Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium logoLink to Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium
. 1999:945–949.

The low availability of metadata elements for evaluating the quality of medical information on the World Wide Web.

J Shon 1, M A Musen 1
PMCID: PMC2232512  PMID: 10566500

Abstract

A great barrier to the use of Internet resources for patient education is the concern over the quality of information available. We conducted a study to determine what information was available in Web pages, both within text and metadata source code, that could be used in the assessment of information quality. Analysis of pages retrieved from 97 unique sites using a simple keyword search for "breast cancer treatment" on a generic and a health-specific search engine revealed that basic publishing elements were present in low frequency: authorship (20%), attribution/references (32%), disclosure (41%), and currency (35%). Only one page retrieved contained all four elements. Automated extraction of metadata elements from the source code of 822 pages retrieved from five popular generic search engines revealed even less information. We discuss the design of a metadata-based system for the evaluation of quality of medical content on the World Wide Web that addresses current limitations in ensuring quality.

Full text

PDF
945

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Boyer C., Selby M., Scherrer J. R., Appel R. D. The Health On the Net Code of Conduct for medical and health Websites. Comput Biol Med. 1998 Sep;28(5):603–610. doi: 10.1016/s0010-4825(98)00037-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brennan P. F., Caldwell B., Moore S. M., Sreenath N., Jones J. Designing HeartCare: custom computerized home care for patients recovering from CABG surgery. Proc AMIA Symp. 1998:381–385. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Eysenbach G., Diepgen T. L. Towards quality management of medical information on the internet: evaluation, labelling, and filtering of information. BMJ. 1998 Nov 28;317(7171):1496–1500. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7171.1496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hersh W. R., Gorman P. N., Sacherek L. S. Applicability and quality of information for answering clinical questions on the Web. JAMA. 1998 Oct 21;280(15):1307–1308. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.15.1307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Impicciatore P., Pandolfini C., Casella N., Bonati M. Reliability of health information for the public on the World Wide Web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home. BMJ. 1997 Jun 28;314(7098):1875–1879. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7098.1875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jadad A. R., Gagliardi A. Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel? JAMA. 1998 Feb 25;279(8):611–614. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.8.611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kim P., Eng T. R., Deering M. J., Maxfield A. Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites: review. BMJ. 1999 Mar 6;318(7184):647–649. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7184.647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Munoz F., Hersh W. MCM generator: a Java-based tool for generating medical metadata. Proc AMIA Symp. 1998:648–652. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Silberg W. M., Lundberg G. D., Musacchio R. A. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA. 1997 Apr 16;277(15):1244–1245. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wyatt J. C. Commentary: measuring quality and impact of the World Wide Web. BMJ. 1997 Jun 28;314(7098):1879–1881. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7098.1879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium are provided here courtesy of American Medical Informatics Association

RESOURCES