Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1967 May 1;50(5):1429–1458. doi: 10.1085/jgp.50.5.1429

The Subcellular Origin of Bioluminescence in Noctiluca miliaris

Roger Eckert 1, George T Reynolds 1
PMCID: PMC2225713  PMID: 5340466

Abstract

The light emitted by Noctiluca has its origin in 1 to 5 x 104 organelles ("microsources") which are scattered throughout the perivacuolar cytoplasm, and which appear to be the elementary functional units of bioluminescence. Microscopical techniques, image intensification, and microphotometry were employed in their investigation. Microsources are fluorescent, strongly phase-retarding, and range widely in diameter below 1.5 microns. The number of quanta emitted in a flash from a microsource ("microflash") is of the order of 105 photons. However, microflashes show a wide range of intensities, which are correlated with the size of the organelles from which they arise. Each organelle responds repetitively and with reproducible time course to a succession of invading triggering potentials. Reversible changes in the intensity of the flash emitted by the whole cell ("macroflash") occur because of graduations in intensity of microflashes rather than as a result of changes in the number of responsive organelles. The shape of the flash emitted by individual microsources resembles that of the macroflash except for slightly shorter rise and decay times. It is concluded that the macroflash results from somewhat asynchronous, but otherwise parallel summation of microflashes.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. DESA R., HASTINGS J. W., VATTER A. E. LUMINESCENT "CRYSTALLINE" PARTICLES: AN ORGANIZED SUBCELLULAR BIOLUMINESCENT SYSTEM. Science. 1963 Sep 27;141(3587):1269–1270. doi: 10.1126/science.141.3587.1269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Eckert R. I. Specific Nature of Triggering Events. Science. 1965 Mar 5;147(3662):1140–1142. doi: 10.1126/science.147.3662.1140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. STREHLER B. L., McELROY W. D. Purification of firefly luciferin. J Cell Physiol. 1949 Dec;34(3):457–466. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1030340310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sandow A., Taylor S. R., Preiser H. Role of the action potential in excitation-contraction coupling. Fed Proc. 1965 Sep-Oct;24(5):1116–1123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. WEBER A., HERZ R., REISS I. THE REGULATION OF MYOFIBRILLAR ACTIVITY BY CALCIUM. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1964 Oct 27;160:489–501. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1964.0063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES