Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1966 Sep 1;50(1):25–41. doi: 10.1085/jgp.50.1.25

The Spatiotemporal Analysis of Odorants at the Level of the Olfactory Receptor Sheet

Maxwell Mark Mozell 1
PMCID: PMC2225636  PMID: 5971031

Abstract

Activity in two separate regions of the frog olfactory mucosa was sampled by simultaneously recording the summated neural discharges from the olfactory nerve branches originating from them. The difference in the activity from these two regions in response to a stimulus was measured by: (a) the ratio of the response amplitude recorded from the lateral nerve branch to that recorded from the medial nerve branch (LB/MB ratio), (b) the latency difference (or time interval) between these two responses. Equal concentrations of four different odorants were drawn into the nose by an artificially produced sniff of known dimensions. At each concentration in every animal the four chemicals were ranked in order of the magnitudes of their LB/MB ratios and again in order of their latency differences. Regardless of their concentration, the same chemicals fell into the same ranks in different animals. In addition, for each chemical the magnitudes of the ratios and latency differences showed only minimal changes with concentration. Thus, spatiotemporal patterns of relative response magnitudes and latency differences across the mucosa differentially represented the odorants. Such a spatiotemporal code, together with physicochemical considerations, suggested that the nose separates vapors in a manner similar to a gas chromatograph. This is further supported by the previously observed reversal of the ratio patterns with reversal of air flow direction through the olfactory sac.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (953.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ADRIAN E. D. The basis of sensation; some recent studies of olfaction. Br Med J. 1954 Feb 6;1(4857):287–290. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.4857.287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BEIDLER L. M. Properties of chemoreceptors of tongue of rat. J Neurophysiol. 1953 Nov;16(6):595–607. doi: 10.1152/jn.1953.16.6.595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. FULLER G. H., STELTENKAMP R., TISSERAND G. A. THE GAS CHROMATOGRAPH WITH HUMAN SENSOR: PERFUMER MODEL. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1964 Jul 30;116:711–724. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1964.tb45106.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. MOZELL M. M. EVIDENCE FOR SORPTION AS A MECHANISM OF THE OLFACTORY ANALYSIS OF VAPOURS. Nature. 1964 Sep 12;203:1181–1182. doi: 10.1038/2031181a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. MOZELL M. M. Electrophysiology of olfactory bulb. J Neurophysiol. 1958 Mar;21(2):183–196. doi: 10.1152/jn.1958.21.2.183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. MOZELL M. M. OLFACTORY DISCRIMINATION: ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL SPATIOTEMPORAL BASIS. Science. 1964 Mar 20;143(3612):1336–1337. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. MOZELL M. M. Olfactory mucosal and neural responses in the frog. Am J Physiol. 1962 Aug;203:353–358. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1962.203.2.353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES