Abstract
The electrical properties of gustatory cells and cells which do not respond to chemical stimuli in the taste bud of fungiform papillae in rats were studied by means of intracellular microelectrodes. Neither of these cell types showed spike electrogenesis. Gustatory cells showed a depolarization, the receptor potential, associated with an increase in the membrane conductance in response to NaCl, sucrose, and HCl, whereas quinine produced a decrease in the conductance together with an increase in the receptor potential magnitude. The reversal point of the receptor potential in response to NaCl or KCl was close to zero membrane potential, but in the case of quinine it was at a more negative potential level than the resting potential. From these results two receptive processes are postulated in the gustatory cell membrane. When the gustatory cells were stimulated for a long duration by concentrated NaCl or sucrose, receptor potentials showed adaptation with decrease in magnitude, but adaptation of the responses to HCl and quinine were hardly detected. Adaptation of the receptor potential was not correlated with conductance change.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (706.0 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Adrian R. H., Peachey L. D. The membrane capacity of frog twitch and slow muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1965 Nov;181(2):324–336. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BEIDLER L. M. A theory of taste stimulation. J Gen Physiol. 1954 Nov 20;38(2):133–139. doi: 10.1085/jgp.38.2.133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FARBMAN A. I. ELECTRON MICROSCOPE STUDY OF THE DEVELOPING TASTE BUD IN RAT FUNGIFORM PAPILLA. Dev Biol. 1965 Feb;11:110–135. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(65)90040-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FATT P., KATZ B. An analysis of the end-plate potential recorded with an intracellular electrode. J Physiol. 1951 Nov 28;115(3):320–370. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1951.sp004675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hiji Y. Gustatory response and preference behavior in alloxan diabetic rats. Kumamoto Med J. 1969 Sep 30;22(3):109–118. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KIMURA K., BEIDLER L. M. Microelectrode study of taste receptors of rat and hamster. J Cell Comp Physiol. 1961 Oct;58:131–139. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1030580204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sato T. The response of frog taste cells (Rana nigromaculata and Rana catesbeana). Experientia. 1969;25(7):709–710. doi: 10.1007/BF01897577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- TATEDA H., BEIDLER L. M. THE RECEPTOR POTENTIAL OF THE TASTE CELL OF THE RAT. J Gen Physiol. 1964 Jan;47:479–486. doi: 10.1085/jgp.47.3.479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tomita T. Membrane capacity and resistance of mammalian smooth muscle. J Theor Biol. 1966 Nov;12(2):216–227. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(66)90114-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weight F. F., Votava J. Slow synaptic excitation in sympathetic ganglion cells: evidence for synaptic inactivation of potassium conductance. Science. 1970 Nov 13;170(3959):755–758. doi: 10.1126/science.170.3959.755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]