Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1968 Nov 1;52(5):717–737. doi: 10.1085/jgp.52.5.717

The Luminosity Curve of the Protanomalous Fovea

Mathew Alpern 1,2, Shuko Torii 1,2
PMCID: PMC2225843  PMID: 5303228

Abstract

Threshold spectral sensitivities (in the dark, or against bright colored backgrounds) are identical in the red-green range for both protanopes (dichromats) and protanomalous trichromatic color defectives. The latter, however, must have an additional photolabile cone pigment in the red-green range, and its presence is revealed by heterochromatic brightness matching through the spectrum (i.e. luminosity curves). The absorption spectrum of the anomalous cone pigment can be inferred from the protanomalous and protanopic luminosity curve, given reasonable assumptions as to how the different cone mechanisms pool their responses. Depending upon these assumptions, the pigment inferred is either (a) dilute solution of the normal red pigment (assumed density 1.0 for the deuteranope) or (b) similar in its absorption spectrum to the normal green pigment but shifted slightly toward the long wave end of the spectrum. Experimental attempts to choose between these alternatives have so far proved equivocal though (b) seems more likely on the basis of indirect evidence.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ALPERN M., CAMPBELL F. W. The spectral sensitivity of the consensual light reflex. J Physiol. 1962 Dec;164:478–507. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp007033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alpern M., Torii S. The luminosity curve of the deuteranomalous fovea. J Gen Physiol. 1968 Nov;52(5):738–749. doi: 10.1085/jgp.52.5.738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BRINDLEY G. S., WILLMER E. N. The reflexion of light from the macular and peripheral fundus oculi in man. J Physiol. 1952 Mar;116(3):350–356. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker H. D. Single-variable anomaloscope matches during recovery from artificial red blindness. J Opt Soc Am. 1966 May;56(5):686–689. doi: 10.1364/josa.56.000686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DONNER K. O., RUSHTON W. A. Rod-cone interaction in the frog's retina analysed by the Stiles-Crawford effect and by dark adaptation. J Physiol. 1959 Dec;149:303–317. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. GRAHAM C. H., HSIA Y. Color defect and color theory; studies of normal and colorblind persons, including a subject color-blind in one eye but not in the other. Science. 1958 Mar 28;127(3300):675–682. doi: 10.1126/science.127.3300.675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. RUSHTON W. A. A CONE PIGMENT IN THE PROTANOPE. J Physiol. 1963 Sep;168:345–359. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rushton W. A. The rod dark adaptation curve measured above cone threshold. J Physiol. 1965 Dec;181(3):641–644. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Tomita T., Kaneko A., Murakami M., Pautler E. L. Spectral response curves of single cones in the carp. Vision Res. 1967 Jul;7(7):519–531. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(67)90061-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. WALD G. THE RECEPTORS OF HUMAN COLOR VISION. Science. 1964 Sep 4;145(3636):1007–1016. doi: 10.1126/science.145.3636.1007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES