Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1976 Sep 1;68(3):247–265. doi: 10.1085/jgp.68.3.247

Sarcomere lengthening and tension drop in the latent period of isolated frog skeletal muscle fibers

PMCID: PMC2228432  PMID: 956088

Abstract

A laser diffraction technique has been developed for registering small changes in sarcomere length. The technique is capable of resolving changes as small as 0.2 A in isolated frog skeletal muscle fibers. The small sarcomere lengthening that accompanies the drop in tension in the latent period of contraction was investigated. We suggest this lengthening be named latency elongation (LE). The LE is present in a completely slack fiber and must, therefore, be caused by a forcible lengthening process. Furthermore, the LE is dependent on the existence of an overlap between thin and tick filaments. The rate of elongation and the time interval between stimulation and maximum elongation may vary along the fiber. The maximum elongation was 3-5 A per sarcomere. At any instant the drop in tension is a product of the sum of sarcomere lengthenings along the fiber and the slope stiffness of the series elasticity. The latency relaxation (LR) could be registered in the sarcomere length range from 2.2 mum to 3.6-3.7 mum. The amplitude went through a sharp maximum at 3.0-3.1 mum. In the sarcomere length range from 2.2 to 2.8 mum the delay from onset to maximum LR was nearly proportional to the distance from the Z-line to the overlap zone. A working hypothesis is presented. It is suggested that the LE is caused by a lengthening of the thin filaments.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ABBOTT B. C., BASKIN R. J. Volume changes in frog muscle during contraction. J Physiol. 1962 May;161:379–391. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cleworth D. R., Edman K. A. Changes in sarcomere length during isometric tension development in frog skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1972 Dec;227(1):1–17. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp010016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Close R. I. The relations between sarcomere length and characteristics of isometric twitch contractions of frog sartorius muscle. J Physiol. 1972 Feb;220(3):745–762. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ebashi S., Endo M. Calcium ion and muscle contraction. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1968;18:123–183. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(68)90023-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gordon A. M., Huxley A. F., Julian F. J. The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1966 May;184(1):170–192. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HUXLEY A. F. Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog Biophys Biophys Chem. 1957;7:255–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HUXLEY A. F., PEACHEY L. D. The maximum length for contraction in vertebrate straiated muscle. J Physiol. 1961 Apr;156:150–165. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Haselgrove J. C. X-ray evidence for conformational changes in the myosin filaments of vertebrate striated muscle. J Mol Biol. 1975 Feb 15;92(1):113–143. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(75)90094-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hill D. K. Tension due to interaction between the sliding filaments in resting striated muscle. The effect of stimulation. J Physiol. 1968 Dec;199(3):637–684. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Huxley H. E., Brown W. The low-angle x-ray diagram of vertebrate striated muscle and its behaviour during contraction and rigor. J Mol Biol. 1967 Dec 14;30(2):383–434. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(67)80046-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kawai M., Kuntz I. D. Optical diffraction studies of muscle fibers. Biophys J. 1973 Sep;13(9):857–876. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(73)86031-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Matsumura M. On the nature of the latency relaxation of frog skeletal muscle. Jpn J Physiol. 1969 Dec;19(6):701–711. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.19.701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Moss R. L., Sollins M. R., Julian F. J. Calcium activation produces a characteristic response to stretch in both skeletal and cardiac muscle. Nature. 1976 Apr 15;260(5552):619–621. doi: 10.1038/260619a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mulieri L. A. The dependence of the latency relaxation on sarcomere length and other characteristics of isolated muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1972 Jun;223(2):333–354. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Peachey L. D. Muscle. Annu Rev Physiol. 1968;30:401–440. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.30.030168.002153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Vibert P. J., Haselgrove J. C., Lowy J., Poulsen F. R. Structural changes in actin-containing filaments of muscle. Nat New Biol. 1972 Apr 12;236(67):182–183. doi: 10.1038/newbio236182a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES