Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1982 Sep 1;80(3):353–375. doi: 10.1085/jgp.80.3.353

Improved electrical coupling in uterine smooth muscle is associated with increased numbers of gap junctions at parturition

PMCID: PMC2228686  PMID: 7142952

Abstract

We have studied some passive electrical properties of uterine smooth muscle to determine whether a change in electrical parameters accompanies gap junction formation at delivery. The length constant of the longitudinal myometrium increased from 2.6 +/- 0.8 mm (X +/- SD) before term to 3.7 +/- 1 mm in tissues from delivering animals. The basis of the change was a 33% decrease in internal resistance and a 46% increase in membrane resistance. Axial current flow in an electrical syncytium such as myometrium is impeded by the cytoplasm of individual cells plus the junctions between cells. Measurement of the longitudinal impedance indicated that the specific resistance of the myoplasmic component was constant at 319 +/- 113 omega . cm before term and 340 +/- 93 omega . cm at delivery. However, a decrease in junctional resistance was apparent from 323 +/- 161 omega . cm to 134 +/- 64 omega . cm at delivery. 1.5-2 d after delivery, the junctional resistance was increased, as was the myoplasmic resistance. Thin-section electron microscopy of some of the same muscle samples showed that gap junctions were present in significantly greater numbers in the delivering tissues. Therefore, our results support the hypothesis that gap junction formation at delivery is associated with improved electrical coupling of uterine smooth muscle.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abe Y. Effects of changing the ionic environment on passive and active membrane properties of pregnant rat uterus. J Physiol. 1971 Apr;214(1):173–190. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abe Y., Tomita T. Cable properties of smooth muscle. J Physiol. 1968 May;196(1):87–100. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Afting E. G., Elce J. S. DNA in the rat uterus myometrium during pregnancy and postpartum involution. Measurement of DNA in small pieces of mammalian tissue. Anal Biochem. 1978 May;86(1):90–99. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(78)90321-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson G. F., Kawarabayashi T., Marshall J. M. Effect of indomethacin and aspirin on uterine activity in pregnant rats: comparison of circular and longitudinal muscle. Biol Reprod. 1981 Mar;24(2):359–372. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod24.2.359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bennett M. V., Goodenough D. A. Gap junctions, electrotonic coupling, and intercellular communication. Neurosci Res Program Bull. 1978 Sep;16(3):1–486. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bortoff A., Gilloteaux J. Specific tissue impedances of estrogen- and progesterone-treated rabbit myometrium. Am J Physiol. 1980 Jan;238(1):C34–C42. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1980.238.1.C34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bywater R. A., Taylor G. S. The passive membrane properties and excitatory junction potentials of the guinea pig deferens. J Physiol. 1980 Mar;300:303–316. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bülbring E., Kuriyama H. The action of catecholamines on guinea-pig taenia coli. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1973 Mar 15;265(867):115–121. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1973.0014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. CASTEELS R., KURIYAMA H. MEMBRANE POTENTIAL AND IONIC CONTENT IN PREGNANT AND NON-PREGNANT RAT MYOMETRIUM. J Physiol. 1965 Mar;177:263–287. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. CSAPO A. I. Smooth muscle as a contractile unit. Physiol Rev Suppl. 1962 Jul;5:7–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. CSAPO A. I., TAKEDA H. EFFECT OF PROGESTERONE ON THE ELECTRIC ACTIVITY AND INTRAUTERINE PRESSURE OF PREGNANT AND PARTURIENT RABBITS. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1965 Jan 15;91:221–231. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(65)90204-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Caillé J. P. Myoplasmic impedance of the barnacle muscle fiber. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1975 Dec;53(6):1178–1185. doi: 10.1139/y75-163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chapman R. A., Fry C. H. An analysis of the cable properties of frog ventricular myocardium. J Physiol. 1978 Oct;283:263–282. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Clapham D. E., Shrier A., DeHaan R. L. Junctional resistance and action potential delay between embryonic heart cell aggregates. J Gen Physiol. 1980 Jun;75(6):633–654. doi: 10.1085/jgp.75.6.633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dahl G., Berger W. Nexus formation in the myometrium during parturition and induced by estrogen. Cell Biol Int Rep. 1978 Jul;2(4):381–387. doi: 10.1016/0309-1651(78)90024-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Daniel E. E., Daniel V. P., Duchon G., Garfield R. E., Nichols M., Malhotra S. K., Oki M. Is the nexus necessary for cell-to-cell coupling of smooth muscle? J Membr Biol. 1976 Aug 26;28(2-3):207–239. doi: 10.1007/BF01869698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Freygang W. H., Trautwein W. The structural implications of the linear electrical properties of cardiac Purkinje strands. J Gen Physiol. 1970 Apr;55(4):524–547. doi: 10.1085/jgp.55.4.524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fuchs A. R. Uterine activity in late pregnancy and during parturition in the rat. Biol Reprod. 1969 Dec;1(4):344–353. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod1.4.344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gage P. W., Eisenberg R. S. Capacitance of the surface and transverse tubular membrane of frog sartorius muscle fibers. J Gen Physiol. 1969 Mar;53(3):265–278. doi: 10.1085/jgp.53.3.265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Garfield R. E., Kannan M. S., Daniel E. E. Gap junction formation in myometrium: control by estrogens, progesterone, and prostaglandins. Am J Physiol. 1980 Mar;238(3):C81–C89. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1980.238.3.C81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Garfield R. E., Rabideau S., Challis J. R., Daniel E. E. Ultrastructural basis for maintenance and termination of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Feb 1;133(3):308–315. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(79)90685-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Garfield R. E., Sims S. M., Kannan M. S., Daniel E. E. Possible role of gap junctions in activation of myometrium during parturition. Am J Physiol. 1978 Nov;235(5):C168–C179. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1978.235.5.C168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Garfield R. E., Sims S., Daniel E. E. Gap junctions: their presence and necessity in myometrium during parturition. Science. 1977 Dec 2;198(4320):958–960. doi: 10.1126/science.929182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Goto K., Masuda Y., Kasuya Y. The effect of denervation on the synchronization of contraction of the rat vas deferens. Eur J Pharmacol. 1976 Apr;36(2):395–404. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(76)90093-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Goto K., Westfall D. P., Fleming W. W. Denervation-induced changes in electrophysiologic parameters of the smooth muscle of the guinea-pig and rat was deferens. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1978 Feb;204(2):325–333. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. HODGKIN A. L. A note on conduction velocity. J Physiol. 1954 Jul 28;125(1):221–224. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Haeusler G., Thorens S. Effects of tetraethylammonium chloride on contractile, membrane and cable properties of rabbit artery muscle. J Physiol. 1980 Jun;303:203–224. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hamon G., Papadimitriou A., Worcel M. Ionic fluxes in rat uterine smooth muscle. J Physiol. 1976 Jan;254(2):229–243. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. KURIYAMA H., CSAPO A. A study of the parturient uterus with the microelectrode technique. Endocrinology. 1961 Jun;68:1010–1025. doi: 10.1210/endo-68-6-1010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kanda S., Kuriyama H. Specific features of smooth muscle cells recorded from the placental region of the myometrium of pregnant rats. J Physiol. 1980 Feb;299:127–144. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kannan M. S., Daniel E. E. Formation of gap junctions by treatment in vitro with potassium conductance blockers. J Cell Biol. 1978 Aug;78(2):338–348. doi: 10.1083/jcb.78.2.338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kléber A. G. Effects of sucrose solution on the longitudinal tissue resistivity of trabecular muscle from mammalian heart. Pflugers Arch. 1973 Dec 18;345(3):195–205. doi: 10.1007/BF00586334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Knox W. E., Lister-Rosenoer L. M. Timing of gestation in rats by fetal and maternal weights. Growth. 1978 Mar;42(1):43–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kroeger E. A., Stephens N. L. Effect of tetraethylammonium on tonic airway smooth muscle: initiation of phasic electrical activity. Am J Physiol. 1975 Feb;228(2):633–636. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1975.228.2.633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kuriyama H., Suzuki H. Changes in electrical properties of rat myometrium during gestation and following hormonal treatments. J Physiol. 1976 Sep;260(2):315–333. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Liggins G. C. Initiation of parturition. Br Med Bull. 1979 May;35(2):145–150. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a071561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lodge S., Sproat J. E. Resting membrane potentials of pacemaker and non pacemaker areas in rat uterus. Life Sci. 1981 May 18;28(20):2251–2256. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(81)90577-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Loewenstein W. R. Junctional intercellular communication: the cell-to-cell membrane channel. Physiol Rev. 1981 Oct;61(4):829–913. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1981.61.4.829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Merk F. B., Kwan P. W., Leav I. Gap junctions in the myometrium of hypophysectomized estrogen-treated rats. Cell Biol Int Rep. 1980 Mar;4(3):287–294. doi: 10.1016/0309-1651(80)90061-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Mobley B. A., Leung J., Eisenberg R. S. Longitudinal impedance of single frog muscle fibers. J Gen Physiol. 1975 Jan;65(1):97–113. doi: 10.1085/jgp.65.1.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. New W., Trautwein W. Inward membrane currents in mammalian myocardium. Pflugers Arch. 1972;334(1):1–23. doi: 10.1007/BF00585997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ohba M., Sakamoto Y., Tokuno H., Tomita T. Impedance components in longitudinal direction in the guinea-pig taenia coli. J Physiol. 1976 Apr;256(3):527–540. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Paton D. M., Buckland-Nicks J., Johns A. Postjunctional supersensitivity of the rat vas deferens and gap junctions. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1976 Jun;54(3):412–416. doi: 10.1139/y76-058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. SPERELAKIS N., HOSHIKO T. Electrical impedance of cardiac muscle. Circ Res. 1961 Nov;9:1280–1283. doi: 10.1161/01.res.9.6.1280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Singer J. J., Walsh J. V., Jr Passive properties of the membrane of single freshly isolated smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol. 1980 Nov;239(5):C153–C161. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1980.239.5.C153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Stibitz G. R., McCann F. V. Studies of impedance in cardiac tissue using sucrose gap and computer techniques. II. Circuit simulation of passive electrical properties and cell-to-cell transmission. Biophys J. 1974 Feb;14(2):75–98. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(74)70001-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Thorburn G. D., Challis J. R. Endocrine control of parturition. Physiol Rev. 1979 Oct;59(4):863–918. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1979.59.4.863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Tomita T. Electrophysiology of mammalian smooth muscle. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1975;30(2-3):185–203. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(76)90009-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Tomita T. The longitudinal tissue impedance of the smooth muscle of guinea-pig taenia coli. J Physiol. 1969 Mar;201(1):145–159. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Tomita T., Watanabe H. Factors controlling myogenic activity in smooth muscle. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1973 Mar 15;265(867):73–85. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1973.0010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Williams E. H., DeHaan R. L. Electrical coupling among heart cells in the absence of ultrastructurally defined gap junctions. J Membr Biol. 1981;60(3):237–248. doi: 10.1007/BF01992561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Zelcer E., Daniel E. E. Electrical coupling in rat myometrium during pregnancy. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1979 May;57(5):490–495. doi: 10.1139/y79-074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES