Abstract
This paper aims to retrieve and evaluate the quality of the Internet sites providing information on cardiovascular risk. We searched web pages related to risk prediction using six search engines. Sites proposing a cardiovascular risk prediction were selected for evaluation. The quality of each site was checked against criteria testing the validity, type and potential usefulness of information for physicians or patients. Search engines retrieved about 50 10(6) web pages. Eight sites were included. Only 2 of them provided calculation of cardiovascular risk based on Framingham equation. The others proposed algorithms, guidelines, or general information on cardiovascular health. Most sites lacked details to ensure quality of information. Present search engines are inefficient to retrieve precise and valid information. Facing the inflation of medical information, a systematic approach to validate the quality of a site is mandatory. Application of Evidence Based Medicine concepts gives a solution for evaluation of internet-based medical information.
Full text
PDF




Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Anderson K. M., Wilson P. W., Odell P. M., Kannel W. B. An updated coronary risk profile. A statement for health professionals. Circulation. 1991 Jan;83(1):356–362. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.83.1.356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chatellier G., Ménard J. The absolute risk as a guide to influence the treatment decision-making process in mild hypertension. J Hypertens. 1997 Mar;15(3):217–219. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199715030-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davis D. A., Taylor-Vaisey A. Translating guidelines into practice. A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines. CMAJ. 1997 Aug 15;157(4):408–416. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grimshaw J. M., Russell I. T. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet. 1993 Nov 27;342(8883):1317–1322. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92244-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Impicciatore P., Pandolfini C., Casella N., Bonati M. Reliability of health information for the public on the World Wide Web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home. BMJ. 1997 Jun 28;314(7098):1875–1879. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7098.1875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim P., Eng T. R., Deering M. J., Maxfield A. Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites: review. BMJ. 1999 Mar 6;318(7184):647–649. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7184.647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laupacis A., Wells G., Richardson W. S., Tugwell P. Users' guides to the medical literature. V. How to use an article about prognosis. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1994 Jul 20;272(3):234–237. doi: 10.1001/jama.272.3.234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oxman A. D., Cook D. J., Guyatt G. H. Users' guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1994 Nov 2;272(17):1367–1371. doi: 10.1001/jama.272.17.1367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oxman A. D., Sackett D. L., Guyatt G. H. Users' guides to the medical literature. I. How to get started. The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1993 Nov 3;270(17):2093–2095. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Silberg W. M., Lundberg G. D., Musacchio R. A. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA. 1997 Apr 16;277(15):1244–1245. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Worrall G., Chaulk P., Freake D. The effects of clinical practice guidelines on patient outcomes in primary care: a systematic review. CMAJ. 1997 Jun 15;156(12):1705–1712. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wyatt J. C. Commentary: measuring quality and impact of the World Wide Web. BMJ. 1997 Jun 28;314(7098):1879–1881. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7098.1879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
