Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1969 Jul 1;54(1):1–32. doi: 10.1085/jgp.54.1.1

Spectral Sensitivities of Wolf Spider Eyes

Robert D DeVoe 1, Ralph J W Small 1, Janis E Zvargulis 1
PMCID: PMC2225900  PMID: 5792363

Abstract

ERG's to spectral lights were recorded from all eyes of intact wolf spiders. Secondary eyes have maximum relative sensitivities at 505–510 nm which are unchanged by chromatic adaptations. Principal eyes have ultraviolet sensitivities which are 10 to 100 times greater at 380 nm than at 505 nm. However, two animals' eyes initially had greater blue-green sensitivities, then in 7 to 10 wk dropped 4 to 6 log units in absolute sensitivity in the visible, less in the ultraviolet. Chromatic adaptations of both types of principal eyes hardly changed relative spectral sensitivities. Small decreases in relative sensitivity in the visible with orange adaptations were possibly retinomotor in origin. Second peaks in ERG waveforms were elicited from ultraviolet-adapted principal eyes by wavelengths 400 nm and longer, and from blue-, yellow-, and orange-adapted secondary eyes by wavelengths 580 nm and longer. The second peaks in waveforms were most likely responses of unilluminated eyes to scattered light. It is concluded that both principal and secondary eyes contain cells with a visual pigment absorbing maximally at 505–510 nm. The variable absolute and ultraviolet sensitivities of principal eyes may be due to a second pigment in the same cells or to an ultraviolet-absorbing accessory pigment which excites the 505 nm absorbing visual pigment by radiationless energy transfer.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BERNHARD C. G., OTTOSON D. QUANTITATIVE STUDIES ON PIGMENT MIGRATION AND LIGHT SENSITIVITY IN THE COMPOUND EYE AT DIFFERENT LIGHT INTENSITIES. J Gen Physiol. 1964 Jan;47:465–478. doi: 10.1085/jgp.47.3.465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bennett R. R. Spectral sensitivity studies on the whirligig beetle, Dineutes ciliatus. J Insect Physiol. 1967 Apr;13(4):621–633. doi: 10.1016/0022-1910(67)90073-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. CHANCE B. FLUORESCENCE EMISSION OF MITOCHONDRIAL DPNH AS A FACTOR IN THE ULTRAVIOLET SENSITIVITY OF VISUAL RECEPTORS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1964 Feb;51:359–361. doi: 10.1073/pnas.51.2.359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. CONE R. A. QUANTUM RELATIONS OF THE RAT ELECTRORETINOGRAM. J Gen Physiol. 1963 Jul;46:1267–1286. doi: 10.1085/jgp.46.6.1267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chapman R. M., Lall A. B. Electroretinogram characteristics and the spectral mechanisms of the median ocellus and the lateral eye in Limulus polyphemus. J Gen Physiol. 1967 Oct;50(9):2267–2287. doi: 10.1085/jgp.50.9.2267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DeVoe R. D. A nonlinear model for transient responses from light-adapted wolf spider eyes. J Gen Physiol. 1967 Sep;50(8):1993–2030. doi: 10.1085/jgp.50.8.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. DeVoe R. D. Nonlinear transient responses from light-adapted wolf spider eyes to changes in background illumination. J Gen Physiol. 1967 Sep;50(8):1961–1991. doi: 10.1085/jgp.50.8.1961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. FUORTES M. G., HODGKIN A. L. CHANGES IN TIME SCALE AND SENSITIVITY IN THE OMMATIDIA OF LIMULUS. J Physiol. 1964 Aug;172:239–263. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. GIULIO L. [The ocellar electroetinogram in Tegenaria (Araneae, Agelenidae). III. Spectral sensitivity]. Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper. 1962 Oct 15;38:915–916. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. GOLDSMITH T. H., RUCK P. R. The spectral sensitivities of the dorsal ocelli of cockroaches and honeybees; an electrophysiological study. J Gen Physiol. 1958 Jul 20;41(6):1171–1185. doi: 10.1085/jgp.41.6.1171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Machan L. The effect of prolonged dark adaptation on sensitivity and the correlation of shielding pigment in the median and lateral eyes of the scorpion. Comp Biochem Physiol. 1968 Jul;26(1):365–368. doi: 10.1016/0010-406x(68)90342-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Naegele J. A., McEnroe W. D., Soans A. B. Spectral sensitivity and orientation response of the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Kock, from 350 millimicron to 700 millimicron. J Insect Physiol. 1966 Sep;12(9):1187–1195. doi: 10.1016/0022-1910(66)90131-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nolte J., Brown J. E., Smith T. G., Jr A hyperpolarizing component of the receptor potential in the median ocellus of Limulus. Science. 1968 Nov 8;162(3854):677–679. doi: 10.1126/science.162.3854.677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES