Skip to main content
Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium logoLink to Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium
. 1999:461–465.

An institution-based process to ensure clinical software quality.

S A Abookire 1, J M Teich 1, D W Bates 1
PMCID: PMC2232604  PMID: 10566401

Abstract

Clinical software can have a major impact on the delivery of care. It is imperative that clinical software undergo regular quality review, to evaluate the clinical correctness of the specification, the technical correctness of the software, problems that have arisen, and maintenance of the software as conditions change. We have developed a process using existing hospital review groups to perform clinical review, and using a project specification form and analysis of likely problem areas to effect technical review.

Full text

PDF
461

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bates D. W., Leape L. L., Cullen D. J., Laird N., Petersen L. A., Teich J. M., Burdick E., Hickey M., Kleefield S., Shea B. Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. JAMA. 1998 Oct 21;280(15):1311–1316. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.15.1311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hripcsak G., Knirsch C. A., Jain N. L., Pablos-Mendez A. Automated tuberculosis detection. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997 Sep-Oct;4(5):376–381. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1997.0040376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Miller R. A., Gardner R. M. Summary recommendations for responsible monitoring and regulation of clinical software systems. American Medical Informatics Association, The Computer-based Patient Record Institute, The Medical Library Association, The Association of Academic Health Science Libraries, The American Health Information Management Association, and The American Nurses Association. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Nov 1;127(9):842–845. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-9-199711010-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sailors R. M., East T. D., Wallace C. J., Carlson D. A., Franklin M. A., Heermann L. K., Kinder A. T., Bradshaw R. L., Randolph A. G., Morris A. H. Testing and validation of computerized decision support systems. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1996:234–238. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Schulz E. B., Barrett J. W., Price C. Read Code quality assurance: from simple syntax to semantic stability. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998 Jul-Aug;5(4):337–346. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1998.0050337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Young F. E. Validation of medical software: present policy of the Food and Drug Administration. Ann Intern Med. 1987 Apr;106(4):628–629. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-106-4-628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium are provided here courtesy of American Medical Informatics Association

RESOURCES