Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1982 Oct 1;80(4):499–515. doi: 10.1085/jgp.80.4.499

Functional stoichiometry at the nicotinic receptor. The photon cross section for phase 1 corresponds to two bis-Q molecules per channel

PMCID: PMC2228709  PMID: 6292333

Abstract

These experiments examine changes in the agonist-induced conductance that occur when the agonist-receptor complex is perturbed. Voltage- clamped Electrophorus electroplaques are exposed to the photoisomerizable agonist trans-Bis-Q. A 1-microsecond laser flash photoisomerizes some trans-Bis-Q molecules bound to receptors; because the cis configuration is not an agonist, receptor channels close within a few hundred microseconds. This effect is called phase 1. We compare (a) the fraction of channels that close during phase 1 with (b) the fraction of trans-Bis-Q molecules that undergo trans leads to cis photoisomerization. Parameter a is measured as the fractional diminution in voltage-clamp currents during phase 1. Parameter b is measured by changes in the optical spectra of Bis-Q solutions caused by flashes. At low flash intensities, a is twice b, which shows that the channel can be closed by photoisomerizing either of two bound agonist molecules. Conventional dose-response studies with trans-Bis-Q also give a Hill coefficient of two. As a partial control for changes in the photochemistry caused by binding of Bis-Q to receptors, spectral measurements are performed on the photoisomerizable agonist QBr, covalently bound to solubilized acetylcholine receptors from Torpedo. The bound and free agonist molecules have the same photoisomerization properties. These results verify the concept that the open state of the acetylcholine receptor channel is much more likely to be associated with the presence of two bound agonist molecules than with a single such molecule.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (860.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams P. R. An analysis of the dose-response curve at voltage-clamped frog-endplates. Pflugers Arch. 1975 Oct 28;360(2):145–153. doi: 10.1007/BF00580537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bartels E., Wassermann N. H., Erlanger B. F. Photochromic activators of the acetylcholine receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Aug;68(8):1820–1823. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.8.1820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blanchard S. G., Quast U., Reed K., Lee T., Schimerlik M. I., Vandlen R., Claudio T., Strader C. D., Moore H. P., Raftery M. A. Interaction of [125I]-alpha-bungarotoxin with acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo californica. Biochemistry. 1979 May 15;18(10):1875–1883. doi: 10.1021/bi00577a005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cash D. J., Hess G. P. Molecular mechanism of acetylcholine receptor-controlled ion translocation across cell membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Feb;77(2):842–846. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.2.842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Conti-Tronconi B. M., Hunkapiller M. W., Lindstrom J. M., Raftery M. A. Amino acid sequence homology between "alpha" subunits from Torpedo and Electrophorus acetylcholine receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1982 May 31;106(2):312–318. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(82)91111-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Damle V. N., Karlin A. Affinity labeling of one of two alpha-neurotoxin binding sites in acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo californica. Biochemistry. 1978 May 30;17(11):2039–2045. doi: 10.1021/bi00604a002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dionne V. E., Steinbach J. H., Stevens C. F. An analysis of the dose-response relationship at voltage-clamped frog neuromuscular junctions. J Physiol. 1978 Aug;281:421–444. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dreyer F., Peper K., Sterz R. Determination of dose-response curves by quantitative ionophoresis at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1978 Aug;281:395–419. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Elliott J., Blanchard S. G., Wu W., Miller J., Strader C. D., Hartig P., Moore H. P., Racs J., Raftery M. A. Purification of Torpedo californica post-synaptic membranes and fractionation of their constituent proteins. Biochem J. 1980 Mar 1;185(3):667–677. doi: 10.1042/bj1850667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lester H. A. Analysis of sodium and potassium redistribution during sustained permeability increases at the innervated face of Electrophorus electroplaques. J Gen Physiol. 1978 Dec;72(6):847–862. doi: 10.1085/jgp.72.6.847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lester H. A., Chang H. W. Response of acetylcholine receptors to rapid photochemically produced increases in agonist concentration. Nature. 1977 Mar 24;266(5600):373–374. doi: 10.1038/266373a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lester H. A., Changeux J. P., Sheridan R. E. Conductance increases produced by bath application of cholinergic agonists to Electrophorus electroplaques. J Gen Physiol. 1975 Jun;65(6):797–816. doi: 10.1085/jgp.65.6.797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lester H. A., Koblin D. D., Sheridan R. E. Role of voltage-sensitive receptors in nicotinic transmission. Biophys J. 1978 Mar;21(3):181–194. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(78)85518-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lester H. A., Krouse M. E., Nass M. M., Wassermann N. H., Erlanger B. F. A covalently bound photoisomerizable agonist: comparison with reversibly bound agonists at Electrophorus electroplaques. J Gen Physiol. 1980 Feb;75(2):207–232. doi: 10.1085/jgp.75.2.207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lester H. A., Krouse M. E., Nass M. M., Wassermann N. H., Erlanger B. F. Light-activated drug confirms a mechanism of ion channel blockade. Nature. 1979 Aug 9;280(5722):509–510. doi: 10.1038/280509a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Moore H. P., Raftery M. A. Studies of reversible and irreversible interactions of an alkylating agonist with Torpedo californica acetylcholine receptor in membrane-bound and purified states. Biochemistry. 1979 May 15;18(10):1862–1867. doi: 10.1021/bi00577a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nass M. M., Lester H. A., Krouse M. E. Response of acetylcholine receptors to photoisomerizations of bound agonist molecules. Biophys J. 1978 Oct;24(1):135–160. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(78)85352-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Neubig R. R., Cohen J. B. Permeability control by cholinergic receptors in Torpedo postsynaptic membranes: agonist dose-response relations measured at second and millisecond times. Biochemistry. 1980 Jun 10;19(12):2770–2779. doi: 10.1021/bi00553a036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Neubig R. R., Krodel E. K., Boyd N. D., Cohen J. B. Acetylcholine and local anesthetic binding to Torpedo nicotinic postsynaptic membranes after removal of nonreceptor peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Feb;76(2):690–694. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.2.690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sheridan R. E., Lester H. A. Rates and equilibria at the acetylcholine receptor of Electrophorus electroplaques: a study of neurally evoked postsynaptic currents and of voltage-jump relaxations. J Gen Physiol. 1977 Aug;70(2):187–219. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sine S. M., Taylor P. The relationship between agonist occupation and the permeability response of the cholinergic receptor revealed by bound cobra alpha-toxin. J Biol Chem. 1980 Nov 10;255(21):10144–10156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wathey J. C., Nass M. M., Lester H. A. Numerical reconstruction of the quantal event at nicotinic synapses. Biophys J. 1979 Jul;27(1):145–164. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(79)85208-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wolosin J. M., Lyddiatt A., Dolly J. O., Barnard E. A. Stoichiometry of the ligand-binding sites in the acetylcholine-receptor oligomer from muscle and from electric organ. Measurement by affinity alkylation with bromoacetylcholine. Eur J Biochem. 1980 Aug;109(2):495–505. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1980.tb04821.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES