Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1966 Nov 1;50(2):351–357. doi: 10.1085/jgp.50.2.351

Stimulation of the Salt Receptor of the Blowfly

II. Temperature

Howard L Gillary 1
PMCID: PMC2225648  PMID: 11526833

Abstract

The response of the salt receptor of the blowfly increased with increasing ambient temperature. At constant ambient temperature, the response increased as the relative humidity was raised. At low relative humidity, the temperature of the stimulating solution near its air interface was markedly below ambient temperature, due to evaporation. Warming and cooling the tip of the sensillum while recording from its side respectively raised and lowered the frequency of "spontaneous" action potentials of the receptor. The results indicate that the response of the salt receptor is dependent on the temperature of the stimulus. The Q10 is probably several times greater than one.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (456.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. EVANS D. R., MELLON D., Jr Electrophysiological studies of a water receptor associated with the taste sensilla of the blow-fly. J Gen Physiol. 1962 Jan;45:487–500. doi: 10.1085/jgp.45.3.487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. EVANS D. R., MELLON D., Jr Stimulation of a primary taste receptor by salts. J Gen Physiol. 1962 Mar;45:651–661. doi: 10.1085/jgp.45.4.651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gillary H. L. Stimulation of the salt receptor of the blowfly. I. NaCl. J Gen Physiol. 1966 Nov;50(2):337–350. doi: 10.1085/jgp.50.2.337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HODGSON E. S., LETTVIN J. Y., ROEDER K. D. Physiology of a primary chemoreceptor unit. Science. 1955 Sep 2;122(3166):417–418. doi: 10.1126/science.122.3166.417-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HODGSON E. S., ROEDER K. D. Electrophysiological studies of arthropod chemoreception. I. General properties of the labellar chemoreceptors of Diptera. J Cell Physiol. 1956 Aug;48(1):51–75. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1030480104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. ISHIKO N., LOEWENSTEIN W. R. Effects of temperature on the generator and action potentials of a sense organ. J Gen Physiol. 1961 Sep;45:105–124. doi: 10.1085/jgp.45.1.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. WOLBARSHT M. L., DETHIER V. G. Electrical activity in the chemoreceptors of the blowfly. I. Responses to chemical and mechanical stimulation. J Gen Physiol. 1958 Nov 20;42(2):393–412. doi: 10.1085/jgp.42.2.393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES