Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1967 Sep 1;50(8):2061–2083. doi: 10.1085/jgp.50.8.2061

Standing-Gradient Osmotic Flow

A mechanism for coupling of water and solute transport in epithelia

Jared M Diamond 1, William H Bossert 1
PMCID: PMC2225765  PMID: 6066064

Abstract

At the ultrastructural level, epithelia performing solute-linked water transport possess long, narrow channels open at one end and closed at the other, which may constitute the fluid transport route (e.g., lateral intercellular spaces, basal infoldings, intracellular canaliculi, and brush-border microvilli). Active solute transport into such folded structures would establish standing osmotic gradients, causing a progressive approach to osmotic equilibrium along the channel's length. The behavior of a simple standing-gradient flow system has therefore been analyzed mathematically because of its potential physiological significance. The osmolarity of the fluid emerging from the channel's open end depends upon five parameters: channel length, radius, and water permeability, and solute transport rate and diffusion coefficient. For ranges of values of these parameters encountered experimentally in epithelia, the emergent osmolarity is found by calculation to range from isotonic to a few times isotonic; i.e., the range encountered in epithelial absorbates and secretions. The transported fluid becomes more isotonic as channel radius or solute diffusion coefficient is decreased, or as channel length or water permeability is increased. Given appropriate parameters, a standing-gradient system can yield hypertonic fluids whose osmolarities are virtually independent of transport rate over a wide range, as in distal tubule and avian salt gland. The results suggest that water-to-solute coupling in epithelia is due to the ultrastructural geometry of the transport route.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AURICCHIO G., BARANY E. H. On the role of osmotic water transport in the secretion of the aqueous humour. Acta Physiol Scand. 1959 Mar 31;45:190–210. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1959.tb01690.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. CURRAN P. F., MACINTOSH J. R. A model system for biological water transport. Nature. 1962 Jan 27;193:347–348. doi: 10.1038/193347a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DIAMOND J. M. THE MECHANISM OF ISOTONIC WATER TRANSPORT. J Gen Physiol. 1964 Sep;48:15–42. doi: 10.1085/jgp.48.1.15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DIAMOND J. M. The mechanism of water transport by the gall-bladder. J Physiol. 1962 May;161:503–527. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DURBIN R. P., FRANK H., SOLOMON A. K. Water flow through frog gastric mucosa. J Gen Physiol. 1956 Mar 20;39(4):535–551. doi: 10.1085/jgp.39.4.535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Davis L. E., Schmidt-Nielsen B. Ultrastructure of the crocodile kidney (Crocodylus acutus) with special reference to electrolyte and fluid transport. J Morphol. 1967 Apr;121(4):255–276. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051210402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kaye G. I., Wheeler H. O., Whitlock R. T., Lane N. Fluid transport in the rabbit gallbladder. A combined physiological and electron microscopic study. J Cell Biol. 1966 Aug;30(2):237–268. doi: 10.1083/jcb.30.2.237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Patlak C. S., Goldstein D. A., Hoffman J. F. The flow of solute and solvent across a two-membrane system. J Theor Biol. 1963 Nov;5(3):426–442. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(63)90088-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Roberts J. S., Schmidt-Nielsen B. Renal ultrastructure and excretion of salt and water by three terrestrial lizards. Am J Physiol. 1966 Aug;211(2):476–486. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1966.211.2.476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. SCHMIDT-NIELSEN K. The salt-secreting gland of marine birds. Circulation. 1960 May;21:955–967. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.21.5.955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Smyth D. H., Wright E. M. Streaming potentials in the rat small intestine. J Physiol. 1966 Feb;182(3):591–602. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Tormey J. M., Diamond J. M. The ultrastructural route of fluid transport in rabbit gall bladder. J Gen Physiol. 1967 Sep;50(8):2031–2060. doi: 10.1085/jgp.50.8.2031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. WHITLOCK R. T., WHEELER H. O. COUPLED TRANSPORT OF SOLUTE AND WATER ACROSS RABBIT GALLBLADDER EPITHELIUM. J Clin Invest. 1964 Dec;43:2249–2265. doi: 10.1172/JCI105099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. WHITTEMBURY G., OKEN D. E., WINDHAGER E. E., SOLOMON A. K. Single proximal tubules of Necturus kidney. IV. Dependence of H20 movement on osmotic gradients. Am J Physiol. 1959 Nov;197:1121–1127. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1959.197.5.1121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES