Abstract
Attractant was added to a suspension of bacteria (the background concentration of attractant) and then these bacteria were exposed to a yet higher concentration of attractant in a capillary. Chemotaxis was measured by determining how many bacteria accumulated in the capillary. The response range for chemotaxis lies between the threshold concentration and the saturating concentration. The breadth of this range is different for attractants detected by different chemoreceptors. Attractants detected by the same chemoreceptor can have their response ranges in widely different places. Over the center of the response range (on a logarithmic scale), bacteria give similar sized responses to similar fractional increases of concentration, i.e. they respond to ratios of attractant concentration, but the response peaks at the center of the range. The size of the response is different for attractants detected by different chemoreceptors. For a detectable response, a smaller increase in attractant concentration is needed for attractants detected by some chemoreceptors than for attractants detected by others. Although the data are inadequate, it appears that the Weber law may be observed over a wide range of concentrations for some attractants but not for others. In the Appendix we aim to explain some of these results in terms of the interaction of an attractant with its chemoreceptor according to the law of mass action.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Adler J. A method for measuring chemotaxis and use of the method to determine optimum conditions for chemotaxis by Escherichia coli. J Gen Microbiol. 1973 Jan;74(1):77–91. doi: 10.1099/00221287-74-1-77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Adler J. Chemoreceptors in bacteria. Science. 1969 Dec 26;166(3913):1588–1597. doi: 10.1126/science.166.3913.1588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Armstrong J. B., Adler J., Dahl M. M. Nonchemotactic mutants of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1967 Jan;93(1):390–398. doi: 10.1128/jb.93.1.390-398.1967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BUTTIN G. M'ECANISMES R'EGULATEURS DANS LA BIOSYNTH'ESE DES ENZYMES DU M'ETABOLISME DU GALACTOSE CHEZ ESCHERICHIA COLI K12. I. LA BIOSYNTH'ESE INDUITE DE LA GALACTOKINASE ET L'INDUCTION SIMULTAN'EE DE LA S'EQUENCE ENZYMATIQUE. J Mol Biol. 1963 Aug;7:164–182. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(63)80044-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boeckh J., Kaissling K. E., Schneider D. Insect olfactory receptors. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1965;30:263–280. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1965.030.01.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boos W. The galactose binding protein and its relationship to the beta-methylgalactoside permease from Escherichia coli. Eur J Biochem. 1969 Aug;10(1):66–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1969.tb00656.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boynton R. M., Whitten D. N. Visual adaptation in monkey cones: recordings of late receptor potentials. Science. 1970 Dec 25;170(3965):1423–1426. doi: 10.1126/science.170.3965.1423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CLAYTON R. K. Studies in the phototaxis of Rhodospirillum rubrum. I. Action spectrum, growth in green light, and Weber law adherence. Arch Mikrobiol. 1953;19(2):107–124. doi: 10.1007/BF00446395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CLAYTON R. K. Studies in the phototaxis of Rhodospirillum rubrum. III. Quantitative relations between stimulus and response. Arch Mikrobiol. 1953;19(2):141–165. doi: 10.1007/BF00446397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dahlquist F. W., Lovely P., Koshland D. E., Jr Quantitative analysis of bacterial migration in chemotaxis. Nat New Biol. 1972 Mar 29;236(65):120–123. doi: 10.1038/newbio236120a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dowling J. E., Ripps H. S-potentials in the skate retina. Intracellular recordings during light and dark adaptation. J Gen Physiol. 1971 Aug;58(2):163–189. doi: 10.1085/jgp.58.2.163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hazelbauer G. L., Adler J. Role of the galactose binding protein in chemotaxis of Escherichia coli toward galactose. Nat New Biol. 1971 Mar 24;230(12):101–104. doi: 10.1038/newbio230101a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hazelbauer G. L., Mesibov R. E., Adler J. Escherichia coli mutants defective in chemotaxis toward specific chemicals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Dec;64(4):1300–1307. doi: 10.1073/pnas.64.4.1300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Macnab R. M., Koshland D. E., Jr The gradient-sensing mechanism in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Sep;69(9):2509–2512. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.9.2509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mesibov R., Adler J. Chemotaxis toward amino acids in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1972 Oct;112(1):315–326. doi: 10.1128/jb.112.1.315-326.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rotman B., Ganesan A. K., Guzman R. Transport systems for galactose and galactosides in Escherichia coli. II. Substrate and inducer specificities. J Mol Biol. 1968 Sep 14;36(2):247–260. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(68)90379-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stevens S. S. Neural events and the psychophysical law. Science. 1970 Dec 4;170(3962):1043–1050. doi: 10.1126/science.170.3962.1043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Werblin F. S. Adaptation in a vertebrate retina: intracellular recording in Necturus. J Neurophysiol. 1971 Mar;34(2):228–241. doi: 10.1152/jn.1971.34.2.228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]