Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1970 Nov 1;56(5):640–671. doi: 10.1085/jgp.56.5.640

Linear Electrical Properties of the Transverse Tubules and Surface Membrane of Skeletal Muscle Fibers

Martin F Schneider 1
PMCID: PMC2225972  PMID: 5475999

Abstract

With the use of two intracellular microelectrodes and a circuit designed to compensate for the effects of stray capacitances around the electrodes, transfer impedance measurements were made at frequencies from 0.5 to 1000 c/s on frog sartorius muscle fibers bathed in 7.5 mM K Ringer solution. Complete AC cable analyses performed at 46, 100, 215, 464, and 1000 c/s showed that the fibers behaved as ideal one-dimensional cables having purely resistive internal impedances (Ri = 102 ± 11 Ω cm). Two circuits were considered for fiber inside-outside impedance, a four lumped parameter circuit and a parallel resistance and capacitance shunted by the input impedance of a lattice model for the T-system. Least squares fits to fiber input impedance phase angles were better with the latter circuit than with the former. With the use of the lattice model the specific capacitance of both the surface and transverse tubule membranes was found to be 1 µF/cm2 and the internal resistivity of the tubules to be about 300 Ω cm.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ADRIAN R. H. Internal chloride concentration and chloride efflux of frog muscle. J Physiol. 1961 May;156:623–632. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adrian R. H., Chandler W. K., Hodgkin A. L. The kinetics of mechanical activation in frog muscle. J Physiol. 1969 Sep;204(1):207–230. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Adrian R. H., Costantin L. L., Peachey L. D. Radial spread of contraction in frog muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1969 Sep;204(1):231–257. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Eisenberg R. S., Gage P. W. Ionic conductances of the surface and transverse tubular membranes of frog sartorius fibers. J Gen Physiol. 1969 Mar;53(3):279–297. doi: 10.1085/jgp.53.3.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. FALK G., FATT P. LINEAR ELECTRICAL PROPERTIES OF STRIATED MUSCLE FIBRES OBSERVED WITH INTRACELLULAR ELECTRODES. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1964 Apr 14;160:69–123. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1964.0030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. FATT P. AN ANALYSIS OF THE TRANSVERSE ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE OF STRIATED MUSCLE. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1964 Mar 17;159:606–651. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1964.0023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Freygang W. H., Jr, Rapoport S. I., Peachey L. D. Some relations between changes in the linear electrical properties of striated muscle fibers and changes in ultrastructure. J Gen Physiol. 1967 Nov;50(10):2437–2458. doi: 10.1085/jgp.50.10.2437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HODGKIN A. L., HOROWICZ P. The effect of sudden changes in ionic concentrations on the membrane potential of single muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1960 Sep;153:370–385. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HODGKIN A. L., HOROWICZ P. The influence of potassium and chloride ions on the membrane potential of single muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1959 Oct;148:127–160. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HUXLEY A. F., TAYLOR R. E. Local activation of striated muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1958 Dec 30;144(3):426–441. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. JENERICK H. P. Muscle membrane potential, resistance, and external potassium chloride. J Cell Physiol. 1953 Dec;42(3):427–448. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1030420309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Johnson E. A., Sommer J. R. A strand of cardiac muscle. Its ultrastructure and the electrophysiological implications of its geometry. J Cell Biol. 1967 Apr;33(1):103–129. doi: 10.1083/jcb.33.1.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Peachey L. D., Schild R. F. The distribution of the T-system along the sarcomeres of frog and toad sartorius muscles. J Physiol. 1968 Jan;194(1):249–258. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Peachey L. D. The sarcoplasmic reticulum and transverse tubules of the frog's sartorius. J Cell Biol. 1965 Jun;25(3 Suppl):209–231. doi: 10.1083/jcb.25.3.209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. SPERELAKIS N., HOSHIKO T. Electrical impedance of cardiac muscle. Circ Res. 1961 Nov;9:1280–1283. doi: 10.1161/01.res.9.6.1280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sommer J. R., Johnson E. A. Cardiac muscle. A comparative study of Purkinje fibers and ventricular fibers. J Cell Biol. 1968 Mar;36(3):497–526. doi: 10.1083/jcb.36.3.497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. TASAKI I., HAGIWARA S. Capacity of muscle fiber membrane. Am J Physiol. 1957 Mar;188(3):423–429. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1957.188.3.423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES