Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the information needs of users of the Stanford Health Information Network for Education (SHINE), an integrated information retrieval (IR) system. METHODS: A subset of queries from the SHINE log were categorized into one or more of 33 categories. RESULTS: Drugs and infectious disease accounted for 25% of categorizations, and otherwise the distribution of categorizations was quite broad. CONCLUSIONS: Attention should be paid to the selection of drug information resources in medical knowledge information retrieval systems. The distribution of query categorizations also suggests that IR systems include a wide range of knowledge resources.
Full text
PDF




Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Barnett G. O., Cimino J. J., Hupp J. A., Hoffer E. P. DXplain. An evolving diagnostic decision-support system. JAMA. 1987 Jul 3;258(1):67–74. doi: 10.1001/jama.258.1.67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cimino C., Barnett G. O. Analysis of physician questions in an ambulatory care setting. Comput Biomed Res. 1992 Aug;25(4):366–373. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(92)90026-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Covell D. G., Uman G. C., Manning P. R. Information needs in office practice: are they being met? Ann Intern Med. 1985 Oct;103(4):596–599. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-103-4-596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Forsythe D. E., Buchanan B. G., Osheroff J. A., Miller R. A. Expanding the concept of medical information: an observational study of physicians' information needs. Comput Biomed Res. 1992 Apr;25(2):181–200. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(92)90020-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haynes R. B., McKibbon K. A., Walker C. J., Ryan N., Fitzgerald D., Ramsden M. F. Online access to MEDLINE in clinical settings. A study of use and usefulness. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Jan 1;112(1):78–84. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-112-1-78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hersh W. R., Greenes R. A. SAPHIRE--an information retrieval system featuring concept matching, automatic indexing, probabilistic retrieval, and hierarchical relationships. Comput Biomed Res. 1990 Oct;23(5):410–425. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(90)90031-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hersh W. R., Hickam D. H. How well do physicians use electronic information retrieval systems? A framework for investigation and systematic review. JAMA. 1998 Oct 21;280(15):1347–1352. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.15.1347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hersh W., Hickam D. Use of a multi-application computer workstation in a clinical setting. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1994 Oct;82(4):382–389. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hubbs P. R., Tsai M., Dev P., Godin P., Olyarchuk J. G., Nag D., Linder G., Rindfleisch T. C., Melmon K. L. The Stanford Health Information Network for Education: integrated information for decision making and learning. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1997:505–508. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Osheroff J. A., Forsythe D. E., Buchanan B. G., Bankowitz R. A., Blumenfeld B. H., Miller R. A. Physicians' information needs: analysis of questions posed during clinical teaching. Ann Intern Med. 1991 Apr 1;114(7):576–581. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-114-7-576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith R. What clinical information do doctors need? BMJ. 1996 Oct 26;313(7064):1062–1068. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7064.1062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]