Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1978 Aug 1;72(2):167–202. doi: 10.1085/jgp.72.2.167

The spatiotemporal transfer function of the Limulus lateral eye

PMCID: PMC2228534  PMID: 211177

Abstract

The dynamics of the Limulus retina may be well described by the spatiotemporal transfer function, which measures the response of the eye to moving sinusoidal gratings. We consider a model for this system, which incorporates an excitatory generator potential, and self- and lateral inhibitory processes. Procedures are described which allow estimation of parameters for the model consistent with the empirical transfer function data. Transfer functions calculated from the model show good agreement with laboratory measurements, and may be used to predict accurately the response of the eye to arbitrary moving stimuli. The model allows convenient interpretation of the transfer function measurements in terms of physiological processes which underly the response of the Limulus retina.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.8 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barbi M., Carelli V., Frediani C., Petracchi D. The self-inhibited leaky integrator: transfer functions and steady state relations. Biol Cybern. 1975 Oct 1;20(1):51–59. doi: 10.1007/BF00350999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barlow R. B., Jr, Fraioli A. J. Inhibition in the Limulus lateral eye in situ. J Gen Physiol. 1978 Jun;71(6):699–720. doi: 10.1085/jgp.71.6.699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barlow R. B., Jr Inhibitory fields in the Limulus lateral eye. J Gen Physiol. 1969 Sep;54(3):383–396. doi: 10.1085/jgp.54.3.383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barlow R. B., Jr, Lange G. D. A nonlinearity in the inhibitory interactions in the lateral eye of limulus. J Gen Physiol. 1974 May;63(5):579–589. doi: 10.1085/jgp.63.5.579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barlow R. B., Jr, Quarles D. A., Jr Mach bands in the lateral eye of Limulus. J Gen Physiol. 1975 Jun;65(6):709–730. doi: 10.1085/jgp.65.6.709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Biederman-Thorson M., Thorson J. Dynamics of excitation and inhibition in the light-adapted Limulus eye in situ. J Gen Physiol. 1971 Jul;58(1):1–19. doi: 10.1085/jgp.58.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dodge F. A., Jr, Knight B. W., Toyoda J. Voltage noise in Limulus visual cells. Science. 1968 Apr 5;160(3823):88–90. doi: 10.1126/science.160.3823.88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. FUORTES M. G., HODGKIN A. L. CHANGES IN TIME SCALE AND SENSITIVITY IN THE OMMATIDIA OF LIMULUS. J Physiol. 1964 Aug;172:239–263. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fohlmeister J. F., Poppele R. E., Purple R. L. Repetitive firing: a quantitative study of feedback in model encoders. J Gen Physiol. 1977 Jun;69(6):815–848. doi: 10.1085/jgp.69.6.815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fohlmeister J. F., Poppele R. E., Purple R. L. Repetitive firing: quantitative analysis of encoder behavior of slowly adapting stretch receptor of crayfish and eccentric cell of Limulus. J Gen Physiol. 1977 Jun;69(6):849–877. doi: 10.1085/jgp.69.6.849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HARTLINE H. K., RATLIFF F. Inhibitory interaction of receptor units in the eye of Limulus. J Gen Physiol. 1957 Jan 20;40(3):357–376. doi: 10.1085/jgp.40.3.357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Johnston D., Wachtel H. Electrophysiological basis for the spatial dependence of the inhibitory coupling in the Limulus retina. J Gen Physiol. 1976 Jan;67(1):1–25. doi: 10.1085/jgp.67.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kirschfeld K., Reichardt W. Die Verarbeitung stationärer optischer Nachrichten im Komplexauge von Limulus (Ommatidien-Sehfeld und räumliche Verteilung der Inhibition) Kybernetik. 1964 Jun;2(2):43–61. doi: 10.1007/BF00288558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Knight B. W. Dynamics of encoding in a population of neurons. J Gen Physiol. 1972 Jun;59(6):734–766. doi: 10.1085/jgp.59.6.734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Knight B. W., Toyoda J. I., Dodge F. A., Jr A quantitative description of the dynamics of excitation and inhibition in the eye of Limulus. J Gen Physiol. 1970 Oct;56(4):421–437. doi: 10.1085/jgp.56.4.421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Leung L. S., Freeman W. J. The spatial temporal response of the Limulus eye neural set. J Theor Biol. 1977 Nov 7;69(1):41–56. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(77)90387-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pinter R. B. Sinusoidal and delta function responses of visual cells of the Limulus eye. J Gen Physiol. 1966 Jan;49(3):565–593. doi: 10.1085/jgp.49.3.565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ratliff F., Knight B. W., Graham N. On tuning and amplification by lateral inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Mar;62(3):733–740. doi: 10.1073/pnas.62.3.733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ratliff F., Knight B. W., Jr, Dodge F. A., Jr, Hartline H. K. Fourier analysis of dynamics of excitation and inhibition in the eye of Limulus: amplitude, phase and distance. Vision Res. 1974 Nov;14(11):1155–1168. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(74)90212-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ratliff F., Knight B. W., Milkman N. Superposition of excitatory and inhibitory influences in the retina of Limulus: effect of delayed inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1970 Nov;67(3):1558–1564. doi: 10.1073/pnas.67.3.1558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ratliff F., Knight B. W., Toyoda J., Hartline H. K. Enhancement of flicker by lateral inhibition. Science. 1967 Oct 20;158(3799):392–393. doi: 10.1126/science.158.3799.392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Shapley R. Effects of lateral inhibition on fluctuations of the impulse rate. J Gen Physiol. 1971 May;57(5):557–575. doi: 10.1085/jgp.57.5.557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Thorson J., Biederman-Thorson M. Distributed relaxation processes in sensory adaptation. Science. 1974 Jan 18;183(4121):161–172. doi: 10.1126/science.183.4121.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Victor J. D., Shapley R. M., Knight B. W. Nonlinear analysis of cat retinal ganglion cells in the frequency domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Jul;74(7):3068–3072. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.7.3068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES