Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1972 Sep 1;60(3):351–365. doi: 10.1085/jgp.60.3.351

Positive and Negative Inotropic Effects of Elevated Extracellular Potassium Level on Mammalian Ventricular Muscle

Frederic Kavaler 1, Paul M Hyman 1, Robert B Lefkowitz 1
PMCID: PMC2226070  PMID: 5055792

Abstract

The effect of moderate elevation in extracellular potassium concentration (up to 12 mM) on contraction of cat ventricular muscle was examined. Isometric force development was recorded from eight excised trabeculae and from six coronary-perfused in situ papillary muscle preparations. Contraction in the steady state was variably affected, sometimes decreasing monotonically, sometimes remaining unchanged, with increasing potassium level. In 11 of these 14 preparations, the steady state was preceded by a transient period in which the contraction was augmented. In addition, eight excised trabeculae were used in an experimental arrangement designed to distinguish between inotropic effects caused by potassium-induced alterations in the action potential and other, more direct, effects of this ion on contraction. The negative inotropic effect is attributable to a potassium-induced reduction in the amplitude and/or duration of the action potential plateau. The positive inotropic effect was found in experimental arrangements where effects of the potassium-rich medium on action potential time-course were effectively "buffered." The positive inotropic effect thus depends on the presence of the elevated potassium concentration and can occur independently of effects on the action potential time-course.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (902.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beeler G. W., Jr, Reuter H. Membrane calcium current in ventricular myocardial fibres. J Physiol. 1970 Mar;207(1):191–209. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beeler G. W., Jr, Reuter H. The relation between membrane potential, membrane currents and activation of contraction in ventricular myocardial fibres. J Physiol. 1970 Mar;207(1):211–229. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chapman J. B. Potentiating effect of potassium on skeletal muscle twitch. Am J Physiol. 1969 Sep;217(3):898–902. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1969.217.3.898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clinch N. F. Active state prolongation associated with depolarization in frog's skeletal muscle. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1968 Sep;46(5):805–807. doi: 10.1139/y68-124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. ENGSTFELD G., ANTONI H., FLECKENSTEIN A. [The restoration of stimulus transmission and contraction power of K ion paralysed frog and mammalian myocardium by adrenaline. Analysis of an effect of adrenaline not observed until now]. Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere. 1961;273:145–163. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. GARB S. The effects of potassium, ammonium, calcium, strontium and magnesium on the electrogram and myogram of mammalian heart muscle. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1951 Apr;101(4):317–326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. GOODYER A. V., GOODKIND M. J., STANLEY E. J. THE EFFECTS OF ABNORMAL CONCENTRATIONS OF THE SERUM ELECTROLYTES ON LEFT VENTRICULAR FUNCTION IN THE INTACT ANIMAL. Am Heart J. 1964 Jun;67:779–791. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(64)90179-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. GREEN J. P., GIARMAN N. J., SALTER W. T. Combined effects of calcium and potassium on contractility and excitability of the mammalian myocardium. Am J Physiol. 1952 Oct;171(1):174–177. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1952.171.1.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gibbons W. R., Fozzard H. A. Voltage dependence and time dependence of contraction in sheep cardiac Purkinje fibers. Circ Res. 1971 Apr;28(4):446–460. doi: 10.1161/01.res.28.4.446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kavaler F., Morad M. Paradoxical effects of epinephrine on excitation-contraction coupling in cardiac muscle. Circ Res. 1966 May;18(5):492–501. doi: 10.1161/01.res.18.5.492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mascher D., Peper K. Two components of inward current in myocardial muscle fibers. Pflugers Arch. 1969;307(3):190–203. doi: 10.1007/BF00592084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Morad M., Trautwein W. The effect of the duration of the action potential on contraction in the mammalian heart muscle. Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere. 1968;299(1):66–82. doi: 10.1007/BF00362542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. PAGE E., SOLOMON A. K. Cat heart muscle in vitro. I. Cell volumes and intracellular concentrations in papillary muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1960 Nov;44:327–344. doi: 10.1085/jgp.44.2.327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sarnoff S. J., Gilmore J. P., McDonald R. H., Jr, Daggett W. M., Weisfeldt M. L., Mansfield P. B. Relationship between myocardial K+ balance, O2 consumption, and contractility. Am J Physiol. 1966 Aug;211(2):361–375. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1966.211.2.361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sumbera J. Induced changes of action potential on cardiac contraction. Experientia. 1970;26(7):738–739. doi: 10.1007/BF02232516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Van der Walt J. J., Carmeliet E. Hyperpolarization and duration of the cardiac action potential. Arch Int Physiol Biochim. 1971 Jan;79(1):149–163. doi: 10.3109/13813457109085298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Weidmann S. The diffusion of radiopotassium across intercalated disks of mammalian cardiac muscle. J Physiol. 1966 Nov;187(2):323–342. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wood E. H., Heppner R. L., Weidmann S. Inotropic effects of electric currents. I. Positive and negative effects of constant electric currents or current pulses applied during cardiac action potentials. II. Hypotheses: calcium movements, excitation-contraction coupling and inotropic effects. Circ Res. 1969 Mar;24(3):409–445. doi: 10.1161/01.res.24.3.409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES