Abstract
The inhibition that is exerted mutually among receptor units (ommatidia) of the lateral eye of Limulus does not diminish uniformly with increasing distance between units. Instead the response of a receptor unit is most effectively inhibited by other units separated from it by approximately 1 mm (three to five receptor diameters); the effectiveness diminishes with distances both greater and less than this value. The ommatidial inhibitory field as measured by the spatial function of the inhibitory coefficients contains a uniform depression in the central region, a uniformly high annulus at some distance from the center, and a gradual tapering off toward the periphery. The field is large—covering over 30 % of the retina—and is somewhat elliptical in shape with its major axis in the anteroposterior direction on the lateral eye. A number of experiments reveal similar configurations in a sizable part of the eye. Control experiments show that the diminution of the inhibitory effects near the center of the field is not an artifact of the measuring technique and cannot be explained readily by local neural excitatory processes.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (972.2 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- HARTLINE H. K., RATLIFF F. Inhibitory interaction of receptor units in the eye of Limulus. J Gen Physiol. 1957 Jan 20;40(3):357–376. doi: 10.1085/jgp.40.3.357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jenks G. F., Brown D. A. Three-dimensional map construction. Science. 1966 Nov 18;154(3751):857–864. doi: 10.1126/science.154.3751.857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KUFFLER S. W. Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalian retina. J Neurophysiol. 1953 Jan;16(1):37–68. doi: 10.1152/jn.1953.16.1.37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MOORE J. W., ULBRICHT W., TAKATA M. EFFECT OF ETHANOL ON THE SODIUM AND POTASSIUM CONDUCTANCES OF THE SQUID AXON MEMBRANE. J Gen Physiol. 1964 Nov;48:279–295. doi: 10.1085/jgp.48.2.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Michael C. R. Receptive fields of single optic nerve fibers in a mammal with an all-cone retina. I: contrast-sensitive units. J Neurophysiol. 1968 Mar;31(2):249–256. doi: 10.1152/jn.1968.31.2.249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Milkman N., Schoenfeld R. L. A digital programmer for stimuli and computer control in neurophysiological experiments. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1966 Jan 31;128(3):861–875. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1965.tb11704.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- RATLIFF F., HARTLINE H. K. The responses of Limulus optic nerve fibers to patterns of illumination on the receptor mosaic. J Gen Physiol. 1959 Jul 20;42(6):1241–1255. doi: 10.1085/jgp.42.6.1241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ratliff F., Knight B. W., Graham N. On tuning and amplification by lateral inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Mar;62(3):733–740. doi: 10.1073/pnas.62.3.733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WAGNER H. G., MACNICHOL E. F., Jr, WOLBARSHT M. L. Functional basis for "on"-center and "off"-center receptive fields in the retina. J Opt Soc Am. 1963 Jan;53:66–70. doi: 10.1364/josa.53.000066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]