Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1968 Sep 1;52(3):389–407. doi: 10.1085/jgp.52.3.389

Strophanthidin-Sensitive Components of Potassium and Sodium Movements in Skeletal Muscle As Influenced by the Internal Sodium Concentration

R A Sjodin 1, L A Beaugé 1
PMCID: PMC2225818  PMID: 5673300

Abstract

"Low sodium" muscles were prepared which contained around 5 mmoles/kg fiber of intracellular sodium. "High sodium" muscles containing between 15 and 30 mmoles/kg fiber of intracellular sodium were also prepared. In low sodium muscles application of 10-5 M strophanthidin reduced potassium influx by about 5%. Potassium efflux was unaffected by strophanthidin under these conditions. In high sodium muscles, 10-5 M strophanthidin reduced potassium influx by 45% and increased potassium efflux by 70%, on the average. In low sodium muscles sodium efflux was reduced by 25% during application of 10-5 M strophanthidin while in high sodium muscles similarly treated, sodium efflux was reduced by about 60%. Low sodium muscles showed a large reduction in sodium efflux when sodium ions in the Ringer solution were replaced by lithium ions. The average reduction in sodium efflux was 4.5-fold. Of the amount of sodium efflux remaining in lithium. Ringer's solution, 40% could be inhibited by application of 10-5 M strophanthidin. The total sodium efflux from low sodium muscles exposed to Ringer's solution in which lithium had been substituted for sodium ions for a period of 1 hr can be fractionated as 78% Na-for-Na interchange, 10% strophanthidin-sensitive sodium pump, and 12% residual sodium efflux. It is concluded that large strophanthidin-sensitive components of sodium and potassium flux can be expected only at elevated sodium concentrations within the muscle cells.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adrian R. H., Slayman C. L. Membrane potential and conductance during transport of sodium, potassium and rubidium in frog muscle. J Physiol. 1966 Jun;184(4):970–1014. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. EDWARDS C., HARRIS E. J. Factors influencing the sodium movement in frog muscle with a discussion of the mechanism of sodium movement. J Physiol. 1957 Mar 11;135(3):567–580. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. HOROWICZ P., GERBER C. J. EFFECTS OF EXTERNAL POTASSIUM AND STROPHANTHIDIN ON SODIUM FLUXES IN FROG STRIATED MUSCLE. J Gen Physiol. 1965 Jan;48:489–514. doi: 10.1085/jgp.48.3.489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. JOHNSON J. A. Influence of ouabain, strophanthidin and dihydrostrophanthidin on sodium and potassium transport in frog sartorii. Am J Physiol. 1956 Nov;187(2):328–332. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1956.187.2.328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. KEYNES R. D., MAISEL G. W. The energy requirement for sodium extrusion from a frog muscle. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1954 May 27;142(908):383–392. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1954.0031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. KEYNES R. D., SWAN R. C. The effect of external sodium concentration on the sodium fluxes in frog skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1959 Oct;147:591–625. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. MULLINS L. J., AWAD M. Z. THE CONTROL OF THE MEMBRANE POTENTIAL OF MUSCLE FIBERS BY THE SODIUM PUMP. J Gen Physiol. 1965 May;48:761–775. doi: 10.1085/jgp.48.5.761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. SJODIN R. A. THE POTASSIUM FLUX RATIO IN SKELETAL MUSCLE AS A TEST FOR INDEPENDENT ION MOVEMENT. J Gen Physiol. 1965 May;48:777–795. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES