Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1977 Jul 1;70(1):1–21. doi: 10.1085/jgp.70.1.1

Delayed rectification in the transverse tubules: origin of the late after-potential in frog skeletal muscle

PMCID: PMC2228455  PMID: 894247

Abstract

Tetanic stimulation of skeletal muscle fibers elicits a train of spikes followed by a long-lasting depolarization called the late after- potential (LAP). We have conducted experiments to determine the origin of the LAP. Isolated single muscle fibers were treated with a high potassium solution (5 mM or 10 mM K) followed by a sudden reduction of potassium concentration to 2.5 mM. This procedure produced a slow repolarization (K repolarization), which reflects a diffusional outflow of potassium from inside the lumen of the transverse tubular system (T system). Tetanic stimulation was then applied to the same fiber and the LAP was recorded. The time courses of K repolarization and LAP decay were compared and found to be roughly the same. This approximate equality held under various conditions that changed the time courses of both events over a wide range. Both K repolarization and the LAP became slower as fiber radius increased. These results suggest that LAP decay and K repolarization represent the same process. Thus, we conclude that the LAP is caused by potassium accumulation in the T system. A consequence of this conclusion is that delayed rectification channels exist in the T system. A rough estimation suggests that the density of delayed rectification channels is less in the T system than in the surface membrane.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adrian R. H., Chandler W. K., Hodgkin A. L. Slow changes in potassium permeability in skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1970 Jul;208(3):645–668. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adrian R. H., Chandler W. K., Hodgkin A. L. The kinetics of mechanical activation in frog muscle. J Physiol. 1969 Sep;204(1):207–230. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Adrian R. H., Chandler W. K., Hodgkin A. L. Voltage clamp experiments in striated muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1970 Jul;208(3):607–644. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Adrian R. H., Freygang W. H. The potassium and chloride conductance of frog muscle membrane. J Physiol. 1962 Aug;163(1):61–103. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Adrian R. H., Peachey L. D. Reconstruction of the action potential of frog sartorius muscle. J Physiol. 1973 Nov;235(1):103–131. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Almers W. The decline of potassium permeability during extreme hyperpolarization in frog skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1972 Aug;225(1):57–83. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Barry P. H., Adrian R. H. Slow conductance changes due to potassium depletion in the transverse tubules of frog muscle fibers during hyperpolarizing pulses. J Membr Biol. 1973;14(3):243–292. doi: 10.1007/BF01868081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Caputo C., Dipolo R. Ionic diffusion delays in the transverse tubules of frog twitch muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1973 Mar;229(2):547–557. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Connor J. A., Walter D., McKown R. Neural repetitive firing: modifications of the Hodgkin-Huxley axon suggested by experimental results from crustacean axons. Biophys J. 1977 Apr;18(1):81–102. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(77)85598-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Costantin L. L. Contractile activation in skeletal muscle. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1975;29(2):197–224. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(76)90023-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Costantin L. L., Taylor S. R. Graded activation in frog muscle fibers. J Gen Physiol. 1973 Apr;61(4):424–443. doi: 10.1085/jgp.61.4.424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Eisenberg R. S., Gage P. W. Ionic conductances of the surface and transverse tubular membranes of frog sartorius fibers. J Gen Physiol. 1969 Mar;53(3):279–297. doi: 10.1085/jgp.53.3.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Endo M. Entry of fluorescent dyes into the sarcotubular system of the frog muscle. J Physiol. 1966 Jul;185(1):224–238. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. FREYGANG W. H., Jr, GOLDSTEIN D. A., HELLAM D. C., PEACHEY L. D. THE RELATION BETWEEN THE LATE AFTER-POTENTIAL AND THE SIZE OF THE TRANSVERSE TUBULAR SYSTEM OF FROG MUSCLE. J Gen Physiol. 1964 Nov;48:235–263. doi: 10.1085/jgp.48.2.235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. FREYGANG W. H., Jr, GOLDSTEIN D. A., HELLAM D. C. THE AFTER-POTENTIAL THAT FOLLOWS TRAINS OF IMPULSES IN FROG MUSCLE FIBERS. J Gen Physiol. 1964 May;47:929–952. doi: 10.1085/jgp.47.5.929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. GRUNDFEST H. Ionic mechanisms in electrogenesis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1961 Sep 6;94:405–457. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1961.tb35554.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. HODGKIN A. L., HOROWICZ P. Movements of Na and K in single muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1959 Mar 3;145(2):405–432. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. HODGKIN A. L., HOROWICZ P. The effect of sudden changes in ionic concentrations on the membrane potential of single muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1960 Sep;153:370–385. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. HODGKIN A. L., HOROWICZ P. The influence of potassium and chloride ions on the membrane potential of single muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1959 Oct;148:127–160. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Heistracher P., Hunt C. C. The relation of membrane changes ot contraction in twitch muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1969 May;201(3):589–611. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hodgkin A. L., Nakajima S. Analysis of the membrane capacity in frog muscle. J Physiol. 1972 Feb;221(1):121–136. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hodgkin A. L., Nakajima S. The effect of diameter on the electrical constants of frog skeletal muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1972 Feb;221(1):105–120. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jaimovich E., Venosa R. A., Shrager P., Horowicz P. Density and distribution of tetrodotoxin receptors in normal and detubulated frog sartorius muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1976 Apr;67(4):399–416. doi: 10.1085/jgp.67.4.399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. KEYNES R. D. The ionic fluxes in frog muscle. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1954 May 27;142(908):359–382. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1954.0030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mathias R. T., Eisenberg R. S., Valdiosera R. Electrical properties of frog skeletal muscle fibers interpreted with a mesh model of the tubular system. Biophys J. 1977 Jan;17(1):57–93. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(77)85627-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mobley B. A., Eisenberg B. R. Sizes of components in frog skeletal muscle measured by methods of stereology. J Gen Physiol. 1975 Jul;66(1):31–45. doi: 10.1085/jgp.66.1.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. NAKAJIMA S., IWASAKI S., OBATA K. Delayed rectification and anomalous rectification in frog's skeletal muscle membrane. J Gen Physiol. 1962 Sep;46:97–115. doi: 10.1085/jgp.46.1.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. NARAHASHI T., DEGUCHI T., URAKAWA N., OHKUBO Y. Stabilization and rectification of muscle fiber membrane by tetrodotoxin. Am J Physiol. 1960 May;198:934–938. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1960.198.5.934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nakajima S., Nakajima Y., Bastian J. Effects of sudden changes in external sodium concentration on twitch tension in isolated muscle fibers. J Gen Physiol. 1975 Apr;65(4):459–482. doi: 10.1085/jgp.65.4.459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Nakajima S., Nakajima Y., Peachey L. D. Speed of repolarization and morphology of glygerol-treated frog muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1973 Oct;234(2):465–480. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Peachey L. D. The sarcoplasmic reticulum and transverse tubules of the frog's sartorius. J Cell Biol. 1965 Jun;25(3 Suppl):209–231. doi: 10.1083/jcb.25.3.209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Schneider M. F. Linear electrical properties of the transverse tubules and surface membrane of skeletal muscle fibers. J Gen Physiol. 1970 Nov;56(5):640–671. doi: 10.1085/jgp.56.5.640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Stanfield P. R. The onset of the effects of zinc and tetraethylammonium ions on action potential duration and twitch amplitude of single muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1973 Dec;235(3):639–654. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Valdiosera R., Clausen C., Eisenberg R. S. Impedance of frog skeletal muscle fibers in various solutions. J Gen Physiol. 1974 Apr;63(4):460–491. doi: 10.1085/jgp.63.4.460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES