Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1969 Sep 1;54(3):352–368. doi: 10.1085/jgp.54.3.352

Mechanical Threshold As a Factor in Excitation-Contraction Coupling

Stuart R Taylor 1, Hanna Preiser 1, Alexander Sandow 1
PMCID: PMC2225934  PMID: 5806594

Abstract

I-, CH3SO4 -, and ClO4 -, like other previously studied type A twitch potentiators (Br-, NO3 -, SCN-, and caffeine), lower the mechanical threshold in K depolarization contractures of frog skeletal muscle. In potentiated twitches, I-, Br-, CH3SO4 -, ClO4, and SCN, as already reported for NO3 - and caffeine, slightly shorten the latent period (L) and considerably increase the rate of tension development (dP/dt) during the first few milliseconds of the contraction period. Divalent cations (8 mM Ca2+, 0.5–1.0 mM Zn2+ and Cd2+) raise the mechanical threshold of contractures, and correspondingly affect the twitch by depressing the tension output, increasing L, and decreasing the early dP/dt, thus acting oppositely to the type A potentiators. These various results form a broad, consistent pattern indicating that electromechanical coupling in the twitch is conditioned by a mechanical threshold as it is in the contracture, and suggesting that the lower the threshold, in reference to the raised threshold under the action of the divalent cations, the more effective is a given action potential in activating the twitch as regards especially both its early rate and peak magnitude of tension development. The results suggest that the direct action by which the various agents affect the level of the mechanical threshold involves effects on E-C coupling processes of the T tubular and/or the sarcoplasmic reticulum which control the release of Ca for activating contraction.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BIANCHI C. P. Kinetics of radiocaffeine uptake and release in frog sartorius. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1962 Oct;138:41–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carvalho A. P. Effects of potentiators of muscular contraction on binding of cations by sarcoplasmic reticulum. J Gen Physiol. 1968 Mar;51(3):427–442. doi: 10.1085/jgp.51.3.427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. EDWARDS C., RITCHIE J. M., WILKIE D. R. The effect of some cations on the active state of muscle. J Physiol. 1956 Aug 28;133(2):412–419. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. ETZENSPERGER J., GASCIOLLI A. M. ACTION DE LA CAF'EINE SUR LES CONTRACTURES DE D'EPOLARISATION PRODUITES PAR LE POTASSIUM CHEZ LE MUSCLE STRI'E DE GRENOUILLE. C R Seances Soc Biol Fil. 1963;157:1776–1779. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Edman K. A., Grieve D. W., Nilsson E. Studies of the excitation-contraction mechanism in the skeletal muscle and the myocardium. Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere. 1966;290(4):320–334. doi: 10.1007/BF00363311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Endo M. Entry of fluorescent dyes into the sarcotubular system of the frog muscle. J Physiol. 1966 Jul;185(1):224–238. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. FALK G., LANDA J. F. Prolonged response of skeletal muscle in the absence of penetrating anions. Am J Physiol. 1960 Feb;198:289–299. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1960.198.2.289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Foulks J. G., Perry F. A. The time course of early changes in the rate of tension development in electrically-stimulated frog toe muscle: effects of muscle length, temperature and twitch-potentiators. J Physiol. 1966 Jul;185(2):355–381. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HODGKIN A. L., HOROWICZ P. The influence of potassium and chloride ions on the membrane potential of single muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1959 Oct;148:127–160. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. ISAACSON A., SANDOW A. Effects of zinc on responses of skeletal muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1963 Mar;46:655–677. doi: 10.1085/jgp.46.4.655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. ISHIKO N., SATO M. The effect of calcium ions on electrical properties of striated muscle fibres. Jpn J Physiol. 1957 Mar 15;7(1):51–63. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.7.51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Isaacson A., Sandow A. Quinine and caffeine effects on 45Ca movements in frog sartorius muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1967 Sep;50(8):2109–2128. doi: 10.1085/jgp.50.8.2109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. MASHIMA H., MATSUMURA M. Roles of external ions in the excitation-contraction coupling of frog skeletal muscle. Jpn J Physiol. 1962 Dec 15;12:639–653. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.12.639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. MASHIMA H., WASHIO H. THE EFFECT OF ZINC ON THE ELECTRICAL PROPERTIES OF MEMBRANE AND THE TWITCH TENSION IN FROG MUSCLE FIBRES. Jpn J Physiol. 1964 Oct 15;14:538–550. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.14.538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. MULLINS L. J., NODA K. THE INFLUENCE OF SODIUM-FREE SOLUTIONS ON THE MEMBRANE POTENTIAL OF FROG MUSCLE FIBERS. J Gen Physiol. 1963 Sep;47:117–132. doi: 10.1085/jgp.47.1.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. ORKAND R. K. Chemical inhibition of contraction in directly stimulated crayfish muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1962 Oct;164:103–115. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp007005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Reuben J. P., Brandt P. W., Garcia H., Grundfest H. Excitation-contraction coupling in crayfish. Am Zool. 1967 Aug;7(3):623–645. doi: 10.1093/icb/7.3.623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. SANDOW A. POTENTIATION OF MUSCULAR CONTRACTION. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1964 Feb;45:62–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. SANDOW A., PREISER H. MUSCULAR CONTRACTION AS REGULATED BY THE ACTION POTENTIAL. Science. 1964 Dec 11;146(3650):1470–1472. doi: 10.1126/science.146.3650.1470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. SANDOW A., TAYLOR S. R., ISAASON A., SEGUIN J. J. ELECTROCHEMICAL COUPLING IN POTENTIATION OF MUSCULAR CONTRACTION. Science. 1964 Feb 7;143(3606):577–579. doi: 10.1126/science.143.3606.577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. SZAIMI T., TOMITA T. ELECTRICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FROG SKELETAL MUSCLE MEMBRANE IN CL-FREE SULPHATE-, FERROCYANIDE-, AND GLUTAMATE-RINGER'S SOLUTIONS. Jpn J Physiol. 1963 Dec 15;13:641–656. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.13.641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sandow A. Excitation-contraction coupling in skeletal muscle. Pharmacol Rev. 1965 Sep;17(3):265–320. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sandow A., Taylor S. R., Preiser H. Role of the action potential in excitation-contraction coupling. Fed Proc. 1965 Sep-Oct;24(5):1116–1123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Weber A., Herz R. The relationship between caffeine contracture of intact muscle and the effect of caffeine on reticulum. J Gen Physiol. 1968 Nov;52(5):750–759. doi: 10.1085/jgp.52.5.750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES