Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1959 Apr;45(4):592–617. doi: 10.1073/pnas.45.4.592

DECREMENTAL CONDUCTION IN PERIPHERAL NERVE. INTEGRATION OF STIMULI IN THE NEURON

R Lorente De Nó 1, G A Condouris 1,*
PMCID: PMC222605  PMID: 16590422

Full text

PDF
592

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ALTAMIRANO M., COATES C. W., GRUNDFEST H. Mechanisms of direct and neural excitability in electroplaques of electric eel. J Gen Physiol. 1955 Jan 20;38(3):319–360. doi: 10.1085/jgp.38.3.319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adrian E. D. On the conduction of subnormal disturbances in normal nerve. J Physiol. 1912 Dec 9;45(5):389–412. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1912.sp001560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Adrian E. D. On the summation of propagated disturbances in nerve and muscle. J Physiol. 1912 Mar 29;44(1-2):68–124. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1912.sp001503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Adrian E. D. The all-or-none principle in nerve. J Physiol. 1914 Feb 27;47(6):460–474. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1914.sp001637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Adrian E. D. Wedensky inhibition in relation to the ;all-or-none' principle in nerve. J Physiol. 1913 Jul 18;46(4-5):384–412. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1913.sp001598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. BISHOP G. H. Natural history of the nerve impulse. Physiol Rev. 1956 Jul;36(3):376–399. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1956.36.3.376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. BREMER F. Cerebral and cerebellar potentials. Physiol Rev. 1958 Jul;38(3):357–388. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1958.38.3.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. COOMBS J. S., CURTIS D. R., ECCLES J. C. The generation of impulses in motoneurones. J Physiol. 1957 Dec 3;139(2):232–249. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. ECCLES J. C., LIBET B., YOUNG R. R. The behaviour of chromatolysed motoneurones studied by intracellular recording. J Physiol. 1958 Aug 29;143(1):11–40. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HODGKIN A. L. Ionic movements and electrical activity in giant nerve fibres. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1958 Jan 1;148(930):1–37. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1958.0001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kato G., Teruuchi D. Is there "transitional decrement" in narcotised nerve? J Physiol. 1927 Nov 21;64(2):193–198. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1927.sp002429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. LLOYD D. P. Early and late post-tetanic potentiation, and post-tetanic block in a monosynaptic reflex pathway. J Gen Physiol. 1959 Jan 20;42(3):475–488. doi: 10.1085/jgp.42.3.475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lucas K. The effect of alcohol on the excitation, conduction and recovery processes in nerve. J Physiol. 1913 Aug 18;46(6):470–505. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1913.sp001601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. MUELLER P. Effects of external currents on duration and amplitude of normal and prolonged action potentials from single nodes of Ranvier. J Gen Physiol. 1958 Sep 20;42(1):163–191. doi: 10.1085/jgp.42.1.163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. RUDOLPH G. Zur Physiologie der Impulsentstehung und Impulsfortleitung im peripheren Nerven; Untersuchungen an einzelnen aktiven Fasern im intakten Nervenstamm. Ann Univ Sarav Med. 1956;4(1):1–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES