata (De Geer). Exp Cell Res. 1959 Feb;16(2):459–462. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(59)90283-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. PAPPAS G. D. The fine structure of the nuclear envelope of Amoeba proteus. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1956 Jul 25;2(4 Suppl):431–434. doi: 10.1083/jcb.2.4.431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. PORTER K. R. The submicroscopic morphology of protoplasm. Harvey Lect. 1955;51:175–228. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. REBHUN L. I. Electron microscopy of basophilic structures of some invertebrate oocytes. I. Periodic lamellane and the nuclear envelope. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1956 Jan 25;2(1):93–104. doi: 10.1083/jcb.2.1.93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. RUTHMANN A. Basophilic lamellar systems in the crayfish spermatocyte. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1958 May 25;4(3):267–274. doi: 10.1083/jcb.4.3.267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. SENO S., YOSHIZAWA K. Electron microscope observations on frozen-dried cells. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1960 Dec;8:617–638. doi: 10.1083/jcb.8.3.617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. WATSON M. L. Further observations on the nuclear envelope of the animal cell. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1959 Oct;6:147–156. doi: 10.1083/jcb.6.2.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. WATSON M. L. The nuclear envelope; its structure and relation to cytoplasmic membranes. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1955 May 25;1(3):257–270. doi: 10.1083/jcb.1.3.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES