Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1970 Aug 1;56(2):218–249. doi: 10.1085/jgp.56.2.218

Factors in the Inactivation of Postjunctional Membrane Receptors of Frog Skeletal Muscle

William L Nastuk 1, Rodney L Parsons 1
PMCID: PMC2225860  PMID: 5433468

Abstract

Several factors which influence the rate of inactivation of muscle postjunctional membrane (PJM) receptors during the sustained application of carbamylcholine (CARB) have been studied by two methods. The rate of inactivation was increased by elevating the tonicity of the bathing medium, by increasing the CARB concentration, by raising the calcium ion concentration, and by substituting SO4 = for Cl- ions in the extracellular fluid. The relative effectiveness of calcium and other divalent cations in receptor inactivation was compared. In the absence of calcium, other divalent cations such as magnesium, strontium, or manganese were not efficient substitutes for calcium. In the presence of calcium, the addition of strontium or manganese ions accelerated the rate of receptor inactivation, but the addition of magnesium (up to 12 mM) inhibited this process. The inactivation of the membrane receptors in denervated muscle fibers was found to be similar to that in innervated muscle fibers. Various factors in PJM receptor inactivation are discussed. It is suggested that PJM receptor inactivation is influenced by the binding of calcium ions to sites on the internal surface of the PJM.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Birks R. I., Davey D. F. Osmotic responses demonstrating the extracellular character of the sarcoplasmic reticulum. J Physiol. 1969 May;202(1):171–188. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blaustein M. P., Goldman D. E. The action of certain polyvalent cations on the voltage-clamped lobster axon. J Gen Physiol. 1968 Mar;51(3):279–291. doi: 10.1085/jgp.51.3.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DEL CASTILLO J., ENGBAEK L. The nature of the neuromuscular block produced by magnesium. J Physiol. 1954 May 28;124(2):370–384. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DEL CASTILLO J., KATZ B. The effect of magnesium on the activity of motor nerve endings. J Physiol. 1954 Jun 28;124(3):553–559. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Elmqvist D., Feldman D. S. Spontaneous activity at a mammalian neuromuscular junction in tetrodotoxin. Acta Physiol Scand. 1965 Aug;64(4):475–476. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1965.tb04206.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. FATT P., KATZ B. Spontaneous subthreshold activity at motor nerve endings. J Physiol. 1952 May;117(1):109–128. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. FRANKENHAEUSER B., HODGKIN A. L. The action of calcium on the electrical properties of squid axons. J Physiol. 1957 Jul 11;137(2):218–244. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. FREYGANG W. H., Jr, GOLDSTEIN D. A., HELLAM D. C., PEACHEY L. D. THE RELATION BETWEEN THE LATE AFTER-POTENTIAL AND THE SIZE OF THE TRANSVERSE TUBULAR SYSTEM OF FROG MUSCLE. J Gen Physiol. 1964 Nov;48:235–263. doi: 10.1085/jgp.48.2.235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gissen A. J., Nastuk W. L. The mechanisms underlying neuromuscular block following prolonged exposure to depolarizing agents. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1966 Jan 26;135(1):184–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1966.tb45472.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HODGKIN A. L., HOROWICZ P. The influence of potassium and chloride ions on the membrane potential of single muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1959 Oct;148:127–160. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hagiwara S., Nakajima S. Differences in Na and Ca spikes as examined by application of tetrodotoxin, procaine, and manganese ions. J Gen Physiol. 1966 Mar;49(4):793–806. doi: 10.1085/jgp.49.4.793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. JENDEN D. J., REGER J. F. THE ROLE OF RESTING POTENTIAL CHANGES IN THE CONTRACTILE FAILURE OF FROG SARTORIUS MUSCLES DURING CALCIUM DEPRIVATION. J Physiol. 1963 Dec;169:889–901. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Katz B., Miledi R. Tetrodotoxin and neuromuscular transmission. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1967 Jan 31;167(1006):8–22. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1967.0010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. MAMBRINI J., BENOIT P. R. ACTION DU CALCIUM SUR LA JONCTION NEURO-MUSCULAIRE CHEZ LA GRENOUILLE. C R Seances Soc Biol Fil. 1964;158:1454–1458. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. MARTIN A. R. A further study of the statistical composition on the end-plate potential. J Physiol. 1955 Oct 28;130(1):114–122. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Manthey A. A. The effect of calcium on the desensitization of membrane receptors at the neuromuscular junction. J Gen Physiol. 1966 May;49(5):963–976. doi: 10.1085/jgp.49.5.963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Marco L. A., Nastuk W. L. Sarcomeric oscillations in frog skeletal muscle fibers. Science. 1968 Sep 27;161(3848):1357–1358. doi: 10.1126/science.161.3848.1357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. NASTUK W. L. Some ionic factors that influence the action of acetylcholine at the muscle end-plate membrane. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1959 Aug 28;81:317–327. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1959.tb49316.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. NASTUK W. L. The electrical activity of the muscle cell membrane at the neuromuscular junction. J Cell Physiol. 1953 Oct;42(2):249–272. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1030420206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nastuk W. L. Activation and inactivation of muscle postjunctional receptors. Fed Proc. 1967 Nov-Dec;26(6):1639–1646. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nastuk W. L., Manthey A. A., Gissen A. J. Activation and inactivation of postjunctional membrane receptors. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1966 Jul 14;137(2):999–1014. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1966.tb50212.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Parsons R. L., Nastuk W. L. Activation of contractile system in depolarized skeletal muscle fibers. Am J Physiol. 1969 Aug;217(2):364–369. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1969.217.2.364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Podolsky R. J., Costantin L. L. The internal membrane system and muscle activation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1966 Jul 14;137(2):1038–1040. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1966.tb50215.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. TAKEUCHI N. Some properties of conductance changes at the end-plate membrane during the action of acetylcholine. J Physiol. 1963 Jun;167:128–140. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Watkins J. C. Pharmacological receptors and general permeability phenomena of cell membranes. J Theor Biol. 1965 Jul;9(1):37–50. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(65)90055-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES