Abstract
Antimicrobial activity of organic and aqueous extracts from fruits, leaves and roots of Tribulus terrestris L., an Iraqi medicinal plant used as urinary anti-infective in folk medicine, was examined against 11 species of pathogenic and non-pathogenic microorganisms: Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus cereus, Corynebacterium diphtheriae, Escherichia coli, Proteus vulgaris, Serratia marcescens, Salmonella typhimurium, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida albicans using microdilution method in 96 multiwell microtiter plates. All the extracts from the different parts of the plant showed antimicrobial activity against most tested microorganisms. The most active extract against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria was ethanol extract from the fruits with a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) value of 0.15 mg/ml against B. subtilis, B. cereus, P. vulgaris and C. diphtheriae. In addition, the same extract from the same plant part demonstrated the strongest antifungal activity against C. albicans with an MIC value of 0.15 mg/ml.
Keywords: Antimicrobial activity, Tribulus terrestris, Urinary tract infections
INTRODUCTION
Traditional medicine has been practiced for many centuries by a substantial proportion of the population of Iraq. The interest in the study of medicinal plants as a source of pharmacologically active compounds has increased worldwide. It is recognized that in some developing countries, plants are the main medicinal source to treat infectious diseases. Plant extracts represent a continuous effort to find new compounds with the potential to act against multi-resistant bacteria. Approximately 20% of the plants found in the world have been submitted to pharmacological or biological test, and a substantial number of new antibiotics introduced on the market are obtained from natural or semi-synthetic resources (Mothana and Lindequist, 2005).
Tribulus terrestris (Puncture Vine, Caltrop, Yellow Vine and Goathead) is a flowering plant of the Zygophyllaceae family, native to warm temperature and tropical regions of the old world in Southern Europe, Southern Asia, Africa and Northern Australia. It can thrive even in desert climates and poor soil (Abeywickrama and Bean, 1991). In Iraq T. terrestris is used in folk medicine as tonic, aphrodisiac, analgesic, astringent, stomachic, anti-hypertensive, diuretic, lithon-triptic and urinary anti-infectives (Majeed and Mahmood, 1988; Saad Aldein, 1986).
Different parts of Turkish and Iranian T. terrestris have been reported to have antibacterial activity (Abbasoglu and Tosun, 1994; Kianbakht and Jahaniani, 2003); however, the antimicrobial activity of Iraqi T. terrestris has not been studied. In the current study, we evaluated in vitro antimicrobial activity of different parts of T. terrestris growing in Iraq using different extracts.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plant materials
Fruits, leaves and roots of T. terrestris used in this study were collected at the end of November 2006 from Mosul countryside, Nineveh Province, Iraq, with assistance of local traditional healers, and authenticated by Dr. Abdulazeez Shekho, Department of Biology, University of Mosul, Iraq. Voucher specimen of the plant (No. 62) was dried and deposited at the herbarium of Department of Biology, University of Mosul, Iraq.
Preparation of the extracts
1. Aqueous extracts
The air dried fine powdered plant fruits, leaves and roots (100 g) were infused in distilled water until complete exhaustion. The extract was then filtered using Whatman No. 1 filter paper and the filtrate was evaporated in vacuo and dried using either a rotary evaporator at 60 °C or a freeze drier (Kandil et al., 1994). The final dried samples were stored in labeled sterile bottles and kept at −20 °C.
2. Ethanol extracts
Ethanol extracts were accomplished according to established protocols (le Grand et al., 1988). Each dried plant sample was ground and extracted in a percolator with 95% ethanol. About 10 ml of ethanol per gram of plant sample was used. The ethanol extract was dried under a reduced pressure at 40 °C. The dried extract was stored in sterile bottles until further use.
3. Chloroform extracts
Powdered samples (100 g) from each plant part were extracted with chloroform using a soxhlet extractor for continuously 10 h or until the used solvent turned pure and colorless (Chhabra et al., 1982). The solvent was removed using a rotary vacuum evaporator at 40 °C to give a concentrated extract, which was then frozen and freeze-dried until use.
Microbial cultures
Ten strains of bacteria and one yeast were used as test microorganisms. The bacterial strains included Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus cereus and Corynebacterium diphtheriae; Gram-negative Escherichia coli, Proteus vulgaris, Serratia marcescens, Salmonella typhimurium, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa; and the yeast Candida albicans. All microorganisms were clinical isolates, obtained from the Microbiology Laboratory at Department of Biology, University of Mosul, Iraq, and very carefully identified using standard microbiological methods.
Inoculum preparation
Mueller-Hinton broth and Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) were applied for growing and diluting the microorganism suspensions. Bacterial strains were grown to exponential phase in Mueller-Hinton broth at 37 °C for 18 h and adjusted to a final density of 108 CFU/ml by diluting fresh cultures and comparing with McFarland density. C. albicans was aseptically inoculated on Petri dishes containing autoclaved, cooled and settled SDA medium. The Petri dishes were incubated at 31 °C for 48 h to give white round colonies against a yellowish background. These were aseptically subcultured on SDA slants. The yeast colonies from SDA slants were suspended in sterilized 0.9% sodium chloride solution (normal saline), which was compared with McFarland solution. One ml yeast suspension in normal saline was added to 74 ml of sterile medium, kept at 45 °C, to give concentration of 2×107 cells/ml (according to the manufacturer’s instructions).
Antimicrobial activity
Extracts were tested against the strains for their inhibitory activity, using a common broth microdilution method in 96 multiwell microtiter plates, in duplicate, as reported by Koneman (1995) and recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standard (NCCLS, 2001).
For susceptibility testing, 50 µl of Mueller-Hinton broth was distributed from the second to the twelfth test tubes. Dry extracts from each plant part were initially dissolved in 100 µl of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and then in Mueller-Hinton broth, to reach a final concentration of 10 mg/ml; 100 µl of these suspensions were added to the first test well of each microtiter line, and then 50 µl of scalar dilutions were transferred from the second to the ninth well. The 10th well was considered as growth control, since no extracts solutions were added. Then, 50 µl of the bacterial suspensions were added to each well. The final concentrations of the extracts adopted to evaluate the antibacterial activity were 0.01 to 5.00 mg/ml. Plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. Maxipime (Hemofarm) at the concentration range of 0.01~5.00 mg/ml was prepared in Mueller-Hinton broth and used as standard drug for positive control. As an indicator of bacterial growth, 40 µl p-iodonitrotetrazolium (INT) violet dissolved in water was added to the wells and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min (Buwa and van Staden, 2006). The lowest concentration of each extract showing no growth was taken as its minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and confirmed by plating 5 µl samples from clear wells on Mueller-Hinton agar medium. The colorless tetrazolium salt acts as an electron acceptor and is reduced to a red-colored formazan product by biologically active organisms (Eloff, 1998). Where bacterial growth was inhibited, the solution in the well remained clear after incubation with INT.
As for C. albicans a simple turbidity test was used to determine the MIC values of T. terrestris extracts by adding 0.1 ml of each extract (0.01~5.00 mg/ml) from each plant part into tubes containing 9.8 ml sterile Mueller-Hinton broth, and tubes were then inoculated with 0.1 ml of yeast suspension and incubated at 31 °C for 48 h. Amphotericin B (0.01~5.00 mg/ml) was used as positive control. The optical density was determined using a Spectro SC spectrophotometer (LaboMed Inc., USA) at 630 nm. The MIC values were taken as the lowest concentration of the extracts that showed no growth after 48 h of incubation by comparing with the control tube that included 9.8 ml Mueller-Hinton broth and 0.1 ml of yeast suspension in addition to 0.1 ml of each extract in different concentration (un-incubated).
RESULTS
Three different extracts from fruits, leaves and roots of Iraqi T. terrestris were tested at various concentrations (0.01~5.00 mg/ml), and the evaluated MIC values are reported in Table 1. All the plant parts showed antibacterial activity against most tested bacteria. Aqueous extract from T. terrestris fruits showed good activity against the tested bacteria and the strongest activity was seen against C. diphtheriae (MIC=0.62 mg/ml), which was similar to what was achieved by the standard drug Maxipime; meanwhile, S. typhimurium was inhibited using the highest extract concentration (MIC=5.00 mg/ml). In addition, S. marcescens and P. aeruginosa resisted all aqueous extracts of various concentrations. Ethanol and chloroform extracts of T. terrestris fruits demonstrated very close activities against all reference bacteria. Very strong activity was seen against S. aureus, B. subtilis, B. cereus, C. diphtheriae, E. coli and P. vulgaris using both extracts. The highest antibacterial activity was seen against B. subtilis, B. cereus, C. diphtheriae and P. vulgaris in the ethanol extract (MIC=0.15 mg/ml), while B. subtilis, B. cereus and C. diphtheriae were the most sensitive bacteria to the chloroform extract (MIC=0.31 mg/ml). S. marcescens, S. typhimurium, K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa were inhibited by high concentrations of ethanol and chloroform extracts (MIC=2.50 and 1.25 mg/ml).
Table 1.
Microorganisms |
MIC (mg/ml) |
||||||||||
Fruits |
Leaves |
Roots |
Control |
||||||||
A | E | C | A | E | C | A | E | C | M | AB | |
Gram-positive | |||||||||||
S. aureus | 2.50 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 2.50 | 1.25 | 2.50 | >5.00 | 0.62 | 0.31 | 0.07 | NT |
B. subtilis | 1.25 | 0.15 | 0.31 | 1.25 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 2.50 | 0.62 | 0.31 | 0.01 | NT |
B. cereus | 1.25 | 0.15 | 0.31 | 2.50 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 5.00 | 1.25 | 0.62 | 0.03 | NT |
C. diphtheriae | 0.62 | 0.15 | 0.31 | 1.25 | 0.62 | 1.25 | 2.50 | 1.25 | 0.62 | 0.62 | NT |
Gram-negative | |||||||||||
P. vulgaris | >5.00 | 0.15 | 1.25 | 2.50 | 0.31 | 1.25 | >5.00 | 2.50 | 1.25 | 0.15 | NT |
E. coli | 1.25 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 2.50 | 0.62 | 1.25 | >5.00 | 2.50 | 1.25 | 0.15 | NT |
S. marcescens | >5.00 | 2.50 | 2.50 | >5.00 | 5.00 | >5.00 | >5.00 | >5.00 | >5.00 | 2.50 | NT |
S. typhimurium | 5.00 | 1.25 | 2.50 | >5.00 | 1.25 | 5.00 | >5.00 | >5.00 | 2.50 | 2.50 | NT |
K. pneumoniae | 2.50 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 2.50 | 0.31 | 2.50 | >5.00 | 2.50 | 1.25 | 1.25 | NT |
P. aeruginosa | >5.00 | 1.25 | 2.50 | >5.00 | 1.25 | 2.50 | 5.00 | 2.50 | 1.25 | 2.50 | NT |
Yeast | |||||||||||
C. albicans | >5.00 | 0.62 | 2.50 | >5.00 | 1.25 | 2.50 | >5.00 | 5.00 | 2.50 | NT | 0.15 |
A: Aqueous extract; E: Ethanol extract; C: Chloroform extract; M: Maxipime; AB: Amphotericin B; NT: Not tested
Aqueous extract from T. terrestris leaves revealed close results to the fruit extract, except it was active against P. vulgaris with an MIC value of 2.50 mg/ml and resisted by S. typhimurium, S. marcescens and P. aeruginosa. Ethanol and chloroform extracts from leaves also possessed promising results against the tested bacteria with less action compared with fruit ethanol and chloroform extracts. The best MIC values were calculated against B. subtilis, P. vulgaris and K. pneumoniae (MIC=0.31 mg/ml) using the ethanol extract and B. subtilis (MIC=0.31 mg/ml) using chloroform extract. S. marcescens resisted the chloroform extract and was inhibited by the highest ethanol extract concentration.
The different extracts from T. terrestris roots exhibited from moderate to no activity against tested bacteria. The weakest extract from the roots was the aqueous extract, which was only active against B. subtilis, B. cereus, C. diphtheriae and P. aeruginosa using high concentrations (MIC=5.00 and 2.50 mg/ml). Chloroform extract showed high antibacterial activity against some of the tested bacteria, with all the calculated MIC values greater than those of ethanol extract from the same plant part. The standard drug Maxipime showed a greater antibacterial activity than that of most used plant extracts, and the strongest action was seen against B. subtilis (MIC=0.01 mg/ml).
Regarding antifungal activity, all aqueous extracts from different parts of T. terrestris were resisted by C. albicans. The strongest antifungal activity was observed using the ethanol extract from T. terrestris fruits with an MIC value of 0.62 mg/ml. The standard drug Amphotericin B achieved the highest antifungal activity against C. albicans (MIC=0.15 mg/ml).
DISCUSSION
All the extracts were able to inhibit the growth of one or more of the tested microorganisms. The Gram-positive bacteria B. subtilis, B. cereus and C. diphtheriae were the most sensitive strains to the ethanol extract of T. terrestris fruits (MIC=0.15 mg/ml), while the strongest activity was demonstrated against the Gram-negative bacterium P. vulgaris (MIC=0.15 mg/ml) using the same extract.
The activity of the plant against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria may be indicative to the presence of broad spectrum antibiotic compounds or simply general metabolic toxins in the plant, in addition to the plant (fruits, leaves and root) content of pharmacological active metabolites like furostanol and spirostanol saponins (Kostova and Dinchev, 2005), flavonoid glycosides (Saleh et al., 1982), phytosterols and some amides (Xu et al., 2000). The plant also contains a mixture of B-carboline alkaloids: harmane, norharmane, tetrahydroharmane, harmine, harmaline, harmol, harmalol, ruin and dihydroruin (Bourke et al., 1990).
Saponins have been reported to possess a wide range of biological activities. The toxicity of saponins to insects (insecticidal activity), parasite worms (anthelmintic activity), molluscs (molluscicidal), and fish (piscidal activity), and their antifungal, antiviral, and antibacterial activities are well documented (Lacaille-Dubois and Wagner, 1996; Milgate and Roberts, 1995). The mode of action of antibacterial effects of saponins seems to involve membranolytic properties, rather than simply altering the surface tension of the extracellular medium, thus being influenced by microbial population density (Killeen et al., 1998).
Flavonoids are phenolic structures containing one carbonyl group. Since they are known to be synthesized by plants in response to microbial infection (Dixon et al., 1983), it should not be surprising that they have been found in vitro to be effective antimicrobial substances against a wide array of microorganisms. Their activity is probably due to their ability to complex with extracellular and soluble proteins and to complex with bacterial cell walls (Cowan, 1999). More lipophilic flavonoids may also disrupt microbial membranes (Tsuchiya et al., 1996).
Alkaloids isolated from plant are commonly found to have antimicrobial properties (Omulokoli et al., 1997). Alkaloids may be useful against HIV infection (Sethi, 1979) as well as intestinal infections associated with AIDS (McDevitt et al., 1996). Berberine and harmane are important representatives of the alkaloid group. The mechanism of action of highly aromatic planar quaternary alkaloids such as berberine and harmane is attributed to their ability to intercalate with DNA (Phillipson and O′Neill, 1987).
The best MIC values against most bacteria were seen in the ethanol extract from the plant fruits followed by leaf extracts and finally root extracts which were resisted by most of the Gram-negative bacteria specially S. marcescens.
Candida albicans remains the most common infection-causing fungus; about 45% of clinical fungal infections are caused by C. albicans (Gupta et al., 2004). The present study shows that ethanol extract from T. terrestris fruits had potent anti-C. albicans activity with an MIC value of 0.62 mg/ml. The antifungal activity of T. terrestris may be attributed to various chemicals detectable in its extracts such as saponins (Zhang et al., 2006). The action mechanisms of saponins may lie in damage to the membrane and leakage of cellular materials, ultimately leading to cell death (Mshvildadze et al., 2000).
All parts (fruits, stems plus leaves and roots) of Turkish and Iranian T. terrestris showed antibacterial activity against Enterococcus faecalis, S. aureus, E. coli and P. aeruginosa (Abbasoglu and Tosun, 1994; Kianbakht and Jahaniani, 2003) in contrast to aerial parts of Yemeni T. terrestris which had no detectable antibacterial activity against these bacteria (Awadh-Ali et al., 2001), and only fruits and leaves of Indian T. terrestris were active exclusively against E. coli and S. aureus (Williamson, 2002). It can be argued that antibacterial activity of Iraqi T. terrestris is similar to Turkish and Iranian T. terrestris. Different results concerning the antibacterial activity of T. terrestris might be due to different geographic sources of the plant used, different types of strains used, and different assay methods.
CONCLUSION
Since Iraqi T. terrestris demonstrated activity against the most prevalent Gram-negative bacteria in urinary infections, namely E. coli, the use of the plant as a urinary anti-infective is validated, scientifically supported by the results obtained in this work.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Dr. Abdulazeez Shekho for the identification of plant species. We also thank all the staff of Microbiology Laboratory in Department of Biology, College of Education, University of Mosul, Iraq for making this study possible.
References
- 1.Abbasoglu U, Tosun F. Antimicrobial activity of Tribulus terrestris L. growing in Turkey. Hacettepe Universitesi Eczacilik Fakultesi Dergisi. 1994;14:81–85. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Abeywickrama K, Bean GA. Toxigenic Aspergillus flavus and aflatoxins in Sri Lankan medicinal plant material. Mycopa-thologia. 1991;113:187–190. doi: 10.1007/BF00436129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Awadh-Ali NA, Jülich WD, Kusnick C, Lindequist U. Screening of Yemeni medicinal plants for antibacterial and cytotoxic activities. J Ethnopharmacol. 2001;74(2):173–179. doi: 10.1016/S03788741(00)00364-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bourke CA, Carrigan MJ, Dixon RJ. Upper motor neuron effects in sheep of some betacarotine alkaloids identified in Zygophyllaceous plants. Aust Vet J. 1990;67:248–251. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1990.tb07778.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Buwa LV, van Staden J. Antibacterial and antifungal activity of traditional medicinal plants used against venereal diseases. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006;103(1):139–142. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2005.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chhabra SC, Shao JF, Mshiu EN. Antifungal activity among traditionally used herbs in Tanzania. The Dar Medicinal Journal. 1982;9:68–73. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cowan M. Plant products as antimicrobial agents. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999;12(4):564–582. doi: 10.1128/cmr.12.4.564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dixon R, Dey P, Lamb C. Phytoalexins: Enzymology and molecular biology. Adv Enzymol. 1983;55:1–69. doi: 10.1002/9780470123010.ch1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Eloff JN. A sensitive and quick microplate method to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration of plant extracts for bacteria. Planta Medica. 1998;64(8):711–713. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-957563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gupta N, Haque A, Lattif A, Narayan R, Mukhopadhyay G, Prasad R. Epidemiology and molecular typing of Candida isolates from burn patients. Mycopathologia. 2004;158(4):397–405. doi: 10.1007/s11046004-1820-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kandil O, Radwan NM, Hassan AB, Amer AM, El-Banna HA. Extracts and fractions of Thymus capitatus exhibit antimicrobial activities. J Ethnopharmacol. 1994;44(1):19–24. doi: 10.1016/03788741(94)90094-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kianbakht S, Jahaniani F. Evaluation of antibacterial activity of Tribulus terrestris L. growing in Iran. Iranian J Pharmacol Ther. 2003;2:22–24. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Killeen G, Madigan C, Connolly C, Walsh G, Clark C, Hynes M, Timmins B, James P, Headon D, Power R. Antimicrobial saponins of Yucca schidigera and the implications of their in vitro properties for their in vivo impact. J Agric Food Chem. 1998;46(8):3178–3186. doi: 10.1021/jf970928j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Koneman EW. Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology. 2nd Ed. Roma: A. Delfino; 1995. pp. 550–605. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kostova I, Dinchev D. Saponins in Tribulus terrestris—chemistry and bioactivity. Phytochem Rev. 2005;4(2-3):111–137. doi: 10.1007/s11101-005-2833-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lacaille-Dubois M, Wagner H. A review of the biological and pharmacological activities of saponins. Phytomedicine. 1996;2(4):363–386. doi: 10.1016/S0944-7113(96)80081-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.le Grand A, Wondergem PA, Verpoorte R, Pousset JL. Anti-infectious phytotherapies of the tree-savannah of Senegal (West-Africa) II. Antimicrobial activity of 33 species. J Ethnopharmacol. 1988;22(1):25–31. doi: 10.1016/0378-8741(88)90227-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Majeed SH, Mahmood MJ. Herbs and Medicinal Plants in Iraq between Traditional Medicine and Scientific Research. 1st Ed. Baghdad: Dar Al-Thaowra for Publishing; 1988. p. 40. (in Arabic) [Google Scholar]
- 19.McDevitt J, Schneider D, Katiyar S, et al. Program and Abstracts of the 36th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1996. Berberine: A Candidate for the Treatment of Diarrhea in AIDS Patients. Abstr. 175. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Milgate J, Roberts D. The nutritional and biological significance of saponins. Nutr Res. 1995;15(8):1223–1249. doi: 10.1016/0271-5317(95)00081-S. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mothana RA, Lindequist U. Antimicrobial activity of some medicinal plants of the island Soqotra. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005;96(1-2):177–181. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2004.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mshvildadze V, Favel A, Delmas F, Elias R, Faure R, Decanosidze Q, Kemertelidze E, Balansard G. Antifungal and antiprotozoal activities of saponins from Hedera colchica . Pharmazie. 2000;55(4):325–326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.NCCLS (National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards) Performance Standards for Anti-Microbial Susceptibility Testing: Eleventh Informational Supplement. Wayne, PA, USA: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standard; 2001. NCCLS, Document M100-S11. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Omulokoli E, Khan B, Chhabra S. Antiplasmodial activity of four Kenyan medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol. 1997;56(2):133–137. doi: 10.1016/S03788741(97)01521-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Phillipson J, O′Neill M. New leads to the treatment of protozoal infections based on natural product molecules. Acta Pharm Nord. 1987;1:131–144. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Saad Aldein SM. Medicinal Herbs. 1st Ed. Baghdad: Dar Al-Shoun Al-Thaqafia Al-Aama for Publishing; 1986. p. 70. (in Arabic) [Google Scholar]
- 27.Saleh NA, Ahmed AA, Abdalla MF. Flavonoid glycosides of Tribulus pentandrus and T . terrestris Phytochemistry. 1982;21(8):1995–2000. doi: 10.1016/00319422(82)83030-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sethi M. Inhibition of reverse transcriptase activity by benzophenanthridine alkaloids. J Nat Prod. 1979;42(2):187–196. doi: 10.1021/np50002a010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tsuchiya H, Sato M, Miyazaki T, Fujiwara S, Tanigaki S, Ohyama M, Tanaka T, Iinuma M. Comparative study on the antibacterial activity of phytochemical flavanones against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . J Ethnopharmacol. 1996;50(1):27–34. doi: 10.1016/0378-8741(96)85514-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Williamson EM. Major Herbs of Ayurveda. China: Churchill-Livingstone; 2002. p. 312. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Xu YX, Chen HS, Liang HQ, Gu ZB, Lui WY, Leung WN, Li TJ. Three new saponins from Tribulus terrestris . Planta Med. 2000;66(6):545–550. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-8609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhang JD, Xu Z, Cao YB, Chen HS, Yan L, An MM, Gao PH, Wang Y, Jia XM, Jiang YX. Antifungal activities and action mechanisms of compounds from Tribulus terrestris L. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006;103(1):76–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2005.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]